IntechOpen

Home > Books > Abiotic Stress in Plants - Adaptations to Climate Change

Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Role of Plant Hormones in Mitigating Abiotic Stress

Written By

Nazima Rasool

Submitted: 27 November 2022 Reviewed: 12 January 2023 Published: 20 February 2023

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.109983

Abiotic Stress in Plants
Abiotic Stress in Plants Adaptations to Climate Change Edited by Manuel Oliveira and Anabela A. Fernandes Silva

From the Edited Volume

Abiotic Stress in Plants - Adaptations to Climate Change

Edited by Manuel Oliveira and Anabela Fernandes-Silva

Book Details Order Print

Chapter metrics overview

321 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics
Advertisement

Abstract

Agricultural productivity world over is threatened by abiotic stress, intensifying food security issues. The plant hormones play a significant role in mitigating abiotic stresses, including drought stress, salinity stress, heat stress, and heavy metal stress, faced by the plants. Considerable research has been conducted to understand hormone-mediated abiotic stress responses in plants and the underlying biosynthetic and regulatory pathways. Deciphering these pathways would allow their manipulation in the laboratory and possible extension to the field. In the present chapter, an overview of the role plant hormones play in mitigating abiotic stress, the underlying mechanisms of their action, and the cross-talk between their signaling pathways to mitigate abiotic stress is presented.

Keywords

  • abiotic stress
  • plant hormones
  • stress response
  • stress mitigation
  • plant productivity

1. Introduction

Plant hormones or phytohormones are biochemicals required for the normal growth and development of plants [1, 2, 3]. Plant hormones include auxins (IAA), gibberellins (GAs) cytokinins (CK), abscisic acid (ABA), ethylene (ET), besides jasmonates (JA), salicylic acid (SA), brassinosteroids (BR), strigolactones (SL), and nitric oxide (NO). Apart from their role in plant growth and development, hormones also mediate response to biotic (disease, pathogens, herbivores, etc.) and abiotic (drought, heat, salinity, heavy metals, etc.) stress [3, 4, 5, 6]. Hormones act at the site of their biosynthesis or some distance away from it [3, 6, 7, 8]. Hormone biosynthesis, distribution, and patterns of their signal transduction change under stress conditions [8, 9]. Ethylene and ABA play remarkable roles in regulating the abiotic stress response [8]. The exogenous supply of phytohormones also increases stress endurance in plants [10, 11]. Abiotic stress factors rarely occur individually, and many stresses produce the same effects at the cellular level with an overlap in the expression pattern of stress response genes [12]. In the current chapter, the hormone-mediated response of plants to the abiotic stress, including drought, heat, and salinity, is discussed.

1.1 What is abiotic stress?

Ecological factors favor plant growth at optimum levels and constitute stress at sub- or supra-optimal levels. Abiotic stress reduces crop productivity by about 50% (Table 1) [8, 29]. High temperatures lead to 20% decrease in the yield, low temperatures 7%, salinity 10%, drought 9% and other forms of stress cause 4% yield loss [30]. In grain crops, grain size, number, and dry weight are influenced by abiotic stress, especially if present during the reproductive phase [30]. Various aspects of plant growth as affected by abiotic stress are presented in Figure 1. Crop productivity may be reduced by 2.5–16% by a 1°C rise in seasonal temperature in tropical and subtropical regions [31]. The stress response depends on the genetic constitution and adaptive response of a plant [32].

CropAbiotic stress factorLoss in productivityReferences
WheatDrought27.5%Zhang et al., [13]
Temperature29–44%Djanaguiraman et al., [14]
Salinity45%Ali et al., [15]
RiceDrought25.4%Zhang et al., [13]
Temperature3.2%*Zhao et al., [16]
Salinity30–50%Eynard et al., [17]
MaizeDrought5–15%Campos et al., [18]
Temperature7.4%*Zhao et al., [16]
Salinity34%Cucci et al., [19]
ChickpeaDrought45–69%Nayyar et al., [20]
Temperature39%Devasirvatham et al., [21]
Salinity8–10%Zawude and Shanko, [22]
SoybeanDrought46–71%Samarah et al., [23]
Temperature42–64%Jumrani & Bhatia, [24]
Salinity66–86%Bustingorri & Lavado [25]
SunflowerDrought50%Hussain et al., [26]
Temperature*6%Rondanini et al., [27]
Salinity50%El-Kader et al., [28]

Table 1.

