Wikipedia:XfD today

Articles

Recent AfDs: Today Yesterday

Media Organisations Biography Society Web Games Science Arts Places Indiscernible Unsorted

< April 05	April 07 >

Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

Croatia and the World Bank

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article was created and mostly written by a student editor for a course entitled "IPE Money and Finance IMF WB" with nearly all primary sources attributed to the World Bank. Appears to fail WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV, with similar issues found at comparable articles such as India and the World Bank. Peripteros (talk) 18:19, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2026 April 6. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:33, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance and Croatia. Shellwood (talk) 18:52, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Justice Documentary Festival Paris

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability isn't established through significant coverage in independent sources.

Source 1 is a webzine is mostly just summaries of each of the films in the 2023 edition; source 2 is primary; source 3 is a "what's going on in town this weekend?" type summary of the 2023 festival; Source 4 is primary; Source 5 is primary; Source 6 is primary; Source 7 is primary; Source 8 is a brief piece from a legal journal and isn't significant coverage (it also contradicts the article and says it's the "very first" festival when the article says there have been multiple editions); Source 9 is primary; Source 10 is primary.

So, 7 of 10 sources are primary. The remaining sources aren't significant coverage or reliable sources. A search for the title both in English and France returns essentially the same sources and mentions of a couple of the documentaries having won prizes there in articles about those films. CountryANDWestern (talk) 18:10, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and France. CountryANDWestern (talk) 18:10, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Atheist's wager

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm seeking an altered consensus in this forum. There was 2010 decision to merge, base on this version with discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atheist's Wager (2nd nomination), but the current version is significant better and more reliably sourced, with significant improvements over the last 15 years or so. I hence suggest keep. Klbrain (talk) 17:33, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Philosophy and Religion. Klbrain (talk) 17:33, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Atheism-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:54, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Vera List Center for Art and Politics

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Proposing keep, to over-rule a 2010 consensus to delete (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Vera List Center for Art and Politics). While the removal of the merge template back in May 2010 (by an IP editor with this edit) was in error, the article on the Center has grown with significant improvements over the last 15 years. I therefore suggest that rather than implement a 2010 decision, that this forum now recommends keep. Klbrain (talk) 17:11, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Visual arts and Politics. Klbrain (talk) 17:11, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and New York. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:12, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Noting that I refactored the AfD template on the article to reflect the merge nature of this discussion.
Comment: I couldn't find much secondary sigcov in my (admittedly brief) search. I'm wondering if Klbrain might have found some more recent coverage. The current article needs some clean up no matter what, in the prize winners section, for every year there are lots of links to what seems to be routine press coverage included after a "Press:" which strikes me as promotional. I also don't think the Fellowship section is very encyclopedic, but that's more an issue for the talk page I guess. I haven't formed an opinion the merge just yet, but I agree that it would be better to reestablish consensus after 15+ years instead of implementing the old merge consensus (I know no deadlines and all that, but sometimes discussions are just stale). ScrubbedFalcon (talk) 19:10, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Lane Hall

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This building does not appear to meet notability standards, I do not see any reliable sources establishing the subject's notability. Many of the sources are primary, and by the look of the prose, the entire article is original research. This appears to be a nondescript building on the campus of a very small college. The intricate level of detail into the college's governance is either original research or improper synthesis. Nominating for deletion per the existing templates. ~2026-16420-40 (talk) 09:35, 22 March 2026 (UTC) Filed on behalf of TA by DMacks (talk)[reply]

Keep, easily meets GNG, both with the existing sources and with the books and other sources listed on the page as additional reading, etc. A full researched and presented article about the major campus building of this "very small college" (tell the graduates how insignificant their college is, as well as their 86 Fulbright Scholars; 22 Watson Fellows; 5 Rhodes Scholars; 7 Emmy Award winners; and 5 Pulitzer Prize winners). If you are beginning an AfD career, please find better targets, thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:03, 22 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture and Maine. Shellwood (talk) 12:08, 22 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
TNT. There are two different meanings of this title thrown together here. The infobox and lead first-paragraph say it's about the building, but the majority of the article is instead about the school administrative structure. The school is obviously notable, but that doesn't mean every building on its campus is (nor, as Randy Kryn notes, does the fact that it's a very small college give any prejudice against its subtopics being independently notable). Looking at the two topics:
- The building: re-merge to History of Bates College. I'm not seeing claims of notability here. I do not have access to the additional-reading items, but their titles do not suggest they will be enough. Happy for someone to make a cited claim or two, and I'd easily strike this concern.
- The administration: keep but rename (maybe Bates College administration). Seems like there's enough cited detail to have a well-defined sub-article that conceptually was spun out of Bates College, per summarystyle and size/scope of that parent. But need to overhaul Bates College#Administration to summarize it.
That leaves Lane Hall...I don't see a primary topic (the real thing with this name would be a section-redirect, the notable thing doesn't really have this name), so a two-entry DAB page. DMacks (talk) 12:24, 22 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for helping submit this request on my behalf as nominator. A two-entry DAB page may the best option, as example:

(a) for the Lane Hall on the campus of Bates College that serves as administrative headquarters, see Bates College#Administration

(b) for the Lane Hall on the campus of Virginia Tech, see Campus of Virginia Tech.

In terms of "the building" portion, the content and further reading section was copied directly from history of Bates College so re-merging would not be a good fit due to duplicate information. In terms of "the administration" portion, its "cited detail" is only cited to one source, the college's legal charter and bylaws. The content restates this one primary source as orginal research with extreme levels of excess intricate detail (AI?). The college may be notable but this specific building and its functional use is clearly not as no secondary sources establish notability. ~2026-16420-40 (talk) 09:16, 25 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: For the record, Bates is a very prestigious college, and I'd love it if any of my former students went there. No opinion on the deletion. Bearian (talk) 20:20, 25 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mkdw ^talk 22:23, 29 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I respectfully disagree with the above comment. The building itself does not merit an article based upon its own notability. Certainly the school does, as do many of the individual student who passed through the building, but not the building itself. Go4thProsper (talk) 21:32, 2 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 15:32, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge to History of Bates College. This article does not appear to be even mostly about the specific building, rather the history and administration of the college. It does not appear to meet WP:SGCOV, and as others have stated, appears to rely on original research. Redvelvetvanilaaaaaaaaa (talk) 17:15, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Guillaume Gevart

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability isn't clearly shown. His "claim to fame" is an honorable mention as a non-notable student film festival.

Going through the sources: Source 1 is an interview; Source 2 is a couple of paragraphs about students making a film; Source 3 is a database film listing (he's not listed on the page); Source 4 is a film review (he's mentioned in one sentence as operating a camera); Source 5 is another database listing; Source 6 is questionable - the author is only listed on the website as writing this one article and none others suggesting a placed article rather than reliable journalism; Source 7 looks press release-like; Source 8 looks dead; Source 9 is a film database; Source 10 mentions him in a sentence or two; Source 11 is a film review and it's not clearly a reliable/notable website for a review to appear on especially as its FAQs include "How do I get my film (feature or short) featured online or in print with Substream Magazine?"; Source 12 is an interview and it appears to be a "submit your name and we'll interview you" thing.

