Note on a Passage in Fourier's Heat
The source document of this text is not known. Please see this document's talk page for details for verification. "Source" means a location at which other users can find a copy of this work. Ideally this will be a scanned copy of the original that can be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons and proofread. If not, it is preferably a URL; if one is not available, please explain on the talk page. |
This work is incomplete. If you'd like to help expand it, see the help pages and the style guide, or leave a comment on the talk page. |
In finding the motion of heat in a sphere, Fourier expands a function , arbitrary between the limits
and
, in a series of the form
&
where ,
, &
. are the successive roots of the equation
Now Fourier gives no demonstration of the possibility of this expansion, but he merely determines what the coefficients ,
, &
would be, if the function were represented by a series of this form. Poisson arrives, by another method, at the same conclusion as Fourier, and then states this objection to Fourier’s solution; but, as is remarked by Mr Kelland (Theory of Heat, p. 81, note), he “does not appear, as far as I can see, to get over the difficulty.” The writer of the following article hopes that the demonstration in it will be considered as satisfactory, and consequently as removing the difficulty.
Let ,
, and
Then the preceding series will take the form
&
the accents being omitted above .
Now it is shewn by Fourier, that
This work was published before January 1, 1930, and is in the public domain worldwide because the author died at least 100 years ago.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse