Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Appearance settings

Clarification on the purpose of the API license? #726

Copy link
Copy link
Open
@harrisj

Description

@harrisj
Issue body actions

In the Swagger 2.0 specification, there is support for adding a License as one of the informational fields and the description for this is License information for the exposed API.

This seems a bit ambiguous, since a license could potentially be understood to apply to one or more of the following contexts:

  1. Use of the API. This situation seems to be already handled by the termsOfService section though.
  2. Data retrieved from the API
  3. The specification JSON/YAML for the API indeed, there is a license for the Swagger 2 specification
  4. Client/server code generated via swagger-codegen could some licenses theoretically extend to that?

I am guessing that the item 3 is the intended use for the license field, but I will admit that at first I thought it was meant for the first case and I could not see how a license would actually apply. Is it possible to get some clarification of how licenses should be picked here and where they do and do not apply?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    clarificationrequests to clarify, but not change, part of the specrequests to clarify, but not change, part of the speceditorialWording and stylistic issuesWording and stylistic issuesreview

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions

      Morty Proxy This is a proxified and sanitized view of the page, visit original site.