A Google News search seems to return basically the same sources already listed in the article or mentions of his name on websites that host the movie for streaming. CountryANDWestern (talk) 15:19, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and France. CountryANDWestern (talk) 15:19, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. @CountryANDWestern pretty comprehensively covered the issues with the article. I have confirmed the issues with sourcing. This page doesn't seem to meet WP:SIGCOV and reads as self-promotion, especially given the linked pages were all created in the past two months. Redvelvetvanilaaaaaaaaa (talk) 17:19, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I'll Bet He's Nice

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This song is not independently notable. It only appears as brief mentions alongside other songs from The Beach Boys Love You. It has not charted. The article was previously a redirect to the album, but recent attempts to restore the redirect have been reverted. -- Recon rabbit 14:49, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and United States of America. -- Recon rabbit 14:49, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to The Beach Boys Love You. This song is not independently notable and does not appear to meet Wikipedia:SIGCOV. Redvelvetvanilaaaaaaaaa (talk) 17:20, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect - not notable alone and is mentioned alongside other topics, I do think there should be a degree of merging of important info not mentioned in The Beach Boys Love You appropriate with the degree of explanation of the rest of the songs in the article. AML KING (talk) 18:41, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I added a sentence from the one usable source in this article to that one. -- Recon rabbit 18:54, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect. It seems reading comprehension at AfD is quite low. I suspect there are probably offline sources about the song, as this was made prior to the era of the Internet, but nothing came up. Unfortunately, I don't have access to the Beach Boys bibliography, and the Google News links are stuffed by trivial mentions from the recent reissue, so it fails NSONG right now. If someone can provide sources, feel free to ping me. ~2026-19166-54 (talk) 19:29, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Nebojša Grujić

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources, fails WP:BASICSPORT ApwCow 14:35, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Serbia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:54, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Olympics-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:24, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment A world champion probably has coverage. I'll let someone else look though. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 18:37, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Phonetic reversal

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The only "sourced" content in this article was a WP:NOTTVTROPES-level list of works of fiction where somebody spoke backwards and then reversed the footage, such as the Man from Another Place, and the sources were nothing but YouTube videos and fan sites. After removing that, I found zero sources explicitly discussing the subject of "phonetic reversal". I found multiple cases where a random name in fiction happened to be a certain phrase said backwards and was referred to as a "phonetic reversal" of a word, and a couple instances of people discussing the Man from Another Place or similar backwards-speech tricks, but none specifically called it "phonetic reversal". This article has had a {{refimprove}} since 2016 with none forthcoming, and I was unable to find any specific sources discussing this as a phenomenon by this name, just passing mentions where it happened in a work. If there are sources out there, then this article needs some WP:TNT and probably a move to another title. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 14:36, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 14:36, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The Venus Chained

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing seems overly notable here. The single award is an honorable mention at what appears to be a non-notable student film festival. (Cannot verify that award). The sources provided are unreliable. Several are database/synopsis type entries and not coverage of the film. The "APN News" source appears to be an unreliable site; the article's author has written no other article for that website. I can't find anything promising in a BEFORE search either. CountryANDWestern (talk) 14:31, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and France. CountryANDWestern (talk) 14:31, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Zaw Myat Lynn

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wholly AI-generated, with byte sequence as described in WP:AISIGNS § turn0search0 since creation in Permalink/1296418824. --Gurkubondinn (talk) 14:28, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Suspected AI-generated articles, Asia, and Myanmar. --Gurkubondinn (talk) 14:28, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:31, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as AI-generated. In addition to the byte sequence noted by nom, reference 3 is misaligned - the claim that he was director of *Suu* Vocational College is not supported by ref 3 or 4, but they DO say that he was an official in Aung San *Suu* Kyi’s National League for Democracy (NLD). Lijil (talk) 16:29, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Akong Langmeisu

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable personal. only a few source cover her that too mostly in passing. Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 02:55, 30 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Royalty and nobility, and Manipur. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:30, 30 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Cannot find significant coverage in scholarly sources. Zalaraz (talk) 06:59, 30 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keep : In total contrast to the claim of the nomination rationale, the three sources are all third party, secondary, academic sources. One source is in English language, published by Sahitya Akademi, India's highest level literature society. Another source is authored by Padma Shree awardee scholar Ningthoukhongjam Khelchandra, and is used as an academic resource in the Manipur University. And another source is a modern literary adaptation edition on the said literary genre which contains the topic's large coverage. None of them are primary sources. I suggest the nominating person to further restudy the pages, WP:SECONDARY, WP:GNG and WP:RELIABLE before massive level nomination of notable articles. Just because it's not available in English language Google search or any readily available internet platform doesn't guarantee deletion because its topics are well covered in the non English sources, which one should check properly. Haoreima (talk) 09:50, 30 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with @Zalaraz You are conflating, source quality with subject notability, which are totally separate requirements. Even fully credible academic sources only establish notability if they provide significant coverage of this specific subject, per WP:GNG. A maidservant character in a 13th-century literary work is not made notable simply because the work itself is covered in reputable sources. The core problem here is WP:SIGCOV. Plus you are using the same three sources, for every article. It is implausible that academic literary histories dedicate significant independent coverage to Akong Langmeisu specifically rather than mentioning her incidentally within the broader narrative. The article's own text confirms she is a secondary character whose entire role spans one deceptive act. See WP:NOTINHERITED. Also to me it appears as part of a systematic WP:SPINOUT pattern creating standalone articles for every character in one work using the same citation cluster, which constitutes WP:COATRACK article creation. Could not find any significant scholarly articles as @Zalaraz pointed out Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 16:54, 30 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:26, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Prataparudra's Expedition against Ambadeva

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability concerns and issues with sourcing. Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 02:56, 30 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Military, and Andhra Pradesh. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:28, 30 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The sourcing of this article is not consistent with Wikipedia’s standards, contains excessive linking, and shows potential undisclosed use of LLMs. Articlenit (talk) 23:21, 30 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Beyond this article having shaky notability standards, the person who leads the revolt has a similarly shaky page with only one or two sources. Seems to be a niche topic which does not have enough coverage for a full article. AML KING (talk) 18:46, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:20, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Schlitterer See

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG,appears to be a municipal pool. Only coverage appears to be this non-independent description. No obvious merge target. Suriname0 (talk) 03:24, 30 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Austria. Suriname0 (talk) 03:24, 30 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Maybe this can be merged to Schlitters? Kelob2678 (talk) 11:40, 30 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:19, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

St James' Anglican Church, Morrisons

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apparently non-notable Australian parish church. I see no evidence of notability via WP:GNG or a heritage listing to pass WP:NBUILDING. The sources in the article are a directory listing, a user-generated site, and some WP:TRIVIALMENTIONS ([1], [2], [3]). Nothing else qualifying found in a WP:BEFORE search. Contested WP:BLAR; seeking consensus for a redirect to Morrisons, Victoria, where it is mentioned; a redirect to Anglican Diocese of Ballarat would be appropriate too, as is often done for non-notable parish churches. Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:18, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture, Christianity, and Australia. Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:16, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Anglican Diocese of Ballarat: I don't see coverage offering notability in any of the sources. There might be a source that discusses the architecture of the building, but I did not see it. The diocesan article seems like a better redirect target because the sources present in the article strike me as more about the ecclesiastical elements of the church than its cultural context in Morrison. Best, ~ Pbritti (talk) 15:24, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

AtGlobal

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Likely to fail WP:NCORP KH-1 (talk) 02:50, 23 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language, Companies, and Japan. jolielover♥talk 04:13, 23 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Adding AfD comment

Comment The current version of the article is admittedly weak under WP:NCORP and relies too much on routine listings, certifications, and primary or quasi-primary material. However, I have proposed on the article's talk page a concrete neutral rewrite that removes much of the promotional and directory-like content and reduces the article to basic, verifiable facts. In my view, the present version should not be treated as the best possible version of the topic. A reduced, neutral rewrite should be considered before concluding that deletion is necessary. Shekhar-at (talk) 02:03, 26 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ScrubbedFalcon (talk) 11:56, 30 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:11, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Sarwar Kamal Azizi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG or WP:NPOL Mehru13 (talk) 13:55, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Mehru13 (talk) 13:55, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Bangladesh. Shellwood (talk) 14:10, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Silver Planet

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage of the record label in independent reliable sources to establish notability. Found album, recording, and artist mentions, but no in-depth content about Silver Planet. The Prod on 7 July 2010 was de-proded. JoeNMLC (talk) 13:44, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Companies. JoeNMLC (talk) 13:44, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No sources, and not even a list of signed artists. Found a few WP:USERGEN sources via Google, but nothing that would meet WP:NCORP. nil^nz 14:03, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:09, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Literally zero sources and no evidence of WP:N AML KING (talk) 19:02, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Greg Packer (musician)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Majority of citations in this article are not supported by reliable sources. It's mainly ai generated, I think it intends to be unencyclopedic and does not establish notability whatsoever. SirJustinfranklin (talk) 13:16, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. SirJustinfranklin (talk) 13:16, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Australia. Shellwood (talk) 14:10, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Dolphins United F.C.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced. Fails WP:GNG. Scoria (talk) 12:43, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Sports, ~~American football~~, and Philippines. Scoria (talk) 12:43, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting list for the following topic: Football. Frank Anchor 13:37, 6 April 2026 (UTC) [reply]
Redirect to List of football clubs in the Philippines. Fails WP:GNG due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV. WIlling to reconsider if coverage is made available, so please ping me. Frank Anchor 13:34, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

2026 Santa Cruz earthquake

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No WP:LASTING to warrant an article. Scoria (talk) 12:34, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Science, and United States of America. Scoria (talk) 12:34, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:43, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

1989 Loma Prieta earthquake alumnus here. Articles speaks to the readiness of California's ShakeAlert. Too, WP:Eventualism is applicable when and if it is deemed a foreshock. Give it a few weeks. kencf0618 (talk) 14:41, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with kencf0618. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 15:57, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Adriana Sosnovschi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced article of a female tennis player without evidence of meeting WP:GNG. No Romanian Wikipedia exists either. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 12:32, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Tennis, and Moldova. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 12:32, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: This was about all that came up [4], not a RS. Without much more for sourcing, we don't have notability. Oaktree b (talk) 13:10, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Siamese invasion of Malacca (1500)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Note: This merge proposal was originally opened on the article's talk page. Following the March 2026 RfC, formal merge discussions are now held at AfD rather than the historical Proposed article mergers (PAM) process. I've moved the discussion accordingly per WP:TPO.

Moved from Talk:Ayutthaya invasions of the Malacca Sultanate § Merge proposal

– FaviFake (talk) 12:30, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Merge proposal

I propose merging Siamese invasion of Malacca (1500) into Ayutthaya invasions of the Malacca Sultanate. The first article is also about an Ayutthaya invasion of the Malacca Sultanate. According to these articles there were 3 invasions: around 1447, 1456 and 1500. Merging them would not cause any article-size or weighting problems. - Artanisen (talk) 11:13, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. FaviFake (talk) 12:30, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Military, Malaysia, and Thailand. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:43, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Vincent McGee

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks reliable significant independent coverage. Cited sources are passing mentions and executive profiles which are closely associated with the person. Rht bd (talk) 11:50, 6 April 2026 (UTC) Rht bd (talk) 11:50, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Politics. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:52, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – The subject meets WP:GNG (General Notability Guidelines) and WP:POLITICIAN (applicable to historical activists). McGee was the petitioner in a landmark Supreme Court case (McGee v. United States, 402 U.S. 479) regarding conscientious objection. Furthermore, his leadership as Executive Director of the Aaron Diamond Foundation (responsible for founding the Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Center) and his role as Chair of the Board of Amnesty International USA provide significant, documented impact in the fields of philanthropy and human rights. I have added several reliable third-party sources (NYPL archives, Supreme Court records) to the article to reflect this. Neweditorargos (talk) 13:25, 6 April 2026 (UTC) — Note to closing admin: Neweditorargos (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this XfD. [reply]

Eric Jagwara

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unclear if there's enough to meet WP:NBIO KH-1 (talk) 11:27, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Engineering, Artificial intelligence, and Uganda. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:31, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I personally consider a page notable if there are enough unbiased sources to provide a view on the person, where every fact that isn't inherently obvious has a citation. I think that the article needs a good deal of reworking, deletion of unnecessary paragraphs, etc., but it does, I think, meet standards. Wikipedian12512(alt) (talk) 15:58, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

UGRO Capital

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH. Indian media sources often present press releases as news WP:RSNOI, WP:ROUTINE. As of now, the page is a WP:PROMO. Highly suspicious for WP:COI. Please also consider the previous deletions: UGRO Capital Limited, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/U GRO Capital. Saahil Vats (talk) 11:23, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Companies, India, and Maharashtra. Saahil Vats (talk) 11:23, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: The coverage looks enough to consider WP:LISTED. Still, I would seek others' opinion regarding whether only LISTED could be enough for notability in this case. BhikhariInformer (talk) 13:31, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Raissa Butkowski

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article fails to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines of politicians, noting that while she is a candidate for an upcoming election, WP:NOTNEWS and WP:10YT are core policies which would protest her notability. Should Ms. Butkowski not win the seat (which is a likely scenario per opinion polling, notwithstanding WP:CRYSTAL), she will not be notable. Youshouldchooseausernamethat (Youshouldtalk) 11:06, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Politicians, Women, and Australia. Youshouldchooseausernamethat (Youshouldtalk) 11:06, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:32, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

2026 New Iberia vehicle crash

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTNEWS & WP:ROUTINE. A routine RTA caused by a drunk driver with no fatalities. Thousands of such incidents happen every day across the globe. Obi2canibe (talk) 10:43, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime, Transportation, and Louisiana. Obi2canibe (talk) 10:43, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:49, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - It was all over the news! ...for one day. Terrible accident. Hope everyone recovers. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:52, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Basically a local story. With time this have turned in to a non notable accident.BabbaQ (talk) 15:54, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with New Iberia, Louisiana. This accident is an important event in the town's history, but is not notable enough to have its own dedicated article.

NesserWiki (talk) 17:16, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Humen-Shijing

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I nominate this article for deletion because the subject lacks sufficient independent, reliable secondary sources to establish notability. The article relies mostly on primary sources and does not meet the general notability guideline of Wikipedia. There is also insufficient independent coverage to justify a standalone article.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 小太阳888 (talk • contribs) 05:59, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, History, Military, and China. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:48, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Insufficient sourcing for a standalone article. Rzvas (talk) 18:01, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thaumatichthyidae

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose merging Thaumatichthyidae into Thaumatichthys. An editor added a merge tag to the former but didn't start a proposal. These pages do look like WP:DUPlicates, but I'm not confident doing a WP:BOLDMERGE as it's possible they could be different. FaviFake (talk) 09:40, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal and Organisms. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:47, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This does not belong here. Start a merge discussion on the talk page of one of the two affected articles, and withdraw this AfD. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 13:04, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly read the section above the one you linked to in your comment :) FaviFake (talk) 14:11, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly don't rewrite the bloody information page and then smart-ass about it immedately after! This is either clueless or disruptive. What do you think you are playing at???- Apart from that clownery, apparently this is the process now, so as you were :/ --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 17:46, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly note that it's best for everyone if I update the bloody information page. Do you kindly think it should be merged? FaviFake (talk) 17:54, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I object to you playing gotchas 24h after updating a guideline that has been in place for a decade. I wasn't even aware of that RfC and so won't a great many others, therefore please get in the habit of stating clearly that merges are now channelled through AfD, rather than dropping smirking one-liners. - As for the merge itself: yes, this is a monotypic taxon with a single genus, and should consequently be covered at the genus level (WP:MONOTYPICFAUNA). --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 18:08, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't played any gotchas and it hasn't been 24h since I updated the page. I merely pointed you to an explanation of the current process. FaviFake (talk) 18:20, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Ur-Fascism

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Note: ~~This merge proposal was originally opened on the article's talk page.~~ Following the March 2026 RfC, formal merge discussions are now held at AfD rather than the historical Proposed article mergers (PAM) process. I've moved the discussion accordingly per WP:TPO.

Moved from Talk:Ur-Fascism § Redundancy

– FaviFake (talk) 09:32, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

This pages content is nearly identically (and better) contained in definitions of fascism. It should be deleted and forward to the relevant section of that article. Azrael aaaaa (talk) 21:48, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

signed below. Crucabuloso (talk) 21:32, 5 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The opposite should occur, IMO. Viriditas (talk) 00:27, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. FaviFake (talk) 09:32, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Why was this kept open for over a year? I thought the RfC applied to NEW discussions. There were a lot of these older discussions that were closed as stale. – The Grid (talk) 13:39, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Huh, I didn't notice this thread was created a year ago. The page was tagged today and I noticed the timestamp of the first reply was correct, but I must've glanced over the other timestamps. (why was the newest reply above the older one anyway?) This was technically open for less than a day, but I'll make sure to avoid moving old discussions in the future, even if they've been tagged recently.
I could withdraw this (and I will if anyone asks me to), but the merge seems uncontroversial enough. Maybe it should even be deleted? It's only based off of a source and the entire content is already at the target, Definitions of fascism § Umberto Eco. FaviFake (talk) 14:06, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

North High School (Youngstown, Ohio)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Note: This merge proposal was originally opened on the article's talk page. Following the March 2026 RfC, formal merge discussions are now held at AfD rather than the historical Proposed article mergers (PAM) process. I've moved the discussion accordingly per WP:TPO.

Moved from Talk:Youngstown City School District § Merge proposal

– FaviFake (talk) 09:16, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Merge proposal

I propose merging the following articles:

into Youngstown City School District. The source articles are largely stubs with limited sourcing (Rayen excepted). Consolidating these into the parent district article provides better context for readers. Additionally, with further closures and a new school merger imminent, this consolidation allows us to maintain a "Former schools" section and a clean slate for the future high school article. 636Buster (talk) 21:41, 5 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. FaviFake (talk) 09:16, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Schools. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:46, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

OpenTide Korea

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Currently, the available information regarding the company consists mostly of short articles focusing simply on mergers or corporate status rather than the company itself; this fails to satisfy the "Significant coverage of the company itself" requirement of Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies). Therefore, I propose the deletion of this article. Joow0n1 (talk) 06:41, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and South Korea. Joow0n1 (talk) 06:41, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:53, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Eno (company)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The available sources do not provide detailed or continuous coverage of the company. Most references are only brief mentions or business listings, which do not meet the requirements of Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies). In addition, the article contains very limited information. It only includes basic facts such as location and founding year, but lacks details about the company’s development, impact, or importance. The article also looks more like a directory entry than an encyclopedic article, as it lacks meaningful content and analysis. Moreover, some external links appear to be unreliable or outdated, which raises concerns under Wikipedia:Verifiability. Wjyy1212 (talk) 06:34, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Companies, and China. Wjyy1212 (talk) 06:34, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Tiv (illustrator)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is about an illustrator whose notability is not sufficiently demonstrated.

I have conducted a search in accordance with WP:BEFORE, using Google and Google News to identify independent and reliable secondary sources that provide significant coverage of the subject. However, I was unable to find substantial in-depth coverage beyond routine mentions.

While Tiv is credited as an illustrator for several manga works, including Masamune-kun’s Revenge, the available sources are largely primary or affiliated sources, such as publisher pages or database listings. These sources do not provide meaningful independent analysis or discussion of the subject’s career or impact.

The article mainly consists of a list of works, which is insufficient to establish notability under Wikipedia standards.

Therefore, the subject appears to fail the General Notability Guideline (WP:GNG), as there is no significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources.

For these reasons, I propose that the article be deleted. (I used AI to translate the above text from Korean to English, but the thoughts are mine) Koeunchae04 (talk) 06:34, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Anime and manga, and Korea. Koeunchae04 (talk) 06:34, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and South Korea. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:15, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Science and Technology Film Festival

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is very thin and is already tagged for both insufficient citations and unclear notability. The sourcing appears to rely heavily on the festival’s own website and FilmFreeway, and the article consists largely of routine program and awards details from the festival itself. I was unable to identify enough substantial independent secondary coverage about the festival to clearly satisfy WP:GNG for a standalone article. Lucasdmitchell (talk) 06:33, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy, Film, Events, Technology, and Poland. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:16, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - This article lacks proper sourcing and needs more citations.Originalflavors (talk) 10:51, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Bogwangsa

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I searched for sources using Google, Google News, and Google Scholar per WP:BEFORE, but found no significant independent coverage of a specific temple. Sources mentioning "Bogwangsa" refer to multiple different temples in Korea, making the subject unclear. The article lacks reliable, independent secondary sources and therefore fails WP:GNG. It is also poorly sourced and does not meet WP:Verifiability. For these reasons, I propose deletion. VN.NguyenDucDuy (talk) 06:24, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Religion, Geography, and Korea. VN.NguyenDucDuy (talk) 06:24, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:16, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Note that this has been tagged as a potential NGEO failure since 2021. (No opinion.) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:54, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Buddhism-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:54, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, but perhaps move to a better title or one focused on the most significant building. Has an entry in the Encyclopedia of Korean Culture[5]. Also this entry in the Korean wikipedia[6] and the Korean Heritage Service[7] A designated "National Treasure." --Jahaza (talk) 13:56, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was keep. AI generated nomination. (non-admin closure) ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 18:36, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Castle of Deceit

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article should be deleted due to lack of notability and insufficient sourcing. I conducted a WP:BEFORE search and found only database-style sources such as GameFAQs and MobyGames, with no significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. The article fails to meet Wikipedia:Notability (video games), as there is no evidence of in-depth reviews or independent analysis. The available sources are not sufficient to establish notability. Additionally, the article is extremely underdeveloped, with missing sections such as gameplay and reception, suggesting a lack of available reliable information. NGUYENKIMCHI210 (talk) 06:24, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and United States of America. NGUYENKIMCHI210 (talk) 06:24, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Please don't use AI to create AfDs. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 18:35, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

An Sun-jin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article should be deleted due to lack of notability and insufficient sourcing. I conducted a WP:BEFORE search and found only statistical database entries (e.g., J.League and K League records), with no significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. The subject fails to meet Wikipedia:Notability (people), as there is no evidence of notable achievements or substantial media coverage. The article is also extremely minimal and consists only of basic statistics, which does not establish encyclopedic significance. NGUYENKIMCHI210 (talk) 06:24, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and South Korea. NGUYENKIMCHI210 (talk) 06:24, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Football. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:17, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Please don't use AI to create AfDs. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 18:35, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Heung Kong Group

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found numerous companies with the same name on Chinese search engines. Furthermore, I couldn't find any related Chinese news reports. I don't think this company is a well-known, high-profile enterprise. Based on WP:NCORP , I recommend deletion. MouFengcoo (talk) 06:17, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and China. MouFengcoo (talk) 06:17, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:18, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Lake City International Film Festival

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is extremely short the sourcing is mostly directory-style or primary material basically just the website of the festival itself rather than outside independent coverage about the festival itself. I found routine mentions of films receiving awards there, but not enough significant independent coverage focused on the festival to clearly satisfy Wikipedia for a significant enough article . Lucasdmitchell (talk) 06:15, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. I also did a search, only possibly reliable source was Times of India where I found an article about a movie that won an award at the festival [8] - but the article looks promo-ish, and that newspaper is known for paid contributions (see WP:TIMESOFINDIA) so I'm not sure it's independent and it's really not signficant coverage of the festival. Lijil (talk) 07:18, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film, Events, and Madhya Pradesh. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:19, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Crypto payment

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominating for deletion. Content is entirely duplicated across Cryptocurrency, Blockchain, Cryptocurrency wallet, and Digital currency (WP:REDUNDANT). No independent reliable sources establish "crypto payment" as a standalone notable topic (WP:GNG). Article is structured around a directory of commercial payment providers, with the obscure company 0xProcessing and its token "XRT" given undue prominence in the lead and listings (WP:PROMO, WP:NOTDIRECTORY). Recommend delete or redirect to Cryptocurrency. MartyPoppins (talk) 06:02, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. In addition this looks AI-generated (see WP:NOLLM) and lots of sources are spam link to sites selling crypto stuff. Lijil (talk) 07:12, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cryptocurrency-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:20, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per nomination. Some weird inconsistencies between sections, including the spelling of the title. SenshiSun (talk) 12:32, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect - to either the pages on crypto themselves or subheads regarding payment if they exist. Crypto payment is a valid subject but not for a standlone article AML KING (talk) 19:06, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Daehan Tire

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am nominating this article for deletion after performing WP:BEFORE. Although the company exists, a search of English and Korean reliable sources (including Google and Naver) does not reveal significant, independent secondary coverage necessary to establish its notability. The only citation currently provided is a 404 error, which leaves the article's claims unverifiable. It does not appear to meet the criteria for WP:Notability (companies) or WP:V. Lalauraria (talk) 05:45, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I agree with nom, no evidence of notability. Only source is 404, and I couldn't find other sources either.

Lijil (talk) 07:10, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and South Korea. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:21, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Chicken!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The existing sources mainly focus on trivial aspects, such as the controversial name of the restaurant, rather than providing in-depth analysis of the company’s business, impact, or development. According to Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies), a subject must have received substantial coverage in independent sources. However, this article does not demonstrate such coverage and appears more like a promotional or trivial entry. Therefore, the article does not meet the required notability and verifiability standards and should be considered for deletion. Wjyy1212 (talk) 05:41, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Companies, and China. Wjyy1212 (talk) 05:41, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - agree with nom. Ref 1 is a 404, and refs 2 and 3 are both about the dirty meaning of the name in Chinese, which is not sufficient to show notability. Lijil (talk) 07:08, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:21, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Here's an archive of ref 1 from when it was active: https://web.archive.org/web/20140301223311/https://www.iyiou.com/ SenshiSun (talk) 12:37, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Escape (SiriusXM)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails the WP:GNG. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 05:26, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Radio, and United States of America. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 05:26, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no independent, reliable sources. Lijil (talk) 07:04, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Red Bank Generals

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is a rather weak claim of notability for a team that plays in one of the lowest levels of amateur hockey. The sourcing here is not the required WP:SIGCOV and I don't see anything more meaningful in a WP:BEFORE search in Google or Google News.

Per Junior ice hockey#Tier_III, "players at the Tier III level pay a fee or tuition, commonly ranging from $4,000 to $9,500." Not only is this team not professional, they pay for the privilege of being on the team.

Meanwhile, Category:United States Premier Hockey League teams lists several dozen other teams in the United States Premier Hockey League and Template:USPHL Premier is enormous. This AfD serves as a model to see if there should be a more thorough cleanout of USPHL articles. Alansohn (talk) 22:06, 29 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ice hockey and New Jersey. Alansohn (talk) 22:06, 29 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 22:20, 29 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Why not merge with Red Bank Armory? The Generals have been around for 24 years, and a key tenant of the Red Bank Armory.[9][10]

Cfgauss77 (talk) 19:06, 5 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:03, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Farida Kabir

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Both of the previously identified sources are interviews [11] and [12]. No new coverage exists and with WP:NEWSORGNIGERIA it is clear that she fails WP:GNG. BookishReader (talk) 23:06, 22 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, and Nigeria. Shellwood (talk) 23:10, 22 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I'm usually the first one to advocate for a woman keeping her wiki, but there is just not enough of substantive coverage of this lady. Maybe one day! Juju (talk) 04:21, 23 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I added some additional citations, I would argue there is enough there to meet WP:BASIC, including The Guardian and several other of the cited business sources. CaptainAngus (talk) 17:10, 29 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 22:58, 29 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Angus. Meets ANYBIO even if weakly Sahib-e-Qiran, EasternShah 00:44, 30 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I think it barely meets the threshold of WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV. That being said, I think it would be good for some more sources to be added here. Gjb0zWxOb (talk) 16:22, 3 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The first reference is sourced from Wikipedia. The second is a dead link. The third is an interview. The fourth is inclusion in a top 100 listicle. The fifth is about her appointment, the coverage is probably based on a press release. The sixth is an unbylined WP:NEWSORGNIGERIA. The 7th is probably fine. The 8th and 9th are another top 100 listicles. Kelob2678 (talk) 20:36, 5 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:02, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Andre Troutman

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC, WP:ANYBIO, and WP:MUSICBIO. Unable to locate any significant biographical details in secondary sources. No indication of awards or charted songs. Mostly trivial mention in sources cited. Magnolia677 (talk) 14:36, 29 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Magnolia677 (talk) 14:36, 29 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and United States of America. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 14:41, 29 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

~~Move to Draft~~ Strong Keep: Artist has charted on many countries' national music charts as of 2026-04-04, making this a WP:HEY and a strong keep. I think this would be better moved back to draft space rather than deleted. When I created the page, I actually meant to make it in draft space but accidentally published it in mainspace. The subject’s notability is still developing, but there are some clear signs that more coverage and recognition are coming very soon. At least one song he’s involved with is likely to chart on the Billboard Hot 100 this week, and an album he has multiple credits on is projected to debut at or near #1 on the Billboard 200. Adding onto this, we can note that he was part of many of the songs on the recent Kanye West release, it’s evident that he was a soul component of the project Bully. I agree that some of the current sources are more limited or brief mentions, but there are still multiple independent references, and he has documented contributions to projects getting national exposure, including radio airplay. Because of that, this feels more like a case of emerging notability rather than no notability. Given that, I think draftifying the article or adding a notability tag would make more sense than deleting it outright. HungryHighway🛣️ 14:45, 29 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The claim to notability here is that the subject, along with 12 other people, was a producer of the recent Kanye West album. Fails WP:GNG. Kelob2678 (talk) 21:06, 29 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Not just a producer bro ~2026-19887-55 (talk) 12:07, 30 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The forementioned "producer" serves as the guide for West as of the days, were to be before release Bitterbutter (talk) 12:47, 30 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Bully (album). He doesn't appear to be notable in his own right yet but is certainly a valid search term. JOE BRO ⁶⁴ 16:50, 30 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Troutman may well end up back on Wikipedia. The article right now relies on glancing mentions of him in articles about different subjects entirely. The world is teeming with sidemen who have similar clippings. That's not enough significant coverage for Wikipedia, though. Trumpetrep (talk) 22:32, 31 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The subject has charted on at least 9 national music charts after all the previous delete votes were made (and Billboard updated his profile to show he charted in 2019 as well). -- HungryHighway🛣️ 06:16, 4 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 04:29, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

CBNLT

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, but some sources might exist. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 23:59, 29 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Canada. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 23:59, 29 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Keep What differentiates this station from CFKL/CBSET-1 is that it was incorporated into the CBC network as an originating station and aired local news for 12 years. Some of the material from my CFKL paragraph will go here, too. Unfortunately, we do not have very good availability of newspapers in this area to fill in some of the gap. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 00:17, 30 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 04:16, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Traditionsschifferschein

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am also nominating the following related pages because they have the same issues:

I am also nominating the following related pages which are lists of the other pages:

These articles break three Wikpedia policies:

WP:ENGLISH: The titles of these articles about specific German boating licences are not in English and no effort appears to have been made to find English-language sources, although official English translations of public info sites about the licences do exist, e.g. [13]- though these are not independent and thus would not establish notability.
WP:NOLLM: The articles look AI-generated and the editor who created them has already had many articles deleted as AI-generated, see Wikipedia:WikiProject AI Cleanup/Noticeboard#Potential LLM generations by Input Zoom. I would nominate these for G15 but the signs of AI are a bit less obvious than in some of the other articles.
WP:GNG: No evidence of notability. There is no WP:SIGCOV. Many only have one source, sources are mostly to government info pages (in German, even when the site has an English version) so sources are not independent. Lijil (talk) 04:13, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Lijil (talk) 04:13, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Suspected AI-generated articles-related deletion discussions. Lijil (talk) 07:25, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete wow this is an impressive amount of slop, if they were just bad translations that would be one thing but that is not what is happening here. Dr vulpes (Talk) 07:29, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per nom. Nyxion³⁰³ 💬 Talk 10:51, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all of them, per nom. --Gurkubondinn (talk) 15:30, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all - Wow, the only place I've seen more AI slop is the Nintendo eShop and PlayStation Store. This is an insane amount of LLM slop. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 16:46, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Unfortunately I think there might be more where it came from, the user created a LOT of articles: User:Input Zoom. Lijil (talk) 16:49, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Is this guy going for some sort of Wikipedia record? Because this might be the worst LLM abuse I've seen in a while, and that takes effort. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 16:52, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not completely familiar with Wikipedia's reporting system. Is there a way to report the user for repeatedly using AI? Lagtrainzzz (talk) 17:25, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

List of fauna of Batu Caves

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm going to go with WP:TOOSPECIFIC, which was the initial rationale provided at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of graminoids of Soldiers Delight which resulted in deletion. I just now came across this list (well, apparently I had edited it previously), but there are a bunch of Wikipedia pages with hyperspecific lists of organisms of small areas that really aren't encyclopedic. List of Little Picacho Wilderness flora is one that has been on my radar, but I'm not going to nominate it before I go to bed tonight (and {{Flora of the United States by political division}} has some more TOOSPECIFIC lists) Plantdrew (talk) 03:36, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal, Organisms, Lists, and Malaysia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:23, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I copied one of the sources to the main article; I agree this is too specific and interested readers can use the source rather than this list that doesn't add any context. Please check though if anything else should be merged. Reywas92^Talk 13:48, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Hesitant keep. There is a strong point to be made that we don't want to become overly precise in our 'fauna of X' articles. This appears to be a massive cave system of substantial cultural significance. It also has species endemic to this cave system, which would also suggest that populations of some existing species might be quite unique and isolated even when they don't warrant treatment as species in their own right. On a rather recent trip to Mammoth Cave in the USA, I learned that quite a bit of effort is put into documenting any and all species that have been recorded from that cave system, and I do think that interest and effort would translate into rendering a wikipedia article valid. I think not extending that opinion to Batu Caves would probably constitute cultural bias on my part. --Aranae (talk) 18:46, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Pittsburgh sports lore

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

this article is a gigantic, largely unsourced coatrack. none of the sources even mention "sports lore". if there is a useful article here, it's buried behind all the "Announcer reactions". i recommend blowing it all up and starting over. ltbdl (roll) 03:30, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports and Pennsylvania. ltbdl (roll) 03:30, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Yikes! This is nearly entirely unsourced and is simply the authors' opinionated puffery of games and events they thought were significant. I see no reason why these should also be lumped into a single article and described as "lore". I'd recommend that you leave a notice at Wikipedia:WikiProject Pittsburgh though in case something belongs in repective teams' articles. Reywas92^Talk 04:45, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
i've left a notice, but it seems to be a bit of a ghost town. ltbdl (squeeze) 08:27, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:COATRACK as the nominator said. This is just a laundry list of trivia and amusing incidents that would make a good coffee table book to pick up at the Pittsburgh Airport, but not a WP article. I'm not about to check all 68 references but I would be amazed if a single one mentioned "Pittsburgh sports lore". WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 11:05, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Stuff happened, but most of the sourcing is about the events themselves (or in non-RS), not mentioning a collection of "lore". I could see this being used as a list, but without much sourcing it's OR. Oaktree b (talk) 13:17, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: American football, Baseball, and Ice hockey. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 18:32, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Pure WP:OR. Cbl62 (talk) 18:57, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Pantaleon of Pydna

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I assumed this historical person was notable, but at least in English I see virtually nothing. Existed ([14] [15]), but that's about it. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 02:34, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Egypt, and Greece. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 02:34, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I note this was previously nominated four years ago with no consensus, which I only noticed after I made the nomination. @Ficaia included these sources: 1, 2, 3, which seem to say the same thing as the other mentions I cited above. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 02:38, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Dawleys, Illinois

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A place where a now-abandoned Illinois Central line crossed a road, from which you could ship things. And that is pretty much it; there were no buildings there as far back as I could see, and no references to it as a town, much less a discussion. Mangoe (talk) 02:06, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Illinois. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:36, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No information found, and from maps [16] it's pretty clear this was just a rail waypoint, perhaps with a flag stop. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 11:13, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Writers in Paris in the 1920s

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is a pastiche of unsourced and loosely related information. There is a lot to say about expatriates and the literary community in Paris, but a list of writers in Paris in the 1920s isn't quite the thing. BoneAppleTee (talk) 02:03, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Literature, History, and France. BoneAppleTee (talk) 02:03, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

World Copper Agreement

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page should be merged with the International Copper Cartel article. This is the agreement that led to the creation of the International Copper Cartel. This content can be covered in the International Copper Cartel article. Thenightaway (talk) 01:20, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete/Merge: Clearly should be in the International Copper Cartel article. Due to it's significance, most of the information here can even be put into that article, as a subsection. HarvardJock (talk) 01:40, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Merge, no point having separate articles, as context is located at International Copper Cartel PeriodicEditor (talk) 05:38, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Economics, Africa, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Belgium, Chile, and Mexico. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:37, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

BCS (software)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I wasn't able to find WP:SIGCOV in WP:RS. The linked sources are mostly primary or unreliable (user generated reviews and a blog). Schützenpanzer (Talk) 01:00, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Software, and Germany. Schützenpanzer (Talk) 01:00, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

List of Mormon folk beliefs

Basically a giant pile of WP:OR and WP:FRINGE theories. The sources are all or mostly all of questionable validity. Seems to fail WP:NOTABILITY criteria as well. Over the years I have tried to remove the most egregious of it (imagine that), but as I read through it again, I do not think there is any reason Wikipedia should have an article like this. Trevdna (talk) 00:41, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

There are 43 inline citations and 16 references for 23 statements (including sub-bullets as separate statements). Several of the references are books on Mormon folklore. To me, this does seem like it passes notability and is not original research, though I am uncertain of Fringe. A source table might be useful here. At the very least, I would like more details about the problems with this page. SenshiSun (talk) 01:56, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into Mormon folklore since the list is relatively short but the information seems legitimately educational. The beliefs might be fringe but the sources are not. Getting rid of the list seems like a good compromise. @SenshiSun: what do you think? BoneAppleTee (talk) 02:17, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Merge sounds like a perfect compromise here. I didn't realize the other page existed. That page might need some tweaks for formatting-- "Fan-run Mormon Urban Legend Website" doesn't seem like an accurate description of the (defunct) site Holy Fetch. SenshiSun (talk) 11:54, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Mythology, Latter Day Saints, and Lists. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:38, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Files

File:Alireza Jafari, child soldier.jpg

Concerns regarding origin and validity of image: the source listed on the file is an SPS/OR Twitter account which is not a reliable source. The original publication location is listed as Iran Wire, but there is no indication of that in the tweet. I found the image in two other places, Iran HRM (which seems sketchy imo) and The Telegraph, which also does not attribute an original source for the image. Furthermore, when running the image through Google Gemini's SynthID program, the image comes back positive (I tested the version used in the file and from The Telegraph), which adds even more concerns to whether this image is authentic. I am unfamiliar in the FFD area, so apologizes if this is incorrect- also not saying that the image needs to be deleted, but all of these factors combined raise serious concerns on the credibility of the image. GalacticVelocity08 (talk) 01:31, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

If the question is the authenticity of the child's appearence then it's simple to prove its him, as his looks have also been confirmed by in-sources within Iran itself, one of the examples being the video in one of the cited sources itself:

[17] This source by TABNAK shows that the visual match, not only that, but offers different photos of the child even with its family. The mother and father are even shown.

Fars News also shows these results, and footages of the funeral too:

An user-published (not fit for wiki publications) example being :[18]

There is no strong evidence the image is fabricated, and it is consistent with independently verified depictions of the same person. VitoxxMass (talk) 02:07, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Neither of these links load for me, however if they verify the authenticity of the photo then I have no issue WP:AGFing, although I'd still appreciate the opinion of outside editors. Thanks for the additional info. GalacticVelocity08 (talk) 02:41, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You’re welcome. That said, if the image remains a point of concern after further evaluation, I would not oppose replacing it with a still taken directly from the TABNAK footage or other verifiable video sources, as those would have clearer provenance and sourcing. VitoxxMass (talk) 02:44, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Castaway Mickey Mouse.jpeg

Available on Commons as File:027 - The Castaway.png (different file format, not CSD eligible) Magog the Ogre (t • c) 02:22, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete under criterion F8. –DMartin (talk) 18:18, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Karel Richard Richter.jpg

Would it be safe to assume this is an official UK gov't photo, therefore under Crown copyright and PD? Jay Cubby 14:09, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure I would make that assumption. It's cited as "Karel Richter, Agent of the German Intelligence Service, 1941-1942 (KV 2/31)", and then it links to asset# 43835, which doesn't appear to exist. I wonder if it's not from the archives themselves. –DMartin (talk) 18:22, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Dmartin969, see page 4: https://cdn.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documents/file-list-kv-march-2011.pdf

Seemingly a list of official photographs. Jay Cubby 19:01, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects

Utah shake

Utah shake → Milkshake#Utah shakes (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

i might just be bad at this "finding stuff" thing, but the section it targets seems to have been removed not long after creation for being unsourced, and never added back. as is, utah shakes (which are milkshakes made in utah) aren't mentioned, and results refer to other definitions of "shake", like earthquakes, so this seems to also be a surprising target consarn _{(talck) (contirbuton s)} 19:26, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Bath milk

Bath milk → Raw milk (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

weird thing to make a weak nom out of, but life do be like that sometimes

per the creator, the term is mentioned in #australia, but results were instead mostly about milk baths... with the caveat that it did not necessarily refer to that article's definition of a milk bath, as they instead refer to a lot of assorted things that look like or are related to milk, with actual milk only being about the third most common kind of result. even then, it doesn't actually seem to be raw milk, but milk that may or may not have gone through a separate process to be better on a bathtub than venturing down a human's digestive system

this is to say, me have brain ouchie, what do? refine to #australia, retarget to milk bath, hatnote, or do something else? consarn _{(talck) (contirbuton s)} 19:08, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Sweet and condensed milk

Sweet and condensed milk → Condensed milk (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

despite technically being correct (most condensed milk will also be sweet, either by having sugar added to it or by being milk), this doesn't seem to be a plausible phonetic spelling, or a plausible mistake in general. results thought it was a misspelling of "sweetened condensed milk", and "corrected" me accordingly

unrelated, but brigadeiro fucks, you gotta make some if you have some condensed milk on you consarn _{(talck) (contirbuton s)} 18:56, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Puzzle game

Puzzle game → Puzzle (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Puzzle Game → Puzzle video game (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

These two redirects should have the same target. I have a slight preference for Puzzle video game because most links to the two redirects refer to video games. Mathguy2718 (talk) 22:03, 30 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Puzzle games → Puzzle (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Retarget to Puzzle (disambiguation). Targeting a disambiguation page would encourage specific links, which I think would be helpful here. A lot of traditional/physical games could be referred to a puzzles. I'm not convinced video games are the primary topic, particularly since the name of the genre of video games takes its name from traditional/physical games in the first place. The plural, puzzle games, should also be bundled here. – Scyrme (talk) 22:37, 30 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: relisting to bundle Puzzle games as suggested
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Thryduulf (talk) 17:25, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget both (and bundle puzzle games) to Puzzle (disambiguation) NerdyEpiscopalian (talk) 17:48, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Easter dates

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: speedy deleted

Easter 2006

Easter 2006 → Easter (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Delete. Easter 2006 is not discussed here nor at Date of Easter nor at List of dates for Easter, which includes Easter dates from 2016–2036. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 15:16, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Redirect serves no purpose. Frank Anchor 16:40, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Fuun

Fuun → Fun (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

implausible as a tyypo of fun. results were mostly about a seemingly unnotable band, fuun lion-maru, and fuun ishin dai shogun consarn _{(talck) (contirbuton s)} 12:24, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Android 17

Android 17 → Android (operating system) (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

This redirect has been the subject of a long-term edit war between whether it should target the mobile operating system, or an article related to the Dragon Ball character such as Red Ribbon Army#Android 17. I am hence bringing this to RfD discussion to form a consensus. — AP 499D25 (talk) 10:11, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I think the best solution would be to create a disambiguation page between the two, or add a hatnote to one of the following pages. If the latter was to be done, I would likely choose the operating system, as it appears to be the more common topic. 8BitBros (talk • edits) 10:26, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
A disambiguation page makes a lot of sense here-it has clearly been contentious and that method doesn’t set one as a more ‘important’ meaning. I’d agree the operating system is likely relevant to more users and a hatnote on the page for the OS makes sense if a disamb page isn’t the consensus ~Malvoliox (talk | contribs) 14:59, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: My first thought was that the mobile OS is the obvious primary topic, but I don't see that we cover this presumed upcoming release at the current target, nor at Android version history nor at Android 16, the article about the most recent (current) version. I imagine readers do search for information about future Android OS releases but as long as we don't cover it, this redirect doesn't make much sense. MOS:DABMENTION requires that dab pages only list articles that actually mention the topic, so that won't work, either. I easily found some chatter about the Android 17 operating system online so perhaps we can add coverage somewhere and target there. All the incoming links appear to reference the Dragon Ball character so those will need to be addressed depending on the outcome here. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 15:43, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Collectivities

Collectivities → Territorial collectivity (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Collectivity → Territorial collectivity (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Judging by what links to collectivity and what links to connectivities, this doesn't look like the right target. Thepharoah17 (talk) 08:33, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: on a cursory reading, all of the uses in articles look correct to me, with the exception of the usage at Unilineal evolution. It's possible Overseas collectivity is a better target for some of these and perhaps disambiguation is warranted. The instance at Unilineal evolution is the only one that uses an entirely different meaning; this link can be removed.—Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 18:52, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

AI effect in the United States

AI effect in the United States → AI effect#United States (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

The section target is broken and the article doesn't discuss the United States. There are a few related AI articles with sections on the United States including History of artificial intelligence and Artificial intelligence and elections but these only discuss specific effects and not the subject in general, Suonii180 (talk) 08:15, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: too specific, and no existing section "AI effect#United States". Alenoach (talk) 16:27, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I agree with the nom and Alenoach. It's not clear that content could or should be added, anyway. The article describes a general 'effect' that does not operate differently or have unique manifestations in the United States. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 17:11, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Pinky's vocal tics

Poit → Pinky and the Brain (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Zort → Pinky and the Brain (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

These two redirects are of the character Pinky from the show "pinky and the brain"'s vocal tics. Poit has the character explanation but Poit is simply one of Pinky's sayings, not a character from the series. Unlike Narf, another one of his sayings, there are no other meanings mentioned the page besides Pinky and the Brain. ♡Draco Centauros♡ (talk) 07:31, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Greek National Road 61

Greek National Road 61 → Greek National Road 81 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

The redirect should be deleted, because the road number does not exist according to my research in National roads in Greece. The redirect was originally created as a typo of Greek National Road 81. However, given that we now have references for numbered roads in Greece (see {{Cite Greek roads}}), I feel there is no point in keeping the redirect if the number was never allocated in real life. --Minoa (talk) 07:06, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Winterer

Winterer → wiktionary:Special:Search/winterer (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

WP:Wikipedia is not a dictionary Lijil (talk) 05:18, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I think there's a chance it could be redirected to Winterer (surname), where a relevant Wikitionary link can be found; however, I do agree with deleting this page. 8BitBros (talk • edits) 05:26, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget to the surname, as redirect creator. Juwan 🕊️🌈 13:11, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Move the surname page to the base title per WP:MALPLACED. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 16:16, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Move Winterer (surname) to Winterer per WP:MALPLACED, WP:NOTDICT, and WP:SOFTSP. This does not meet the standard for a soft redirect—with zero incoming links, it is not commonly wikified. wikt:Winterer states that the name derives from the word winterer. If there's adequate sourcing for our purposes, the name etymology and definition of winterer can be included in the surname article. The Wiktionary template is already in place at the surname article, which will eventually lead readers to this information. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 18:36, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:April Fools/April Fools' Day 7102

Wikipedia:April Fools/April Fools' Day 7102 → Wikipedia:April Fools/April Fools' Day 2017 (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Let's not joke about the 72nd century, which is more than 5000 years away. GTrang (talk) 04:42, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I think it's safe to say that no one's going to be stumbling upon this. Within the past few years, there have only been a few page views.
On a side note: 7102 is 2017 backwards. 8BitBros (talk • edits) 05:20, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – even if Wikipedia makes it to the year 7102, it is way too early for us to plan for that, since we have to work on April Fools' Day for the years 2027 to 7101 first. And even if 7102 is 2017 backwards, said joke is a bit too obscure. --Minoa (talk) 08:36, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Textur

Textur → Blackletter#Textura (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Textura → Blackletter#Textura (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Textualis → Blackletter#Textura (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

The Textura section and its content no longer exist. ~2026-11614-51 (talk) 03:26, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Blackletter. The word "Textura" still appears nine times in the article, the word "Textualis" still appears 12 times in the article, and the word "Textur" still appears once in the article, so the article itself is still a valid target for the redirects. Nicholas0 (talk) 03:45, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Retarget (un-refine) Textura and Textualis to Blackletter. These terms are used throughout, as noted above, and Textura and Textualis are prominently bolded in the lead. However, Textur needs further consideration. It is a plausible misspelling of Texture and search reveals the partial title match Schistose texturSchistose textur, which is a redirect to Schist. If kept/retargeted, consider adding a hatnote to the article. Tag these as {{R avoided double redirect}} so they stay together in the future. I'm not sure which of these three terms should be treated as the "main" one. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 18:46, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Slap Battles

Slap Battles → List of Roblox games#Slap Battles (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

No longer mentioned; only other mention is in passing at Spilprisen. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 02:06, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Spilprisen#2024 and unlink there; it's hidden in search results so deletion is unhelpful. J 947 ‡ ^edits 02:51, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Blade Ball (Roblox game)

Blade Ball (Roblox game) → List of Roblox games#Blade Ball (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

No longer mentioned. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 02:04, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not helpful in the absence of any discussion on enwiki. J 947 ‡ ^edits 02:47, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Project Lazarus (Roblox game)

Project Lazarus (Roblox game) → List of Roblox games#Project Lazarus (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

No longer mentioned. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 02:03, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not helpful in the absence of any discussion on enwiki. J 947 ‡ ^edits 02:49, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Templates and Modules

Only three main space uses. Already covered by other neutrality templates. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 00:09, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Miscellany

User:Rahimars

A BLP, which is effectively unsourced, by a WP:NOTHERE editor. The Forbes link is a permanent dead link so I'm not counting it as a source. The general consensus at MfD is that unsourced BLPs are deleted. I considered WP:G11 but it's only a couple of sentences that are super promotional. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:13, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Appears to be an unsourced autobiography. BLP and promotional problems. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 13:44, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per G11. This userpage reads as a resume/CV, intended to promote this person and their academic and career achievements, rather than anything about how the user has contributed/will contribute to Wikipedia. I do think this qualifies as "unambiguous promotion".