Loss of productivity in the major staple crops due to abiotic stress.

Estimates for 1°C rise in temperature.


Figure 1.

Schematic presentation of impact of abiotic stress on growth & development of plants.

1.2 Drought

Drought has been defined as “a period of abnormally dry weather sufficiently prolonged for the lack of water to cause a serious hydrologic imbalance in the affected area” [33]. Drought is one of the dominant factors diminishing crop productivity [34, 35]. Drought has been called as “one of the world’s extreme weather-related natural hazards” [35, 36]. It threatens the sustainability of agricultural systems around the world [37]. From 1994 to 2013, it represented 5% of all natural disasters and affected one billion people [35, 38]. All aspects of plant growth, including photosynthesis, protein synthesis, water relations, cell turgidity, membrane integrity, and nutrient uptake, are affected by drought [8, 39, 40]. It causes oxidative stress and damages the biological molecules, including DNA, proteins, and photosynthetic pigments. [8, 35, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45]. Plants synthesize a whole range of molecules as protection against drought stress, for example, proline, glycine betaine, soluble sugars (mannitol, sorbitol, and trehalose), polyamines, and proteins [37, 46].

ABA levels increase in plants under drought stress [47, 48], inducing the expression of ABA-dependent genes [6, 49]. ABA signaling leads to the closure of stomata, reducing transpiration [48]. Expression levels of ZEP (Zeaxanthin Epoxidase) gene, AAO3 (Arabidopsis Aldehyde Oxidase) gene, NCED3 (Nine-Cis-Epoxycarotenoid Dioxygenase) gene, and the MCSU (Molybdenum Cofactor Sulfurase) Gene are increased upon osmotic stress [50]. Overexpression of NCED3 improves water use efficiency and its mutation causes drought susceptibility [49, 51, 52]. ABA is transported into the guard cells through passive diffusion via members of ABC (ABCG25 and ABCG40) and nitrate (AIT1/NRT1.2 and NPF4.6) transporter families. ABCG25 is an ABA exporter with tissue-specific expression induced by ABA and drought stress [49, 53]. ABCG40, AIT1/NRT1.2, and NPF4.6 import ABA into the guard cells. ABA also generates ROS, which leads to increased cytosolic Ca2+ levels and stomatal closure [54, 55, 56].

About 14 ABA receptor proteins mediate ABA signaling. Pyrabactin Resistance 1 (PYR1) and PYR1-like (PYL) regulatory elements undergo a conformational change after ABA binding and inactivate the clade A Serine/Threonine Protein Phosphatase 2C (PP2C) [48, 57, 58]. This in turn triggers the ABA signaling cascade by phosphorylation of serine/threonine kinases [48, 59]. Transcription of ABA-responsive genes is upregulated by binding of ABRE (ABA-Responsive Elements) to the ABRE-Binding Proteins (AREBs) or ABRE-Binding Factors (ABFs) [48, 60]. ABFs are activated by their ABA-mediated phosphorylation [48, 61]. AREB1/ABF2, AREB2/ABF4, and ABF3 are induced by abiotic stress, including dehydration and high salinity [48]. Transcription factors belonging to MYC, MYB, and NAC protein families are also known to work in an ABA-dependent manner [48, 62, 63]. Stress response improves in plants overexpressing RD26 (Responsive to Desiccation 26), a stress-inducible NAC transcription factor [48, 63]. Dehydration-Responsive Element (DRE)-Binding Protein (DREB) transcription factors are regulated by ABA-dependent pathways under osmotic stress [48, 64]. The binding of AREB1, AREB2, and ABF3 to the DREB2A promoter results in the activation of DREB2A in an ABA-dependent manner [48, 65].

