Jump to content

Parallel external memory

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
PEM Model

In computer science, a parallel external memory (PEM) model is a cache-aware, external-memory abstract machine.[1] It is the parallel-computing analogy to the single-processor external memory (EM) model. In a similar way, it is the cache-aware analogy to the parallel random-access machine (PRAM). The PEM model consists of a number of processors, together with their respective private caches and a shared main memory.


Model

[edit]

Definition

[edit]

The PEM model[1] is a combination of the EM model and the PRAM model. The PEM model is a computation model which consists of {\displaystyle P} processors and a two-level memory hierarchy. This memory hierarchy consists of a large external memory (main memory) of size {\displaystyle N} and {\displaystyle P} small internal memories (caches). The processors share the main memory. Each cache is exclusive to a single processor. A processor can't access another’s cache. The caches have a size {\displaystyle M} which is partitioned in blocks of size {\displaystyle B}. The processors can only perform operations on data which are in their cache. The data can be transferred between the main memory and the cache in blocks of size {\displaystyle B}.

I/O complexity

[edit]

The complexity measure of the PEM model is the I/O complexity,[1] which determines the number of parallel blocks transfers between the main memory and the cache. During a parallel block transfer each processor can transfer a block. So if {\displaystyle P} processors load parallelly a data block of size {\displaystyle B} form the main memory into their caches, it is considered as an I/O complexity of {\displaystyle O(1)} not {\displaystyle O(P)}. A program in the PEM model should minimize the data transfer between main memory and caches and operate as much as possible on the data in the caches.

Read/write conflicts

[edit]

In the PEM model, there is no direct communication network between the P processors. The processors have to communicate indirectly over the main memory. If multiple processors try to access the same block in main memory concurrently read/write conflicts[1] occur. Like in the PRAM model, three different variations of this problem are considered:

  • Concurrent Read Concurrent Write (CRCW): The same block in main memory can be read and written by multiple processors concurrently.
  • Concurrent Read Exclusive Write (CREW): The same block in main memory can be read by multiple processors concurrently. Only one processor can write to a block at a time.
  • Exclusive Read Exclusive Write (EREW): The same block in main memory cannot be read or written by multiple processors concurrently. Only one processor can access a block at a time.

The following two algorithms[1] solve the CREW and EREW problem if {\displaystyle P\leq B} processors write to the same block simultaneously. A first approach is to serialize the write operations. Only one processor after the other writes to the block. This results in a total of {\displaystyle P} parallel block transfers. A second approach needs {\displaystyle O(\log(P))} parallel block transfers and an additional block for each processor. The main idea is to schedule the write operations in a binary tree fashion and gradually combine the data into a single block. In the first round {\displaystyle P} processors combine their blocks into {\displaystyle P/2} blocks. Then {\displaystyle P/2} processors combine the {\displaystyle P/2} blocks into {\displaystyle P/4}. This procedure is continued until all the data is combined in one block.

Comparison to other models

[edit]
Model Multi-core Cache-aware
Random-access machine (RAM) No No
Parallel random-access machine (PRAM) Yes No
External memory (EM) No Yes
Parallel external memory (PEM) Yes Yes

Examples

[edit]


Multiway partitioning

[edit]

Let {\displaystyle M=\{m_{1},...,m_{d-1}\}} be a vector of d-1 pivots sorted in increasing order. Let A be an unordered set of N elements. A d-way partition[1] of A is a set {\displaystyle \Pi =\{A_{1},...,A_{d}\}} , where {\displaystyle \cup _{i=1}^{d}A_{i}=A} and {\displaystyle A_{i}\cap A_{j}=\emptyset } for {\displaystyle 1\leq i<j\leq d}. {\displaystyle A_{i}} is called the i-th bucket. The number of elements in {\displaystyle A_{i}} is greater than {\displaystyle m_{i-1}} and smaller than {\displaystyle m_{i}^{2}}. In the following algorithm[1] the input is partitioned into N/P-sized contiguous segments {\displaystyle S_{1},...,S_{P}} in main memory. The processor i primarily works on the segment {\displaystyle S_{i}}. The multiway partitioning algorithm (PEM_DIST_SORT[1]) uses a PEM prefix sum algorithm[1] to calculate the prefix sum with the optimal {\displaystyle O\left({\frac {N}{PB}}+\log P\right)} I/O complexity. This algorithm simulates an optimal PRAM prefix sum algorithm.

// Compute parallelly a d-way partition on the data segments {\displaystyle S_{i}}
for each processor i in parallel do
    Read the vector of pivots M into the cache.
    Partition {\displaystyle S_{i}} into d buckets and let vector {\displaystyle M_{i}=\{j_{1}^{i},...,j_{d}^{i}\}} be the number of items in each bucket.
end for

Run PEM prefix sum on the set of vectors {\displaystyle \{M_{1},...,M_{P}\}} simultaneously.

// Use the prefix sum vector to compute the final partition
for each processor i in parallel do
    Write elements {\displaystyle S_{i}} into memory locations offset appropriately by {\displaystyle M_{i-1}} and {\displaystyle M_{i}}.
end for

Using the prefix sums stored in {\displaystyle M_{P}} the last processor P calculates the vector B of bucket sizes and returns it.

If the vector of {\displaystyle d=O\left({\frac {M}{B}}\right)} pivots M and the input set A are located in contiguous memory, then the d-way partitioning problem can be solved in the PEM model with {\displaystyle O\left({\frac {N}{PB}}+\left\lceil {\frac {d}{B}}\right\rceil >\log(P)+d\log(B)\right)} I/O complexity. The content of the final buckets have to be located in contiguous memory.

Selection

[edit]

The selection problem is about finding the k-th smallest item in an unordered list A of size N. The following code[1] makes use of PRAMSORT which is a PRAM optimal sorting algorithm which runs in {\displaystyle O(\log N)}, and SELECT, which is a cache optimal single-processor selection algorithm.

if {\displaystyle N\leq P} then 
    {\displaystyle {\texttt {PRAMSORT}}(A,P)}
    return {\displaystyle A[k]}
end if 

//Find median of each {\displaystyle S_{i}}
for each processor i in parallel do 
    {\displaystyle m_{i}={\texttt {SELECT}}(S_{i},{\frac {N}{2P}})}
end for 

// Sort medians
{\displaystyle {\texttt {PRAMSORT}}(\lbrace m_{1},\dots ,m_{2}\rbrace ,P)}

// Partition around median of medians
{\displaystyle t={\texttt {PEMPARTITION}}(A,m_{P/2},P)}

if {\displaystyle k\leq t} then 
    return {\displaystyle {\texttt {PEMSELECT}}(A[1:t],P,k)}
else 
    return {\displaystyle {\texttt {PEMSELECT}}(A[t+1:N],P,k-t)}
end if

Under the assumption that the input is stored in contiguous memory, PEMSELECT has an I/O complexity of:

{\displaystyle O\left({\frac {N}{PB}}+\log(PB)\cdot \log({\frac {N}{P}})\right)}

Distribution sort

[edit]

Distribution sort partitions an input list A of size N into d disjoint buckets of similar size. Every bucket is then sorted recursively and the results are combined into a fully sorted list.

If {\displaystyle P=1} the task is delegated to a cache-optimal single-processor sorting algorithm.

Otherwise the following algorithm[1] is used:

// Sample {\displaystyle {\tfrac {4N}{\sqrt {d}}}} elements from A
for each processor i in parallel do
    if {\displaystyle M<|S_{i}|} then
        {\displaystyle d=M/B}
        Load {\displaystyle S_{i}} in M-sized pages and sort pages individually
    else
        {\displaystyle d=|S_{i}|}
        Load and sort {\displaystyle S_{i}} as single page
    end if
    Pick every {\displaystyle {\sqrt {d}}/4}'th element from each sorted memory page into contiguous vector {\displaystyle R^{i}} of samples
end for 

in parallel do
    Combine vectors {\displaystyle R^{1}\dots R^{P}} into a single contiguous vector {\displaystyle {\mathcal {R}}}
    Make {\displaystyle {\sqrt {d}}} copies of {\displaystyle {\mathcal {R}}}: {\displaystyle {\mathcal {R}}_{1}\dots {\mathcal {R}}_{\sqrt {d}}}
end do

// Find {\displaystyle {\sqrt {d}}} pivots {\displaystyle {\mathcal {M}}[j]}
for {\displaystyle j=1} to {\displaystyle {\sqrt {d}}} in parallel do
    {\displaystyle {\mathcal {M}}[j]={\texttt {PEMSELECT}}({\mathcal {R}}_{i},{\tfrac {P}{\sqrt {d}}},{\tfrac {j\cdot 4N}{d}})}
end for

Pack pivots in contiguous array {\displaystyle {\mathcal {M}}}

// Partition Aaround pivots into buckets {\displaystyle {\mathcal {B}}}
{\displaystyle {\mathcal {B}}={\texttt {PEMMULTIPARTITION}}(A[1:N],{\mathcal {M}},{\sqrt {d}},P)}

// Recursively sort buckets
for {\displaystyle j=1} to {\displaystyle {\sqrt {d}}+1} in parallel do
    recursively call {\displaystyle {\texttt {PEMDISTSORT}}} on bucket jof size {\displaystyle {\mathcal {B}}[j]}
    using {\displaystyle O\left(\left\lceil {\tfrac {{\mathcal {B}}[j]}{N/P}}\right\rceil \right)} processors responsible for elements in bucket j
end for

The I/O complexity of PEMDISTSORT is:

{\displaystyle O\left(\left\lceil {\frac {N}{PB}}\right\rceil \left(\log _{d}P+\log _{M/B}{\frac {N}{PB}}\right)+f(N,P,d)\cdot \log _{d}P\right)}

where

{\displaystyle f(N,P,d)=O\left(\log {\frac {PB}{\sqrt {d}}}\log {\frac {N}{P}}+\left\lceil {\frac {\sqrt {d}}{B}}\log P+{\sqrt {d}}\log B\right\rceil \right)}

If the number of processors is chosen that {\displaystyle f(N,P,d)=O\left(\left\lceil {\tfrac {N}{PB}}\right\rceil \right)}and {\displaystyle M<B^{O(1)}} the I/O complexity is then:

{\displaystyle O\left({\frac {N}{PB}}\log _{M/B}{\frac {N}{B}}\right)}

Other PEM algorithms

[edit]
PEM Algorithm I/O complexity Constraints
Mergesort[1] {\displaystyle O\left({\frac {N}{PB}}\log _{\frac {M}{B}}{\frac {N}{B}}\right)={\textrm {sort}}_{P}(N)} {\displaystyle P\leq {\frac {N}{B^{2}}},M=B^{O(1)}}
List ranking[2] {\displaystyle O\left({\textrm {sort}}_{P}(N)\right)} {\displaystyle P\leq {\frac {N/B^{2}}{\log B\cdot \log ^{O(1)}N}},M=B^{O(1)}}
Euler tour[2] {\displaystyle O\left({\textrm {sort}}_{P}(N)\right)} {\displaystyle P\leq {\frac {N}{B^{2}}},M=B^{O(1)}}
Expression tree evaluation[2] {\displaystyle O\left({\textrm {sort}}_{P}(N)\right)} {\displaystyle P\leq {\frac {N}{B^{2}\log B\cdot \log ^{O(1)}N}},M=B^{O(1)}}
Finding a MST[2] {\displaystyle O\left({\textrm {sort}}_{P}(|V|)+{\textrm {sort}}_{P}(|E|)\log {\tfrac {|V|}{pB}}\right)} {\displaystyle p\leq {\frac {|V|+|E|}{B^{2}\log B\cdot \log ^{O(1)}N}},M=B^{O(1)}}

Where {\displaystyle {\textrm {sort}}_{P}(N)} is the time it takes to sort N items with P processors in the PEM model.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Arge, Lars; Goodrich, Michael T.; Nelson, Michael; Sitchinava, Nodari (2008). "Fundamental parallel algorithms for private-cache chip multiprocessors". Proceedings of the twentieth annual symposium on Parallelism in algorithms and architectures. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press. pp. 197–206. doi:10.1145/1378533.1378573. ISBN 9781595939739. S2CID 11067041.
  2. 1 2 3 4 Arge, Lars; Goodrich, Michael T.; Sitchinava, Nodari (2010). "Parallel external memory graph algorithms". 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Parallel & Distributed Processing (IPDPS). IEEE. pp. 1–11. doi:10.1109/ipdps.2010.5470440. ISBN 9781424464425. S2CID 587572.
Parallel external memory
Morty Proxy This is a proxified and sanitized view of the page, visit original site.