Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Appearance settings

Comments

Close side panel

Less conservative size for the analysis job pool#5645

Merged
ktf merged 1 commit intodevAliceO2Group/AliceO2:devfrom
ktf-patch-16AliceO2Group/AliceO2:ktf-patch-16Copy head branch name to clipboard
Mar 9, 2021
Merged

Less conservative size for the analysis job pool#5645
ktf merged 1 commit intodevAliceO2Group/AliceO2:devfrom
ktf-patch-16AliceO2Group/AliceO2:ktf-patch-16Copy head branch name to clipboard

Conversation

@ktf
Copy link
Member

@ktf ktf commented Mar 6, 2021

No description provided.

@ktf ktf requested a review from a team as a code owner March 6, 2021 21:19
@ktf ktf merged commit 2e1145a into dev Mar 9, 2021
@ktf ktf deleted the ktf-patch-16 branch March 9, 2021 07:02
@ktf
Copy link
Member Author

ktf commented Mar 9, 2021

This seems to work in general. The QC issue seems unrelated. @TimoWilken can we try raising the number of processes for the CI, given this should keep the analysis ones under check?

@davidrohr
Copy link
Collaborator

I think we cannot increase the number of jobs again. Yesterday it had to be decreased again, and that was when the analysis pool was set to 1 process only. In order to increase the number of jobs, we really need more memory.

@ktf
Copy link
Member Author

ktf commented Mar 9, 2021

ok

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

Morty Proxy This is a proxified and sanitized view of the page, visit original site.