In Arabidopsis thaliana, many genes involved in ABA biosynthesis and signaling have been characterized [6, 66]. When A. thaliana is exposed to drought or salt stress, expression of the ABA3/LOS5 gene increases considerably [67]. Constitutive or drought-induced expression of this gene has been reported to increase rice yield [6, 68]. AtNCED3 plays an important role in drought tolerance [6]. Higher expression of SgNCED1 in transgenic tobacco plants with this gene from Stylosanthes guianensis had improved drought and salinity tolerance and higher (51–77%) ABA content [6, 69]. In tomato plants, overexpression of LeNCED1 constitutively resulted in the accumulation of ABA [6, 70]. Drought-inducible rd29A promoter-driven gene construct in Brassica napus increased yield under mild drought conditions [6, 71]. The wild form of this gene codes for the b-subunit of farnesyltransferase, which is involved in ABA-dependent signal transduction [72]. Exogenous application of ABA enhances the activities of GT, CAT, APX, and SOD [31, 37]. ABA priming increases the relative water content in drought-stressed wheat cultivars [73].

ABA is negatively regulated by cytokinin receptor HKs, AHK2 (Arabidopsis histidine kinase 2), AHK3, and AHK4 mutations in these genes increase drought tolerance [49, 74, 75]. CK, being an ABA antagonist, is decreased in conditions of drought stress; however, CK has also been reported to increase proline levels, inhibit senescence, and promote survival under drought conditions [6, 76]. Exogenously applied 6-benzylaminopurine increased the photosynthetic rate and stimulated protective enzymes in the maize seedlings [77]. BRs increase drought tolerance in many plants when applied exogenously [6, 78]. However, some reports also suggest that endogenous BRs or their perception are not involved in the water stress response [6, 79]. Auxins regulate ABA [37, 80]; Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA)-amido synthetase encoding gene TLD1/OsGH3.13 increases expression of LEA (Late Embryogenesis Abundant) genes increasing drought tolerance in rice seedlings [6, 81]. Several studies indicate mitigating effects of SA on drought, salinity, and high-temperature stress [82, 83]. SA has been reported to increase catalase activity in wheat under drought stress [37, 84]. In Portulaca oleracea, SA improved photosynthetic pigments, secondary metabolites, and gas exchange [37, 85]. SA application increased water use efficiency, photosynthesis, and activity of antioxidant enzymes and also prevented cell damage under drought [86]. Ethylene activates DREB transcription factors [87]. Under mild drought stress shoot dry weight of six cultivars of wheat ranging from sensitive to tolerant was higher in the tolerant ones, which was related to higher ethylene content [37, 88]. Etol1 mutants of rice that accumulate more ethylene than OsETOL1 tolerate drought better.

1.3 Temperature

Temperature affects the distribution, phenology, and physiology of plants [89]. Temperature is increasing under dry as well as wet conditions in the changing global climate scenario [89, 90]. For 2081 – 2100, the IPCC has predicted average temperatures higher by 1.0°C to 1.8°C under very low, 2.1°C to 3.5°C under intermediate and 3.3°C to 5.7°C under very high GHG emission scenarios in comparison to 1850-1900 [91]. The crop productivity decreases by 6% for one degree rise in temperature beyond the optimum [8, 92]. Temperature stress causes accumulation of ROS, denaturation, misfolding, and aggregation of proteins, changes the membrane structure affecting permeability and raft distribution, besides its impact on leaf area, leaf retention, stomatal conductance, water potential, rate of transpiration, etc. [89, 90, 91, 93]. Photosynthetic capacity may be diminished or permanently damaged due to heat stress [91, 94].

Plants produce transcription factors, heat signaling proteins, and molecular chaperones to prevent protein misfolding and aggregation after heat shock (HS) [95, 96]. In response to HS, the endogenous ABA levels increase transiently increasing the antioxidant capacity [47, 97, 98], for example, by inducing RBOH-NADPH oxidases. Out of 10 different RBOH genes identified in Arabidopsis, only AtRBOHD is upregulated in response to heat stress [91, 99]. The mutants for this gene show low germination and seedling survival at higher temperatures [91, 97, 100]. ABA biosynthesis inhibitors and ABA signaling mutants have impaired heat stress tolerance [91, 97]. Both the heat shock proteins and their transcription factors are regulated by ABA. Expression levels of ABA1/ZEP and NCED2/5/9 increase in Arabidopsis at 32°C increasing the ABA levels. Cucumbers and red-skinned grapes show higher ABA levels at 35°C [98, 101]. Drought priming in Festuca arundinacea and Arabidopsis increases their heat tolerance. Arabidopsis ABA biosynthesis mutants or plants treated with ABA biosynthesis inhibitors lack the drought priming effect [91, 102]. ABA treatment increases the expression of tall fescue heat stress transcription factor A2c (FaHSFA2c). ABA may also modulate carbohydrate and energy status to strengthen the heat stress response [103].

