Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Appearance settings

Conversation

@benjchristensen
Copy link
Member

See #1824

@benjchristensen
Copy link
Member Author

I chose rx.annotations but am open to suggestions for a better package name. It could perhaps be rx.lifecycle. I don't want rx.util or rx.common. We worked hard to eliminate those catch-all packages.

@daschl
Copy link
Contributor

daschl commented Nov 29, 2014

+1 on annotations

@benjchristensen
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks for voting on this so it's not just me!

@akarnokd
Copy link
Member

rx.annotations is okay with me as well.

@benjchristensen
Copy link
Member Author

I'm merging this then so we can start using it on some of the other PRs.

Thanks @daschl and @akarnokd for the review.

benjchristensen added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 29, 2014
@benjchristensen benjchristensen merged commit eb8254e into ReactiveX:1.x Nov 29, 2014
@benjchristensen benjchristensen deleted the lifecycle-annotations branch November 29, 2014 21:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

Morty Proxy This is a proxified and sanitized view of the page, visit original site.