Jump to content

Projective tensor product

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In functional analysis, an area of mathematics, the projective tensor product of two locally convex topological vector spaces is a natural topological vector space structure on their tensor product. Namely, given locally convex topological vector spaces {\displaystyle X} and {\displaystyle Y}, the projective topology, or π-topology, on {\displaystyle X\otimes Y} is the strongest topology which makes {\displaystyle X\otimes Y} a locally convex topological vector space such that the canonical map {\displaystyle (x,y)\mapsto x\otimes y} (from {\displaystyle X\times Y} to {\displaystyle X\otimes Y}) is continuous. When equipped with this topology, {\displaystyle X\otimes Y} is denoted {\displaystyle X\otimes _{\pi }Y} and called the projective tensor product of {\displaystyle X} and {\displaystyle Y}. It is a particular instance of a topological tensor product.

Definitions

[edit]

Let {\displaystyle X} and {\displaystyle Y} be locally convex topological vector spaces. Their projective tensor product {\displaystyle X\otimes _{\pi }Y} is the unique locally convex topological vector space with underlying vector space {\displaystyle X\otimes Y} having the following universal property:[1]

For any locally convex topological vector space {\displaystyle Z}, if {\displaystyle \Phi _{Z}} is the canonical map from the vector space of bilinear maps {\displaystyle X\times Y\to Z} to the vector space of linear maps {\displaystyle X\otimes Y\to Z}, then the image of the restriction of {\displaystyle \Phi _{Z}} to the continuous bilinear maps is the space of continuous linear maps {\displaystyle X\otimes _{\pi }Y\to Z}.

When the topologies of {\displaystyle X} and {\displaystyle Y} are induced by seminorms, the topology of {\displaystyle X\otimes _{\pi }Y} is induced by seminorms constructed from those on {\displaystyle X} and {\displaystyle Y} as follows. If {\displaystyle p} is a seminorm on {\displaystyle X}, and {\displaystyle q} is a seminorm on {\displaystyle Y}, define their tensor product {\displaystyle p\otimes q} to be the seminorm on {\displaystyle X\otimes Y} given by {\displaystyle (p\otimes q)(b)=\inf _{r>0,\,b\in rW}r} for all {\displaystyle b} in {\displaystyle X\otimes Y}, where {\displaystyle W} is the balanced convex hull of the set {\displaystyle \left\{x\otimes y:p(x)\leq 1,q(y)\leq 1\right\}}. The projective topology on {\displaystyle X\otimes Y} is generated by the collection of such tensor products of the seminorms on {\displaystyle X} and {\displaystyle Y}.[2][1] When {\displaystyle X} and {\displaystyle Y} are normed spaces, this definition applied to the norms on {\displaystyle X} and {\displaystyle Y} gives a norm, called the projective norm, on {\displaystyle X\otimes Y} which generates the projective topology.[3]

Properties

[edit]

Throughout, all spaces are assumed to be locally convex. The symbol {\displaystyle X{\widehat {\otimes }}_{\pi }Y} denotes the completion of the projective tensor product of {\displaystyle X} and {\displaystyle Y}.

  • If {\displaystyle X} and {\displaystyle Y} are both Hausdorff then so is {\displaystyle X\otimes _{\pi }Y};[3] if {\displaystyle X} and {\displaystyle Y} are Fréchet spaces then {\displaystyle X\otimes _{\pi }Y} is barelled.[4]
  • For any two continuous linear operators {\displaystyle u_{1}:X_{1}\to Y_{1}} and {\displaystyle u_{2}:X_{2}\to Y_{2}}, their tensor product (as linear maps) {\displaystyle u_{1}\otimes u_{2}:X_{1}\otimes _{\pi }X_{2}\to Y_{1}\otimes _{\pi }Y_{2}} is continuous.[5]
  • In general, the projective tensor product does not respect subspaces (e.g. if {\displaystyle Z} is a vector subspace of {\displaystyle X} then the TVS {\displaystyle Z\otimes _{\pi }Y} has in general a coarser topology than the subspace topology inherited from {\displaystyle X\otimes _{\pi }Y}).[6]
  • If {\displaystyle E} and {\displaystyle F} are complemented subspaces of {\displaystyle X} and {\displaystyle Y,} respectively, then {\displaystyle E\otimes F} is a complemented vector subspace of {\displaystyle X\otimes _{\pi }Y} and the projective norm on {\displaystyle E\otimes _{\pi }F} is equivalent to the projective norm on {\displaystyle X\otimes _{\pi }Y} restricted to the subspace {\displaystyle E\otimes F}. Furthermore, if {\displaystyle X} and {\displaystyle F} are complemented by projections of norm 1, then {\displaystyle E\otimes F} is complemented by a projection of norm 1.[6]
  • Let {\displaystyle E} and {\displaystyle F} be vector subspaces of the Banach spaces {\displaystyle X} and {\displaystyle Y}, respectively. Then {\displaystyle E{\widehat {\otimes }}F} is a TVS-subspace of {\displaystyle X{\widehat {\otimes }}_{\pi }Y} if and only if every bounded bilinear form on {\displaystyle E\times F} extends to a continuous bilinear form on {\displaystyle X\times Y} with the same norm.[7]

Completion

[edit]

In general, the space {\displaystyle X\otimes _{\pi }Y} is not complete, even if both {\displaystyle X} and {\displaystyle Y} are complete (in fact, if {\displaystyle X} and {\displaystyle Y} are both infinite-dimensional Banach spaces then {\displaystyle X\otimes _{\pi }Y} is necessarily not complete[8]). However, {\displaystyle X\otimes _{\pi }Y} can always be linearly embedded as a dense vector subspace of some complete locally convex TVS, which is generally denoted by {\displaystyle X{\widehat {\otimes }}_{\pi }Y}.

The continuous dual space of {\displaystyle X{\widehat {\otimes }}_{\pi }Y} is the same as that of {\displaystyle X\otimes _{\pi }Y}, namely, the space of continuous bilinear forms {\displaystyle B(X,Y)}.[9]

Grothendieck's representation of elements in the completion

[edit]

In a Hausdorff locally convex space {\displaystyle X,} a sequence {\displaystyle \left(x_{i}\right)_{i=1}^{\infty }} in {\displaystyle X} is absolutely convergent if {\displaystyle \sum _{i=1}^{\infty }p\left(x_{i}\right)<\infty } for every continuous seminorm {\displaystyle p} on {\displaystyle X.}[10] We write {\displaystyle x=\sum _{i=1}^{\infty }x_{i}} if the sequence of partial sums {\displaystyle \left(\sum _{i=1}^{n}x_{i}\right)_{n=1}^{\infty }} converges to {\displaystyle x} in {\displaystyle X.}[10]

The following fundamental result in the theory of topological tensor products is due to Alexander Grothendieck.[11]

TheoremLet {\displaystyle X} and {\displaystyle Y} be metrizable locally convex TVSs and let {\displaystyle z\in X{\widehat {\otimes }}_{\pi }Y.} Then {\displaystyle z} is the sum of an absolutely convergent series {\displaystyle z=\sum _{i=1}^{\infty }\lambda _{i}x_{i}\otimes y_{i}} where {\displaystyle \sum _{i=1}^{\infty }|\lambda _{i}|<\infty ,} and {\displaystyle \left(x_{i}\right)_{i=1}^{\infty }} and {\displaystyle \left(y_{i}\right)_{i=1}^{\infty }} are null sequences in {\displaystyle X} and {\displaystyle Y,} respectively.

The next theorem shows that it is possible to make the representation of {\displaystyle z} independent of the sequences {\displaystyle \left(x_{i}\right)_{i=1}^{\infty }} and {\displaystyle \left(y_{i}\right)_{i=1}^{\infty }.}

Theorem[12]Let {\displaystyle X} and {\displaystyle Y} be Fréchet spaces and let {\displaystyle U} (resp. {\displaystyle V}) be a balanced open neighborhood of the origin in {\displaystyle X} (resp. in {\displaystyle Y}). Let {\displaystyle K_{0}} be a compact subset of the convex balanced hull of {\displaystyle U\otimes V:=\{u\otimes v:u\in U,v\in V\}.} There exists a compact subset {\displaystyle K_{1}} of the unit ball in {\displaystyle \ell ^{1}} and sequences {\displaystyle \left(x_{i}\right)_{i=1}^{\infty }} and {\displaystyle \left(y_{i}\right)_{i=1}^{\infty }} contained in {\displaystyle U} and {\displaystyle V,} respectively, converging to the origin such that for every {\displaystyle z\in K_{0}} there exists some {\displaystyle \left(\lambda _{i}\right)_{i=1}^{\infty }\in K_{1}} such that {\displaystyle z=\sum _{i=1}^{\infty }\lambda _{i}x_{i}\otimes y_{i}.}

Topology of bi-bounded convergence

[edit]

Let {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {B}}_{X}} and {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {B}}_{Y}} denote the families of all bounded subsets of {\displaystyle X} and {\displaystyle Y,} respectively. Since the continuous dual space of {\displaystyle X{\widehat {\otimes }}_{\pi }Y} is the space of continuous bilinear forms {\displaystyle B(X,Y),} we can place on {\displaystyle B(X,Y)} the topology of uniform convergence on sets in {\displaystyle {\mathfrak {B}}_{X}\times {\mathfrak {B}}_{Y},} which is also called the topology of bi-bounded convergence. This topology is coarser than the strong topology on {\displaystyle B(X,Y)}, and in (Grothendieck 1955), Alexander Grothendieck was interested in when these two topologies were identical. This is equivalent to the problem: Given a bounded subset {\displaystyle B\subseteq X{\widehat {\otimes }}Y,} do there exist bounded subsets {\displaystyle B_{1}\subseteq X} and {\displaystyle B_{2}\subseteq Y} such that {\displaystyle B} is a subset of the closed convex hull of {\displaystyle B_{1}\otimes B_{2}:=\{b_{1}\otimes b_{2}:b_{1}\in B_{1},b_{2}\in B_{2}\}}?

Grothendieck proved that these topologies are equal when {\displaystyle X} and {\displaystyle Y} are both Banach spaces or both are DF-spaces (a class of spaces introduced by Grothendieck[13]). They are also equal when both spaces are Fréchet with one of them being nuclear.[9]

Strong dual and bidual

[edit]

Let {\displaystyle X} be a locally convex topological vector space and let {\displaystyle X^{\prime }} be its continuous dual space. Alexander Grothendieck characterized the strong dual and bidual for certain situations:

Theorem[14] (Grothendieck)Let {\displaystyle N} and {\displaystyle Y} be locally convex topological vector spaces with {\displaystyle N} nuclear. Assume that both {\displaystyle N} and {\displaystyle Y} are Fréchet spaces, or else that they are both DF-spaces. Then, denoting strong dual spaces with a subscripted {\displaystyle b}:

  1. The strong dual of {\displaystyle N{\widehat {\otimes }}_{\pi }Y} can be identified with {\displaystyle N_{b}^{\prime }{\widehat {\otimes }}_{\pi }Y_{b}^{\prime }};
  2. The bidual of {\displaystyle N{\widehat {\otimes }}_{\pi }Y} can be identified with {\displaystyle N{\widehat {\otimes }}_{\pi }Y^{\prime \prime }};
  3. If {\displaystyle Y} is reflexive then {\displaystyle N{\widehat {\otimes }}_{\pi }Y} (and hence {\displaystyle N_{b}^{\prime }{\widehat {\otimes }}_{\pi }Y_{b}^{\prime }}) is a reflexive space;
  4. Every separately continuous bilinear form on {\displaystyle N_{b}^{\prime }\times Y_{b}^{\prime }} is continuous;
  5. Let {\displaystyle L\left(X_{b}^{\prime },Y\right)} be the space of bounded linear maps from {\displaystyle X_{b}^{\prime }} to {\displaystyle Y}. Then, its strong dual can be identified with {\displaystyle N_{b}^{\prime }{\widehat {\otimes }}_{\pi }Y_{b}^{\prime },} so in particular if {\displaystyle Y} is reflexive then so is {\displaystyle L_{b}\left(X_{b}^{\prime },Y\right).}

Examples

[edit]
  • For {\displaystyle (X,{\mathcal {A}},\mu )} a measure space, let {\displaystyle L^{1}} be the real Lebesgue space {\displaystyle L^{1}(\mu )}; let {\displaystyle E} be a real Banach space. Let {\displaystyle L_{E}^{1}} be the completion of the space of simple functions {\displaystyle X\to E}, modulo the subspace of functions {\displaystyle X\to E} whose pointwise norms, considered as functions {\displaystyle X\to \mathbb {R} }, have integral {\displaystyle 0} with respect to {\displaystyle \mu }. Then {\displaystyle L_{E}^{1}} is isometrically isomorphic to {\displaystyle L^{1}{\widehat {\otimes }}_{\pi }E}.[15]

See also

[edit]

Citations

[edit]
  1. 1 2 Trèves 2006, p. 438.
  2. Trèves 2006, p. 435.
  3. 1 2 Trèves 2006, p. 437.
  4. Trèves 2006, p. 445.
  5. Trèves 2006, p. 439.
  6. 1 2 Ryan 2002, p. 18.
  7. Ryan 2002, p. 24.
  8. Ryan 2002, p. 43.
  9. 1 2 Schaefer & Wolff 1999, p. 173.
  10. 1 2 Schaefer & Wolff 1999, p. 120.
  11. Schaefer & Wolff 1999, p. 94.
  12. Trèves 2006, pp. 459–460.
  13. Schaefer & Wolff 1999, p. 154.
  14. Schaefer & Wolff 1999, pp. 175–176.
  15. Schaefer & Wolff 1999, p. 95.

References

[edit]
  • Ryan, Raymond (2002). Introduction to tensor products of Banach spaces. London New York: Springer. ISBN 1-85233-437-1. OCLC 48092184.
  • Schaefer, Helmut H.; Wolff, Manfred P. (1999). Topological Vector Spaces. GTM. Vol. 8 (Second ed.). New York, NY: Springer New York Imprint Springer. ISBN 978-1-4612-7155-0. OCLC 840278135.
  • Trèves, François (2006) [1967]. Topological Vector Spaces, Distributions and Kernels. Mineola, N.Y.: Dover Publications. ISBN 978-0-486-45352-1. OCLC 853623322.

Further reading

[edit]
  • Diestel, Joe (2008). The metric theory of tensor products : Grothendieck's résumé revisited. Providence, R.I: American Mathematical Society. ISBN 978-0-8218-4440-3. OCLC 185095773.
  • Grothendieck, Alexander (1955). "Produits Tensoriels Topologiques et Espaces Nucléaires" [Topological Tensor Products and Nuclear Spaces]. Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society Series (in French). 16. Providence: American Mathematical Society. MR 0075539. OCLC 9308061.
  • Grothendieck, Grothendieck (1966). Produits tensoriels topologiques et espaces nucléaires (in French). Providence: American Mathematical Society. ISBN 0-8218-1216-5. OCLC 1315788.
  • Pietsch, Albrecht (1972). Nuclear locally convex spaces. Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag. ISBN 0-387-05644-0. OCLC 539541.
  • Wong (1979). Schwartz spaces, nuclear spaces, and tensor products. Berlin New York: Springer-Verlag. ISBN 3-540-09513-6. OCLC 5126158.
[edit]
Projective tensor product
Morty Proxy This is a proxified and sanitized view of the page, visit original site.