New Adversarial Attack #2402
Replies: 1 comment · 3 replies
-
|
Hi @emancellari Thank you very much for considering ART for your new attack! We are looking for a diverse set of attacks, what is the most distinguishing feature of your new attack? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Normally we have proceeded before with our EA attack. Our team member @aliotopal (Ali Osman Topal), he was in discussion with you and after several steps "the discussion was stopped". He did some steps and waited for your feedback. Now, I am dealing with the code and wanted to know what is the issue that we have to fix? Thanks, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Hi @emancellari Thank you for your update, I'm sorry, we must have missed your responses at some time among messages from other users. How does your attack distinguish itself from other black-box attack? In which scenarios is it most useful? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Hi @beat-buesser, referred to our and @aliotopal discussion, we have explained in detail our attack. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1568494623004155. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I am Enea Mancellari from University of Luxembourg. My team and I have published a new adversarial attack, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1568494623004155. We are working in our research by using this attack. I wanted to discuss with your team if is it possible to add this attack and use it as toolbox. So in this way while publishing new articles we can refer to "Trusted-AI/adversarial-robustness-toolbox". Could you help me with the rule/procedue of adding our attack? Best regards, Enea
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions