Open
Description
In the Swagger 2.0 specification, there is support for adding a License
as one of the informational fields and the description for this is License information for the exposed API.
This seems a bit ambiguous, since a license could potentially be understood to apply to one or more of the following contexts:
- Use of the API. This situation seems to be already handled by the
termsOfService
section though. - Data retrieved from the API
- The specification JSON/YAML for the API indeed, there is a license for the Swagger 2 specification
- Client/server code generated via swagger-codegen could some licenses theoretically extend to that?
I am guessing that the item 3 is the intended use for the license field, but I will admit that at first I thought it was meant for the first case and I could not see how a license would actually apply. Is it possible to get some clarification of how licenses should be picked here and where they do and do not apply?
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
requests to clarify, but not change, part of the specrequests to clarify, but not change, part of the specWording and stylistic issuesWording and stylistic issues