Talk:Chess Opening Theory/1. e4/1...e5/2. Nf3/2...Nc6/3. c3
Add topic
|
This module is within the scope of Wikibooks:Chess, a collaborative effort to improve Wikibooks' coverage of chess. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
small mistake in theory table... number should start at 4 not 3 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.167.222.249 (discuss) 05:10, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Non-encyclopedic content
[edit source]I removed this content which was written in first person and contains references that will date themselves:
This is what many say who do not know the latest theory of this opening. Actually it is a good opening and it is difficult for Black to equalize. I have won from many experts and masters with this opening because they underestimate what a skilled Ponziani player can do. There is a fairly new book that brings the theory of this opening up to date. It is Play the Ponziani by Keith Hayward and David Taylor. The moves and evaluations given here in the theory table are quite incorrect. [I am David Taylor]
...
While these are two excellent books I have found follow ups for White where the refutations fail and White keeps the normal opening advantage. --Atkinson 291 (discuss • contribs) 20:39, 21 September 2014 (UTC)