Jump to content

User talk:Sohom Datta

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 2 days ago by JacobTheRox in topic Good article nominations RfC

Tech News: 2026-12

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 19:34, 16 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Notification of administrators without tools

[edit]
Greetings, Sohom Datta. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title:
  • Thank you for supporting this effort. Your contributions are an integral part of overall success, and an example for others to follow.
  • To stop receiving these notifications, remove your name from the list.

TolBot (talk) 21:00, 17 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Notification of administrators without tools

[edit]
Greetings, Sohom Datta. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title:
  • Thank you for supporting this effort. Your contributions are an integral part of overall success, and an example for others to follow.
  • To stop receiving these notifications, remove your name from the list.

TolBot (talk) 21:00, 19 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

March thanks

[edit]
story · music · places

Thank you for improving article quality in March! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:45, 20 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

on Bach's birthday, a story about my joy --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:49, 21 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2026-13

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 16:49, 23 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Permissions review

[edit]

Mindful of WP:MMORPG, I thought the best way to revive a request to restore an autopatrolled bit would be to ask you directly if you could review 13 redirects replaced with a sourced article and 8 new articles started, 6 new redirects added since your first assessment. Articles are added in the interest of filling a gap in coverage in the encyclopedia. You said the AP standards had ballooned, so I will echo that to say I think my ability to launch new articles has improved since the permission was first granted. It appears the revocation came during a total of 1,234 done that morning, and that I am one of the very few in that list who is in fact actively editing in 2026. Please comment, and restore the bit if I have addressed your concerns. Sswonk (talk) 21:54, 25 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Sswonk I haven't looked too deeply through you contributions but based on what I looked at, I was somewhat puzzled by the inclusion of this wordpress blog in West Cross Timbers. Could you explain why you used that as a a source? Sohom (talk) 02:42, 27 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
Citing the Wordpress-hosted site The Rocking Magpie is related to the subject matter, album releases by Americana music artists early in their career. There is limited coverage in main stream or industry media. I do run into other blogs when finding out about the artists' early releases, and following logic and WP guidance I don't use them as sources. The Rocking Magpie is an exception, as the founder Alan Harrison has a history of reviewing for No Depression (magazine) and other publications. He is now suspending that work on his site, but that he publishes his reviews and those of others on Wordpress is the only drawback. The stance for his part is in solidarity with independent musicians, I think that is obvious from reading his opening on the home page of the site.
Hoping not to offend anyone, I feel first hand the futility of writing about something you love rather than something that corporate publications love, and the people who are dedicated to roots and Americana music often are making that conscious choice to eschew wealth and the values associated with it for doing what they love with meaning and authenticity.
Harrison and other writers on that site interview artists, and that particular interview Amanda Shires gives her statement on why what MusicBrainz and Discogs list as her first album is not her "debut" album. She didn't work on the songs on her first CD with the idea of building a solo career, as where her contemporaries would have a "debut" album, she has a technical demonstration of her skills to provide to venues and other musicians. Her albums beginning with West Cross Timbers represent her singer-songwriter work, what her career has become, while Being Brave does not. I found that to be important information for not only people who are studying or want to learn about her career, but also for learning about performers in general on the Texas music circuit.
Although it is hosted by the platform it is, reading The Rocking Magpie is actually good for learning about the element of self-reliance found in Americana music. It is part of the story, I don't think Wikipedia should restrict or ban Harrison et. al references because the site is on Wordpress; he knows his subject. Sswonk (talk) 14:05, 27 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Sswonk So, I looked through your contributions in detail and I currently still don't have the confidence to grant autopatrolled to you. I can take your word that the wordpress blog was written by a subject matter expert but there are similar problems across your newer creations (such as the fact that despite going back and forth with myself, I don't see significant coverage of Boundary County (album) in terms of proving it's notability). You can appeal this decision to other admins or at WP:PERM/AP or at WP:AN but I cannot at this time justify granting AP.
One thing I will note though, is that this lack of confidence is not a reflection of the fact that you are doing bad work, I do recognize that you are doing excellent work in terms of documenting Americana music, some of which can be hard to find sources at times -- it's just that WP:AP tends to work better/is much easier granted to folks who often document obviously notable/demonstrate notability from the get-go. (The bar for which is typically WP:THREE) Sohom (talk) 03:15, 30 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
Reasonable, thank you. Sswonk (talk) 12:39, 30 March 2026 (UTC) Sswonk (talk) 12:39, 30 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Test

[edit]

Here's an edit to thank to see who it notifies, per our discussion about technical quirks. Clevermoss (talk) 20:12, 29 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Test #2. Let me know if the signature needs to be different from what I did. Clevermoss (talk) 21:15, 29 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2026-14

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 19:24, 30 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 31 March 2026

[edit]

Notice

[edit]

Hi Sohom, here is the notice the AN/I page asks be given on your talk page, I am posting there about your interactions on my request in a few minutes, not much just seeking an apology. Sswonk (talk) 14:13, 1 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

The close you just did

[edit]

Just wondering; was the close saying that it's specifically just an "essay", as in not an explanatory essay, or was it just saying there is consensus that it should be classed as some kind of an essay? ⹃Maltazarian parley{\displaystyle \lor }investigate 18:38, 3 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

The latter, not the former Sohom (talk) 19:17, 3 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – April 2026

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2026).

