Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Appearance settings

Add test for Table-Driven-Vacuum-Agent.#747

Closed
roberthoenig wants to merge 1 commit intoaimacode:masteraimacode/aima-python:masterfrom
roberthoenig:add-tabledrivenvacuumagent-testroberthoenig/aima-python:add-tabledrivenvacuumagent-testCopy head branch name to clipboard
Closed

Add test for Table-Driven-Vacuum-Agent.#747
roberthoenig wants to merge 1 commit intoaimacode:masteraimacode/aima-python:masterfrom
roberthoenig:add-tabledrivenvacuumagent-testroberthoenig/aima-python:add-tabledrivenvacuumagent-testCopy head branch name to clipboard

Conversation

@roberthoenig
Copy link
Contributor

Note that this changes the percept sequence table in the code, it now slightly differs from table 2.3
in the book. The underlying problem here is that a full table can principally not be specified, so '...' is used to represent the missing table entries. While this works for the book, the code requires some additional table entries for the agent to succeed.

I can see how this approach might be considered less than optimal. If that's the case, I'm happy to discuss alternative solutions.

Note that this changes the percept sequence table
in the code, it now slightly differs from table 2.3
in the book. The underlying problem here is that a
full table can principally not be specified, so '...'
is used to represent the missing table entries. While
this works for the book, the code requires some
additional table entries for the agent to succeed.
@apb7
Copy link
Contributor

apb7 commented Feb 16, 2018

Hello, @roberthoenig! This issue has already been fixed in PR #732 and #738. Please see those PRs once. It would be better if we have a single PR for the same issue.
Thanks!

@roberthoenig
Copy link
Contributor Author

@apb7 thanks for the heads-up, I should've checked existing issues/PRs more carefully :) Closing this in favor of #732.

@apb7
Copy link
Contributor

apb7 commented Feb 16, 2018

No problem, @roberthoenig! Thank you for your cooperation. Looking forward to your contribution :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

Morty Proxy This is a proxified and sanitized view of the page, visit original site.