Regardless, this is effectively a fully unsourced BLP, as the Forbes link given as a "source" doesn't appear to have ever actually worked or existed. I could not find evidence that Forbes has ever had a profile on this person. If others don't think it meets the G11 standard, delete for WP:BLP violations ApexParagon (talk) 16:59, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review

Adam Lanza (closed)

Adam Lanza – Procedural close. This seems an extension of an argument from a confirmed sockpuppet on an account created purely to raise the DRV. Not doing that either. Any DRV requires an established user in good standing. Spartaz ^Humbug! 18:06, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The following is an archived debate of the deletion review of the page above. Please do not modify it.

Per my previous nomination the AFD had a lot of misinterpretation of policy and wasn't over. There still wasn't a clear consensus and despite the sock edits it doesn't make sense how it was a "consensus" to keep when in reality it wasn't. Blackberrybrickbreaker (talk) 14:10, 6 April 2026 (UTC) -->[reply]

The consensus was clear to me. I agree with the closing.--BabbaQ (talk) 14:16, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The afd was 110% still going on and people were starting to vote delete. The keep arguments are flawed and you don't acknowledge WP:PERPETRATOR and other policy's when you say to keep the article.

Either way though there was NOT CONENSUS for keeping the article. I am tired of your WP:BLUDGEONING. Blackberrybrickbreaker (talk) 14:23, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Keep !voters did, in fact, adequately outline WP:PERP compliance. I don't see any flaws in interpreting consensus. As an entirely uninvolved party I think this decision should be upheld. Simonm223 (talk) 15:00, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Endorse. Most of the Delete !votes seem to be based on rationale that has little to do with P&G, and were correctly discounted by the closer. If this is, indeed a WP:REDUNDANTFORK, then a redirect would be how we normally deal with it. Calling for deletion (or even SALTing) rather than the obvious redir or merge suggests that the motives behind some of those votes were perhaps emotional rather than encyclopedic. On the flip side, some of the Keeps also strike me as odd. WP:2MONTHS is an essay about renomination, not a valid retention criterion. But considering the early renomination, I find it fitting to include the views expressed in the first AfD in determining consensus in the second one, landing us even more firmly in Keep territory.
I'm not sure what 110% still going on means. The AfD was closed 7 days, 16 hours and 20 minutes after it was opened. That is indeed 110% of the seven days required by policy. The appellant, whose account was created for the purpose this appeal after their previous attempt yesterday was procedurally closed, would be well advised to tone down their rhetoric, both here and at other venues. A civilized, well-thought-out merge proposal, based on WP:PAGEDECIDE rather than on pure notability, may be the most productive way forward here, but frankly, I have trouble seeing this fly-by-night account going through the process. Owen× ☎ 16:20, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I'll make a merge proposal in 3 months. This account is scheduled for deletion by wiki anyway so it won't be on this account Blackberrybrickbreaker (talk) 17:11, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
until July, I'll be back. but for now, I'm going to stay off this site.Blackberrybrickbreaker (talk) 17:11, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Closer here. To elaborate a little on a few lines of thinking: the argument that a page about a shooter is to be suppressed because it may inspire others carries no weight. Policy and longstanding precedent support NOTCENSORED. "It's not notable" also carries little weight without further elaboration, when there is an article of 3000+ words and 100+ sources: those argument would need to show why the listed sources do not require a standalone page. Finally, a reminder that ONEEVENT arguments must engage with the quantum of coverage, not simply the rationale for notability. ONEEVENT does not mandate deletion of subjects notable for a single event; it mandates considering whether the material is sufficiently covered by an article about the event, allowing for the possibility that it might not be. The arguments based on redundancy I gave full weight to, but they did not have enough support. Vanamonde93 (talk) 17:03, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.

v t e Wikipedia community
For a listing of current collaborations, tasks, and news, see the Community portal. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the Dashboard.
General community topics	Administration News The Signpost Goings-on In the media Meetups Mailing lists Wikipedians Statistics The Wikipedia Library Centralized discussion Village pump Idea lab Policy Proposals Technical Miscellaneous WMF Holidays Bots
Contents and grading	Requested articles Most-wanted articles Images needing articles Articles needing images Articles for creation WP:AFC/R WP:AFC/C Creating articles Help Vital articles Articles for improvement Peer review Good article nominations Featured article candidates Lists Pictures Topics Article translation Pages Main Page Errors
WikiProjects and collaborations	Directory Culture and the arts Geographical History and society Science, technology and engineering Wikipedia assistance and tasks Patrols Recent changes Counter-Vandalism Unit Accessibility Organizations category
Awards and feedback	Reward board Contests A nice cup of tea and a sit down Charitableness WikiLove Compliment before criticism Kindness Campaign Thanks!
Maintenance tasks	Task Center Open tasks Backlog Category Admin category Edit requests Category Database reports Category tracker Dusty articles Special pages New pages Recent changes Controversial issues
Administrators and noticeboards	Administrators' noticeboard Incidents Edit warring Vandalism Admin dashboard Admin requests Closure Page protection User permissions Sockpuppets Open proxies Revision deletion Oversight Request Usernames Changing Title blacklist OTRS Bureaucrats' Requests for adminship and bureaucratship Arbitration Committee Requests Enforcement
Content dispute resolution	Requests for comment Third opinion Dispute resolution noticeboard Biographies of living persons Conflict of interest External links Fringe theories Neutral point of view No original research Reliable sources
Other noticeboards and assistance	Regional notice boards Requests for help Category Asking questions Teahouse Help desk Reference desk Adopt-a-user Copyright assistance Copyright investigations Text problems Media questions Resource requests Mergers History mergers Moves Page importation Spam Blacklist Whitelist Bots Education General sanctions Editor sanctions Long-term abuse
Deletion discussions	Guide Admin Today Articles Templates Files Categories Redirects Miscellany Speedy Proposed BLP Review Undeletion Arguments to avoid Arguments to make Article Rescue
Elections and voting	Requests for comment (meta) Wikimedia Foundation elections WP Democracy Milestones
Directories, indexes, and summaries	Departments Edit summary legend Editor's index Essays FAQs Glossary Abbreviations Help Manual of Style Simplified Rules Five pillars Policies Guidelines Shortcuts Templates Citation templates Tips Today Tools Wiki markup
Media Category Templates

Articles

Files

Categories

NEW NOMINATIONS

Category:European Space Agency modern mission insignia, 2010s

Category:Executed scientists

Category:Austrian tailors

Category:1840s in Baden

Category:Mass shootings involving Glock pistols

Category:Orators

Category:People enslaved in Maine

Medieval mass murders

Category:July 2022 in Fiji

Category:Funeral scandals

Redirects

Utah shake

Bath milk

Sweet and condensed milk

Puzzle game

Easter dates

Easter 2006

Fuun

Android 17

Collectivities

AI effect in the United States

Pinky's vocal tics

Greek National Road 61

Winterer

Wikipedia:April Fools/April Fools' Day 7102

Textur

Slap Battles

Blade Ball (Roblox game)

Project Lazarus (Roblox game)

Templates and Modules

Miscellany

Deletion review

Adam Lanza (closed)