Administrator changes

added
removed

Checkuser changes

removed Giraffer

Oversight changes

added Kj cheetham
removed Giraffer

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

  • Following a motion, the GSCASTE extended-confirmed restriction in the Indian military history case has been narrowed. It now applies to caste-related topics in South Asia, and the preemptive protection remedy has been amended accordingly.
  • The arbitration case Pbsouthwood has been closed.
  • The arbitration case Maghreb has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case will close on 7 April.

Tech News: 2026-15

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 16:17, 6 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Notification of administrators without tools

[edit]
Greetings, Sohom Datta. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title:
  • Thank you for supporting this effort. Your contributions are an integral part of overall success, and an example for others to follow.
  • To stop receiving these notifications, remove your name from the list.

TolBot (talk) 21:01, 6 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Notification of administrators without tools

[edit]
Greetings, Sohom Datta. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title:
  • Thank you for supporting this effort. Your contributions are an integral part of overall success, and an example for others to follow.
  • To stop receiving these notifications, remove your name from the list.

TolBot (talk) 21:00, 11 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2026-16

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 15:17, 13 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

WikiSignals

[edit]

Hi!

I heard from Clovermoss that you had feedback about WikiSignals. I'm one of the developers and would be delighted to hear your feedback on how we can improve. Feel free to share on the project talk page.

Thank you for your time! Localmotion127 (talk) 14:29, 17 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Localmotion127 I guess the question I have is "who/what are you building for". I was genuinely puzzled at the methodology y'all have chosen (i.e. say Tranco-metrics in the older version of the tool) and who y'all were targeting (my understanding is that the editor community isn't that interested in the Tranco-ranking of the site) ? I was playing around with the newer version and I'm still very much struggling to understand what these scores actually mean and how I should interpret them/how they can be significant to say WP:NPP folks or even other content creators. Sohom (talk) 01:09, 20 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
Good question. We envisioned two use cases to start: Wiki editors wanting to know whether a source that they plan to cite could be considered as reliable, and Wiki editors examining citations already in a Wiki article to determine their reliability.
From personal experience, if I find a source I've never heard of before, I want to learn more about it. I would want to know, for example, if it's in lists of sources known to be unreliable (such as from the Perennial Sources list or Media Bias Fact Check), or how popular that source is, or when its website was registered. But I would need to do several separate searches to get this info, so it would be nice to have it all in one place. This is what WikiSignals is meant to be, an OSINT aggregator of publicly-available info about sources.
Regarding Tranco, we chose it as an open source alternative to the now-deprecated Alexa for measuring web traffic. How useful it would be depends on the situation. A spam source that's impersonating a well-known reliable source could be registered very recently and have low web traffic. These data points strongly hurt that source's credibility. On the other hand, Facebook is over two decades old and highly popular, but neither of those points are enough for it to be a reliable source.
I'm not too familiar with WP:NPP, so I'll hold off on making a usability judgment for now.
To your point, we can definitely revise the intro/methodology to make this all more clear. Hope this is helpful, and if there's anything else we can clarify, feel free to let us know anytime! Localmotion127 (talk) 12:35, 24 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Sohom Datta, I'm another WikiSignal-er, your questions are helpful. We are building it, at first, to help Wikipedia editors evaluate reference reliability. But soon we expect it will be used by mis-disinfo researchers (as have our other projects, from which WikiSignals grew), and by journalists and the public. Our data is freely available as HTML pages and JSON via a REST API.
We have info on 70K+ domains, broken down into two general categories: domain data (e.g., Tranco, Wayback Machine captures, registration date, etc.) and credibility indicators (e.g., from ratings agencies and Wikimedia RSP/Spam/Fake-news lists). The former, like Tranco, do not factor into cred-estimates, but are still informative for users. The latter we use to estimate domain-level source credibility, the scoring of which we are just starting to dev, and is as yet undocumented. (Thus your struggle to understand: We apologize, docs coming soon.)
The original cred-scores come from Media Bias/Fact Check and Domain Quality. But we now have other enough data to generate our own WikiSignal score, via weighted averages of all a domain's cred-signals, including new ones like press-associations and inclusion in vetted media indices, which we can statistically demonstrate are accurate cred-signals. That's where we are now. Please continue to quiz and question us. Hearvox (talk) 20:05, 23 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2026-17

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 14:59, 20 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

April thanks

[edit]
story · music · places

Thank you for improving article quality in April! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:18, 20 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Not a lot but Tray Wellington might be a interesting read for you! Sohom (talk) 16:48, 20 April 2026 (UTC)Reply
Yes, it is, thank you! - Today's story is about one of three bios I brought to today's main page: look and listen, an extraordinary woman in many respects. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:58, 30 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 21 April 2026

[edit]

May 2026 Administrator Elections – Schedule

[edit]

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:04, 22 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Notification of administrators without tools

[edit]
Greetings, Sohom Datta. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title:
  • Thank you for supporting this effort. Your contributions are an integral part of overall success, and an example for others to follow.
  • To stop receiving these notifications, remove your name from the list.

TolBot (talk) 21:00, 24 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Notification of administrators without tools

[edit]
Greetings, Sohom Datta. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title:
  • Thank you for supporting this effort. Your contributions are an integral part of overall success, and an example for others to follow.
  • To stop receiving these notifications, remove your name from the list.

TolBot (talk) 21:00, 25 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Notification of administrators without tools

[edit]
Greetings, Sohom Datta. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title:
  • Thank you for supporting this effort. Your contributions are an integral part of overall success, and an example for others to follow.
  • To stop receiving these notifications, remove your name from the list.

TolBot (talk) 21:00, 26 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Good Article Gazette, Issue 13

[edit]
Logo: Good Article Gazette - the official GAN newsletter
Logo: Good Article Gazette - the official GAN newsletter
Issue 13, 27 April 2026
Ongoing discussionsNewsCurrent statistics
  • The Good Article Gazette is back after a two month break!
  • Number of GAs: 43,784 (+338)
  • Number of nominations: 951 (+110)
  • GAs for reassessment: 64 (+18)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:00, 27 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2026-18

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 18:04, 27 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

May 2026 Administrator Election – Call for Candidates

[edit]

The administrator elections process has officially started! Interested editors are encouraged to self-nominate or arrange to be nominated by reviewing the instructions at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/May 2026/Candidates.

Here is the schedule:

  • April 29 – May 5: Call for candidates
  • May 8–12: Discussion phase
  • May 13–19: SecurePoll voting phase

Please note the following:

  • The requirements to run are identical to RFA—a prospective candidate must be extended confirmed.
  • Prospective candidates are advised to become familiar with the community's expectations of administrators, which are much higher than the minimum requirement of having extended confirmed status. This includes reviewing successful and unsuccessful RFAs, reading the essay Wikipedia:Advice for admin elections candidates, and possibly requesting an optional poll on their chances of passing.
  • The process will have a seven day call for candidates phase, a two day pause, a five day discussion phase, and a seven day private vote using SecurePoll. Discussion and questions are only allowed on the candidate pages during the discussion phase.
  • The outcome of this process is identical to making a request for adminship. There is no official difference between an administrator appointed through RFA versus administrator elections.
  • Administrator elections are also a valid means of regaining adminship for de-sysopped editors.

Ask any questions about the process at the talk page. Later, a user talk message will be sent to official candidates with additional information about the process.

If you are interested in the process, please make sure to watchlist the appropriate pages. A watchlist notice will be added when the discussion phase opens, and again when the voting phase opens.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

New pages patrol May 2026 Backlog drive

[edit]
May 2026 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
  • On 1 May 2026, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each review will earn 1 point.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:24, 29 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup 2026 May newsletter

[edit]

The second round of the 2026 WikiCup ended on 28 April. As a reminder for contestants who just joined or are unaware of recent changes to our round-points system, good article nomination reviews now receive 10 points, an increase from 5 points in the previous year, as per a consensus at WT:CUP. Peer reviews, which continue to be worth 5 points, are now listed in the same section as featured article candidate reviews, rather than with good article reviews. Everyone who competed in round 2 will advance to round 3 unless they have withdrawn or been banned. No other changes to the round-point system have been made for this year.

Round 2 was competitive. Three contestants scored more than 1,000 round points; nine scored over 500; and fourteen scored over 300. The top seven contestants had at least one featured article (two of them with two apiece). The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:

The full scores for round 2 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 12 featured articles, 13 featured lists, 2 featured-topic articles, 106 good articles, 22 good-topic articles and more than 40 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 3 In the News articles, and they have conducted over 200 reviews. The tournament points table has been updated.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 April but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed in Round 3. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:49, 29 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Case Closed

[edit]

Hi @Sohom Datta:, thank you for taking the time to look at my case. I strongly suspect those accounts are sockpuppetry or meatpuppetry, but I see that I didnt properly submitted the case. It was my first case ever. Would it be appropriate to open another one? Thank you! diff RevivedCicero (talk) 03:19, 2 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

@RevivedCicero You submitted diffs from 2007 and compared them to behavior in 2026, 20 years later. Also, only one of the edits are from the person you accused every other edit is from a different editor who does not appear to be related? Sohom (talk) 03:58, 2 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Sohom Datta Yeah, I see. I did it wrong. Thanks for your time! RevivedCicero (talk) 05:34, 2 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
Hi @Sohom Datta:, I appreciate you work but I have clearly explained it to you several times that there is no AI invloved in my submission. I am not quite sure why do you keep insisting that it is AI generated? I know that this is my first submission and it might not be perfect but I guaranty you that there is no AI involved in it. All you do is copy the link, paste, and put it in the brackets [(paste the link)diff] give the explanation, evidence, so why would I need AI to do that? It might not be perfect because it is my first submission, and I use my Iphone to do that, but it is not AI generated.
I will work on the weekend to respond to the submission, so please keep it on hold if you do not mind. Thanks! RevivedCicero (talk) 03:54, 12 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
@RevivedCicero: I don't think either me or @Vanjagenije have any problems with waiting. My justification in the SPI was purely in relation to why I at that time thought it was AI. While I'm willing to concede that it might not be AI, as I've said in the SPI, I'm skeptical that there is anything significant here, since based on a cursory look the report appeared to be a extension of this dispute thread where you were already told that your suspicions didn't make sense. However, I'm willing to WP:AGF and let you have a week to figure your way out here and provide evidence to the contrary/disprove me and actually prove a association here. Sohom (talk) 04:39, 12 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
Turns out I did not actually say what I was skeptical about in my SPI comment, so apologies on not being clear enough, but per above, what I meant to say in the SPI was: It is possible that there was no actual AI involved and this is just an artifact of a newbie being newbie but I [still] am sceptical [of the filing]. [sic] Sohom (talk) 04:45, 12 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

spihelper user agent

[edit]

Hi,

re: this edit, the syntax is new mw.Api({userAgent: 'GNs SPIHelper userscript'}). Passing a string won't break the script (since a string is a kind of object, so it will more or less be interpreted as new mw.Api({})) but won't do anything useful either. Tgr (WMF) (talk) 11:16, 3 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

{{fixed}}, thanks for raising this! Sohom (talk) 13:59, 3 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – May 2026

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2026).

Administrator changes

readded
removed

Interface administrator changes

removed L235
added Chaotic Enby

CheckUser changes

removed

Oversight changes

removed Moneytrees

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • Changes to user permissions made from Meta are now included in the local user permissions log (T6055).
  • The autoconfirmed user group will soon be modified such that the four-day account age requirement begins when an account makes its first edit (T418484).

Arbitration

  • The arbitration case SchroCat has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case closed on 15 April.
  • Per a recent motion, appeals of blocks from the conflict-of-interest VRT queue are, by default, appealed on-wiki through the normal unblock process. However, they may be heard by the Committee if COIVRTers disagree on the interpretation of the evidence or believe ArbCom would be better suited to hear the appeal. Administrators are also advised that loosening or lifting such blocks without the consent of someone with access to the queue or ArbCom can be grounds for desysopping.
  • Per a recent motion, restrictions issued directly by the Committee may now be enforced with blocks which work exactly like contentious topic blocks.
  • The arbitration case Maghreb has been closed.

Miscellaneous


Tech News: 2026-19

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:42, 4 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Request to reconsider partial block (User:Ramb70)

[edit]

Hello Sohom, I am writing this to apologize for the use of LLM/AI tools in my previous edits. I am a student and a new editor on Wikipedia, and I honestly did not realize that using AI-generated text was against the community's policies.

I have spent the last few days learning how to find reliable independent sources manually. I have found multiple news reports from Dainik Jagran, Dainik Bhaskar, and Zee News for my draft on "Brihaspati Dham, Jaipur". I am committed to writing all my future contributions in my own words and following the Manual of Style.

Could you please consider lifting the partial block? I would like to show that I can be a constructive editor without using AI. Thank you for your time and guidance. Ramb70 (talk) 16:54, 5 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

ccing what I've said on your talk page: You can improve drafts without a unblock. My position here is that you need to show a positive track record to be unblocked. I do not see that in your current draft submission -- Sohom (talk) 23:09, 5 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
I understand your point. I have just submitted the draft with significant improvements to demonstrate my commitment to the platform's standards. Please review it whenever you have a moment. Ramb70 (talk) 04:49, 8 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
I understand your point. I have just submitted the draft with significant improvements to demonstrate my commitment to the platform's standards. Please review it whenever you have a moment. Ramb70 (talk) 15:51, 9 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

May 2026 Administrator Elections – Discussion Phase

[edit]

The discussion phase of the May 2026 administrator elections is officially open. As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

  • May 8–12: Discussion phase (we are here)
  • May 13–19: SecurePoll voting phase
  • Scrutineering phase

We are currently in the discussion phase. The candidate subpages are open to questions and comments from everyone, in the same style as a request for adminship. You may discuss the candidates at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/May 2026/Discussion phase.

On 13 May, we will start the voting phase. The candidate subpages will close to public questions and discussion, and everyone will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for.

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

-- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:22, 8 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

PROD in PageTriageUserspaceLogger

[edit]

Hi Sohom, this came up again today and it's possible you missed the question as it's on a subpage: User talk:Sohom Datta/PageTriageUserspaceLogger#PROD logged to XfD log ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · email · global) 07:21, 11 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

I will take a look, I know the last time I took a look at this, my reaction was "PageTriage itself has a race condition somewhere" in which case, it's time to open a ticket. Sohom (talk) 09:58, 11 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2026-20

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 19:19, 11 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

May 2026 Administrator Elections – Voting Phase

[edit]

The voting phase of the May 2026 administrator elections has started and will continue until 19 May 2026 at 23:59 UTC. You can participate in the voting phase at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/May 2026/Voting phase.

As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

  • May 13–19: SecurePoll voting phase (we are here)
  • Scrutineering phase

In the voting phase, the candidate subpages close to public questions and discussion, and everyone who qualifies to vote has a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's vote total during the election. The suffrage requirements are similar to those at RFA.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for a few days, perhaps longer. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page (this is a good page to watchlist), and transcluded to the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a non-recall candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and a minimum of 20 support votes. Recall candidates must achieve 55.0% support. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 13 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

New Page Patrol Newsletter - May 2026

[edit]

Hello Sohom Datta,

New Page Review queue November 2025 - May 2026

Backlog update

At the time of this message, there are 15,282 articles and 32,951 redirects awaiting review.

After the January–February drive the article backlog was reduced to 15,179 articles and the redirect backlog to 19,053 respectively. Great job! However, both queues are growing rapidly and any additional reviews are highly appreciated.

2024 and 2025 NPP Awards

JTtheOG was selected as the NPP reviewer of the year for both 2024 and 2025, for reviewing the most articles amongst all reviewers.

Hey man im josh and MPGuy2824 won the Redirect Ninja Master Award for 2024 and 2025 respectively, for reviewing the most redirects.

Overall in 2024, one Platinum, two Gold, eight Silver, 12 Bronze and 45 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 66 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year. In 2025, one Platinum, ten Silver, 13 Bronze and 38 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 38 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year.

BoyTheKingCanDance, Rosiestep, SunDawn, and Vanderwaalforces were inducted into the NPP Hall of Fame for having two separate years of 2,000+ article reviews.

January–February backlog drive

The experimental two-month long backlog drive concluded with 183 reviewers patrolling over 27,761 articles and 35,309 redirects, earning over 36,836 points. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 6,484.6 points in this drive.

May backlog drive

An article-only backlog drive is currently underway. We are hoping to make a big dent in the backlog. You can read more about it or join at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/May 2026.

PageTriage

An attempt was made to get the New Pages Feed to sort by date marked as reviewed instead of date created. However we had to revert it due to bugs. We may try again in the future. You can subscribe to the Phabricator ticket if you're interested in following along.

Reminders:

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:38, 14 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Tray Wellington

[edit]

On 17 May 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tray Wellington, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Tray Wellington was a part of the black reclamation of banjo music? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tray Wellington. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Tray Wellington), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 17 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2026-21

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:20, 18 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Notification of administrators without tools

[edit]
Greetings, Sohom Datta. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title:
  • Thank you for supporting this effort. Your contributions are an integral part of overall success, and an example for others to follow.
  • To stop receiving these notifications, remove your name from the list.

TolBot (talk) 21:00, 18 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Good Article Gazette, Issue 14

[edit]
Logo: Good Article Gazette - the official GAN newsletter
Logo: Good Article Gazette - the official GAN newsletter
Issue 14, 18 May 2026
Ongoing discussionsNewsCurrent statistics
  • The next GAN backlog drive will be held in June and will be co-ordinated by four editors. It will be mainly targeted towards those who are new to reviewing.
  • Number of GAs: 43,883 (+99)
  • Number of nominations: 980 (+29)
  • GAs for reassessment: 74 (+10)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:56, 18 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

May thanks

[edit]
story · music · places

Thank you for improving article quality in May! - Today: Felicity Lott. If you have little time, just give me a click ;) - If you have more, see her story. If you have more, listen to her singing Friendly Vision. If you have more, listen until she sings the word "peace" (Frieden), floating up high, serenely. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:56, 20 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 22 May 2026

[edit]
  • Recent research: WikiLambda the Ultimate
    Does Abstract Wikipedia help fight "One ring to rule them all" solutions for knowledge access - or does it implement one itself?
  • Gallery: Earth Day and Mother's Day
    Earth Day was on 22 April, and Mother's Day was on 10 May (in the US and many other countries).

Tech News: 2026-22

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 21:51, 25 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

June 2026 GAN Backlog Drive

[edit]
Good article nominations | June 2026 Backlog Drive
June 2026 Backlog Drive:

Do you want to become more experienced in the GA process?

  • On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles reviewed.
  • Mentors are available, and new reviewers (<6 reviews) get bonus points!

Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.

Other ways to participate:
You're receiving this message because you have participated in a good article review this year or participated in the previous backlog drive.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:59, 25 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Triple negative

[edit]

Regarding this edit: I'm not quite sure, but I think you might have one negative too many in I do not think W205 is not a negative behavioral example in terms of collaboration. Or perhaps I'm misunderstanding your intent. isaacl (talk) 20:59, 28 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Yep, too many negatives (I think it is a good example). Sohom (talk) 21:03, 28 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Teamwork barnstar

[edit]
Teamwork barnstar

For the impressive collective quantity of content in Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Archives/2026-05-22 generated by a large number of people for a single Signpost issue, and which was published on time. ↠Pine () 04:31, 30 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Request

[edit]

I would request you to take a look at SPI Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rahil1610 which you handled earlier. This SPI has been languishing a while now. Thanks. Orientls (talk) 14:15, 31 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – June 2026

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2026).

Administrator changes

added
readded
removed

Bureaucrat changes

removed

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • Mandatory 2FA for bureaucrats: Bureaucrats without two-factor authentication (2FA) enabled have already lost access to their advanced rights on 26 May. Those who do not enable 2FA may be automatically removed from the groups in mid-June 2026, and from that point onward, new members must have 2FA enabled before they can be added. (T423119, T423120)

Arbitration

  • The arbitration case SchroCat has been closed.
  • The arbitration case Michael Jackson has opened. Evidence submissions in this case closes on 1 June.

Miscellaneous


Good Article Gazette, Issue 15

[edit]
Logo: Good Article Gazette - the official GAN newsletter
Logo: Good Article Gazette - the official GAN newsletter
Issue 15, 1 June 2026
Ongoing discussionsNewsCurrent statistics
  • Number of GAs: 43,915 (+32)
  • Number of nominations: 1033 (+53)
  • GAs for reassessment: 42 (–32)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:03, 1 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2026-23

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 21:07, 1 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

DCWC call for coordinators

[edit]
The Developing Countries WikiContest Gold Belt Buckle
The Developing Countries WikiContest Gold Belt Buckle

Hey Sohom Datta, it's almost that time again! The Developing Countries WikiContest will be returning for its third year, and the coordinator team is looking for experienced content contributors willing to volunteer. The coordinators are responsible for keeping the contest running and its pagesincluding participants' submissions, the points leaderboard, and the list of eligible articlesupdated.

If you would like to apply, please contact one of the coordinators; you may choose to do so privately if you wish: Arconning (talk · email), sawyer777 (talk · email), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · email). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 22:25, 3 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

You have been pruned from a list

[edit]

Hi Sohom Datta! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at User:SodiumBot/mms test, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 1 day.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting User:SodiumBot/mms test.

Thank you!

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk|contribs) 18:01, 8 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2026-24

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 21:28, 8 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Why Block Until September

[edit]

Why until September? Bit harsh for someone who didn’t know they couldn’t actually talk on their talk page. Also, I am unable to use my talk page even though I thought I was doing good, but now I’m fully blocked from it. I had to use an alternative account to ask why. I do not want a punishment following this. ~2026-34962-91 (talk) 16:29, 15 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2026-25

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 16:47, 15 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

The DCWC is back!

[edit]
The Developing Countries WikiContest Gold Belt Buckle
The Developing Countries WikiContest Gold Belt Buckle

Hey Sohom Datta, the Developing Countries WikiContest is back for a third year, and sign-ups are now open! The contest will run from 1 July to 30 September, and the objective remains the same: improve as many articles relating to developing countries as you can to help fight systemic bias on Wikipedia.

Thanks to everyone who answered the call for coordinators, and please welcome the new faces on the coordinator team: the 2024 Gold Belt Buckle winner Generalissima (talk · contribs); and the record-holder for most India-related submissions in 2024, Magentic Manifestations (talk · contribs)! Following feedback from last year, adjustments have been made to the scoring rules; discussion can be found on the contest talk page.

If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or contact one of the coordinators: Arconning (talk · contribs), Generalissima (talk · contribs), Magentic Manifestations (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list. Sent via MediaWiki message delivery.) TechnoSquirrel69 (talk) 16:00, 20 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 21 June 2026

[edit]

June music

[edit]
story · music · places

Thank you for improving article quality in June! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:00, 21 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2026-26

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 13:03, 23 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Small improvement

[edit]

Could your remove the (replacing Yapperbot) text from SodiumBot's messages, such as those about RfC feedback requests? i think it's been there for long enough. FaviFake (talk) 09:49, 28 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

 Done Sohom (talk) 21:05, 28 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Why was User:Yapperbot killed from pruning?

[edit]

It hasn't pruned Wikipedia:WikiProject_Actors_and_Filmmakers#Participants for a good while now, I see many indeffed users who have not edited in years. On the userpage, it says it's been killed from this purpose. Why? jolielover♥talk 11:26, 29 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Jolielover, Yapperbot's pruner function is run through User:SodiumBot now since the previous maintainer was unresponsive and the old bot required percussive maintenance to keep working. Re that specific page, I've fixed one of the params that was incorrectly set which should allow SodiumBot to prune the list on their next pruner run. Sohom (talk) 13:16, 29 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thanks! jolielover♥talk 13:26, 29 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2026-27

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 11:46, 29 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup 2026 July newsletter

[edit]

The third round of the 2026 WikiCup ended on 28 June at 23:59 (UTC). As a reminder, good article nomination reviews now receive 10 points, while peer reviews, which continue to be worth 5 points, are now listed in the same section as featured article candidate reviews, rather than with good article reviews. Everyone who competed in round 3 will advance to round 4 unless they have withdrawn or been banned. No other changes to the round-point system have been made for this year.

Round 3 was competitive. Three contestants scored more than 1,000 round points; eight scored over 500; and thirteen scored over 300. The top three contestants had at least one featured article (two of them with two apiece). The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:

  • MCE89 (submissions) with 1567 points, mainly from good and featured articles about Australian people and geography, as well as some article reviews
  • Ohio Bgsu98 (submissions) with 1547 points, mainly from good articles, featured articles, featured lists, and a good topic about figure skating, along with 20 article reviews
  • Reconrabbit (submissions) with 1004 points, mainly from a high-multiplier featured article on European rabbit and several good articles, DYKs, and reviews
  • A.Cython (submissions) with 1004 points, mainly from good articles about warfare, along with 22 article reviews
  • Generalissima (submissions) with 859 points, mainly from good and featured articles about rivers and East Asian topics

The full scores for round 3 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 12 featured articles, 12 featured lists, 7 featured-topic articles, 117 good articles, 74 good-topic articles and more than 30 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 13 In the News articles, and they have conducted nearly 180 reviews. The tournament points table has been updated.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 June but before the start of Round 4 can be claimed in Round 4. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 29 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

The DCWC is open!

[edit]
See a    "developing" or    "least developed" country? Write about it to earn points!

Hey Sohom Datta, the third annual Developing Countries WikiContest is now open for submissions. The coordinators have addressed some of the queries at the last contest and we are hopeful that it'll turn out great! If you haven't done so already, please review the following:

On behalf of the coordinators, we hope you enjoy participating and wish you the best of luck! If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Arconning (talk · contribs), Generalissima (talk · contribs), Magentic Manifestations (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list. Sent via MediaWiki message delivery.) TechnoSquirrel69 (talk) 00:00, 1 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – July 2026

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2026).

Administrator changes

added
removed

CheckUser changes

readded
removed

Oversight changes

readded
removed L235

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


You're invited to the Mentorship noticeboard

[edit]

Hi, Sohom Datta. You are cordially invited to the brand new Wikipedia:Mentorship noticeboard. I get the impression sometimes that we mentors are each toiling in our own cubbyhole or hamster wheel, quietly answering mentee questions with little to no interaction with other mentors. I think we have a lot to share and learn from each other, and I know it will make me feel better just having the opportunity to interact with you and other mentors there, and I hope it will for you, too. Looking forward to hearing your feedback. Please take the § Survey when you get there! Mathglot (talk) 00:42, 5 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2026-28

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 13:55, 6 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Good Article Gazette, Issue 16

[edit]
Logo: Good Article Gazette - the official GAN newsletter
Logo: Good Article Gazette - the official GAN newsletter
Issue 16, 7 July 2026
Ongoing discussionsNewsCurrent statistics
  • Number of GAs: 44,338 (+423)
  • Number of nominations: 906 (-127)
  • GAs for reassessment: 34 (-8)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 7 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Lakers96 has a sockpuppet account

[edit]

Lakers96 is socking more accounts and it's @Frenchfry1203. Please block his account. ~2026-39263-46 (talk) 23:01, 11 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

You forgot another TA of Lakers96 to block.

[edit]

Also block ~2026-26101-43. This user is also still Lakers96. ~2026-39263-46 (talk) 21:48, 12 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 13 July 2026

[edit]
  • News and notes: An exclusive club
    Wikipedia Co-Founder Larry Sanger gets a community ban for canvassing.
  • In the media: Battle for a soul – who won?
    Commissars, winners and losers, blocks or bans, a Wiki red card, social engineering on wikis, and Swift action!

Tech News: 2026-29

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 16:09, 13 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Lakers96 is block evading again.

[edit]

Lakers is back to his sockpuppetry and keeps vandalising templates. He has another TA named ~2026-40003-83 Please block his account. ~2026-39922-13 (talk) 13:40, 16 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Articles for Creation backlog drive

[edit]

Hello Sohom Datta:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive in August!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than a month of outstanding reviews from the current 3+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 August 2026 through 31 August 2026.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 5000 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 19 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

May 2026 Administrator Elections – RFC Phase

[edit]

The RFC phase of the May 2026 administrator elections has started. There are 20 RFCs for consideration. You can participate in the RFC phase at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/May 2026/RFC phase.

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:02, 20 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Good Article Gazette, Issue 17

[edit]
Logo: Good Article Gazette - the official GAN newsletter
Logo: Good Article Gazette - the official GAN newsletter
Issue 17, 21 July 2026
Ongoing discussionsNewsCurrent statistics
  • Number of GAs: 44,471 (+133)
  • Number of nominations: 921 (+15)
  • GAs for reassessment: 26 (-8)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 21 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2026-30

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 05:44, 21 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Help regarding Tool

[edit]

Hi Sohom, recently I have granted afc participants. While I am reviewing draft, I am facing problem of reviewing ai content. Is there any tool through which I can detect ai content effortlessly? Nomadwikiholic1 (talk) 14:30, 21 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Nomadwikiholic1 There really isn't WP:AISIGNS is what I'll recommend you read to get better at detecting AI-gen content. Sohom (talk) 04:03, 2 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Categorization of AE protection actions needed (21 July 2026)

[edit]

Hello Sohom Datta,

I'm a bot that helps log arbitration enforcement (AE) protection actions on behalf of the Arbitration Committee. As a result of a September 2025 motion by the Arbitration Committee, administrators are no longer required to manually log AE protection actions. Instead, this bot is responsible for logging AE protections to the AE protection log.

While logging AE protections, this bot detected that you recently took the following page protection actions. These action(s) seemed to be AE actions based on the edit summaries, but the bot wasn't able to tell which arbitration case they related to:

If these were AE actions, please take a moment to log the appropriate topic code at the AE protection log. If they were not, feel free to remove the actions from the AE protection log, and optionally let the bot operator know about the false positives.

Going forward, in order to help this bot categorize AE actions, please include a link to the contentious topic under which the action was taken in the protection edit summary (for example, [[WP:CT/BLP]] or [[Wikipedia:Contentious topics/Biographies of Living Persons]]).

If you have any questions, please feel free to reach out to the bot operator or to the arbitration clerks at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard.

Thank you! ClerkBot (talk) 23:56, 21 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppetry

[edit]

This has been a sockpuppet of Huynhthiminhngoc99! ~2026-41431-88 (talk) 09:58, 24 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Listing for discussion of Template:LLM prompt and response

[edit]

icon Template:LLM prompt and response has been listed for discussion, which may result in the template being merged or deleted by consensus. You are invited to comment on the proposed action at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. CapnZapp (talk) 10:03, 24 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2026-31

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 18:47, 27 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Good Article Gazette, Special issue

[edit]
Logo: Good Article Gazette - the official GAN newsletter
Logo: Good Article Gazette - the official GAN newsletter
Special issue - 28 July 2026
With several major discussions underway
Ongoing discussionsCurrent statistics
  • Number of GAs: 44,523 (+52)
  • Number of nominations: 954 (+33)
  • GAs for reassessment: 26 (-8)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:05, 28 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

DCWC August update

[edit]

The 2026 Developing Countries WikiContest has been running for a month now, so let's check in with the competition so far!

As of the time of writing, our top contestants are:

  1. Nigeria Vanderwaalforces (submissions) ahead of the pack with 715 points, with two FAs and many GAs on the monarchs of the Kingdom of Benin;
  2. Simongraham (submissions) with 291 points, mostly with GAs on jumping spiders, alongside various GAN and FAC reviews;
  3. Jaguarnik (submissions) with 240 points, mostly from an FA on the 1945 film Ivan the Terrible;
  4. Grnrchst (submissions) with 215 points, mostly from GAs on anarchist history in various countries, alongside many GA reviews, and;
  5. Vestrian24Bio (submissions) tied for 4th with 215 points, with an FL and four GAs on Indian cricket!

These competitors are in the lead, but if past experience is any indication, big shake-ups might still await us in the contest. If you're looking for a way to boost your position, we got a table of review requests from fellow participants—you can rack up a lot of points through reviews, and it might just convince others to review your own nominations! You can also look through the eligible reviews page to find other articles to review, with highlights for articles eligible for the 1.5× multiplier. The coordinators would like to thank Jaguarnik (submissions) for his work to keep this page up to date.

Thank you so much for all your work in the contest so far, dear participants, and keep on the good fight against systemic bias on our wiki! Have any questions? Leave a message on the contest talk page or send it to one of our wonderful coordinators: Arconning (talk · contribs), Generalissima (talk · contribs), Magentic Manifestations (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), and TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list. Sent via MediaWiki message delivery.) Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 05:25, 2 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

The Signpost: 2 August 2026

[edit]
  • On the bright side: The beautiful game
    2026 Men's FIFA World Cup, Wikimania music, and wikipress.
  • Traffic report: Odyssey and Oyarzabal
    To take you in the sun to (Ithaca), to show you the World Cup, it's the time of the season for editing!

Notification of administrators without tools

[edit]
Greetings, Sohom Datta. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title:
  • Thank you for supporting this effort. Your contributions are an integral part of overall success, and an example for others to follow.
  • To stop receiving these notifications, remove your name from the list.

TolBot (talk) 21:00, 2 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Tech News: 2026-32

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 19:44, 3 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Teamwork Barnstar
Cheers to joining the outspoken Wikipedians club. Our words matter more than we think, even when we're dismissed. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 21:26, 6 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Administrators' newsletter – August 2026

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2026).

Administrator changes

added
removed

CheckUser changes

readded

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Miscellaneous


Tech News: 2026-33

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:43, 10 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Good article nominations RfC

[edit]

Hi Sohom Datta,

There is an ongoing Request for Comment (RfC) at Wikipedia:Good article nominations/August 2026 RfC, which you may be interested in because in the past year, you have nominated or reviewed more than one good article nomination. This message has also been sent to all subscribers to the Good Article Gazette. The RfC contains many proposals (33 at the time of writing), which are split into the following categories: nominators, reviewers, reviews, volunteer roles, reviewing initiatives, and others. However, you are more than welcome to add any proposals of your own that you wish to put to the community.

By the end of September, all the proposals will have been closed by an uninvolved editor, either as a consensus for one of the options or with no consensus. At this point, editors will be invited again to develop these proposals into coherent policy and implement them.

Thank you for your contributions to the good articles project, and I look forward to your input! (in solidarity), JacobTheRox(talk|contributions) 16:03, 11 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

User talk:Sohom Datta
Morty Proxy This is a proxified and sanitized view of the page, visit original site.