Auxins play an important role in thermomorphogenesis [91, 98, 104]. Auxin biosynthesis genes TAA1, CYP79B2, and YUCCA8 are upregulated at higher temperatures; thermomorphogenesis response is abolished in shy2–2 (short hypocotyl) mutation affecting the auxin-responsive IAA3 gene [98, 105, 106]. Auxin-mediated thermomorphogenesis is regulated through phytochrome interacting factors (PIFs) and bHLH transcriptional regulators. PIFs also upregulate auxin biosynthesis; HDA9 (histone deacetylase 9), a chromatin-modifying enzyme, facilitates the binding of PIF4 to the promoter of YUCCA8 [91, 98, 106, 107]. pif4 mutants have very low levels of enzymes of the YUCCA family, aminotransferase, and cytochrome P450s, which are involved in the heat stress response [91, 105, 106]. In pif4 plants, ectopic expression of PIF4 under an epidermis-specific promoter restores hypocotyl elongation induced by heat stress [91, 98, 108]. PIF4 and PIF7 loss of function mutants lose their heat stress-induced thermomorphogenesis. Thermomorphogenesis also requires HSP90. Thermomorphogenesis also involves brassinosteroids through phyB-PIF4 [98, 109, 110]; the temperature-sensitivity of hypocotyl elongation is inhibited by the application of PPZ (propiconazole), a BR biosynthesis inhibitor [109, 111].

BRs increase the production of HSPs [91, 112] and regulate the heat-induced accumulation of proton–pumping ATPase and aquaporins [91, 113], besides inducing the expression and activity of ROS scavenging enzymes under heat stress [91, 114]. In tomatoes, BR treatment increases the expression of RBOH1 and apoplast H2O2 levels [115]. Interestingly, H2O2 activates MPK2, which in turn enhances RBOH1 expression [91, 116]. Heat stress causes the accumulation of BZR1 (Brassinazole-resistant 1), an important transcription factor in BR signaling, in the nucleus [110].

Ethylene is another hormone involved in heat stress tolerance. EIN2 and ER1 mutants have poor survival rates under heat stress [95, 97]. Arabidopsis plants overexpressing ERF1 are more tolerant to heat stress than the control plants; ERF-1 overexpressing plants have higher transcript levels of HsfA3 and HSP70. Studies have indicated increased synthesis of ET under heat stress [98, 117]. However, in Arabidopsis, ein2–1 mutants exhibit greater tolerance to heat stress [91, 118]. ET is involved in CO2-induced heat stress responses in tomatoes [11] and increased thermotolerance in rice [91, 95].

CKs play an important role in heat stress responses in plants [91, 119, 120]. They increase the activities of APX, SOD, and GP and also upregulate genes responsible for photosynthesis and carbohydrate metabolism under heat stress [91, 121]. CK oxidase/dehydrogenase inhibitors improve heat stress tolerance [91, 122]. Heat stress tolerance is also increased in plants with ectopic expression of isopentenyl transferase (ipt) from Agrobacterium tumefaciens [91, 123]. In Arabidopsis, rice, and passion fruit, external CK application decreased the negative effects of heat stress [124, 125].

In Medicago sativa, plant height, photosynthetic efficiency, and plant biomass were improved by pre-treatment with SA [126]. SA promotes the activities of CAT, SOD, and POX, which improve photosynthetic efficiency, ROS scavenging, and HSP21 levels [83, 95]. Under heat stress, it protects photosystem II and maintains high Rubisco activity [95, 127]. SA application in tomatoes under heat stress decreased oxidative damage and significantly improved gas exchange, proline content, and water use efficiency [83]. ET and JA accumulate in Arabidopsis after heat stress [97]. Plants with constitutive expression of PR1 (cpr5–1) have higher heat stress tolerance [95, 118]. Exogenous JA application reduced the negative effects of heat stress [95, 118]. External application of strigolactone to SL biosynthesis mutants restores seed thermo-inhibition [98, 128].

GA biosynthesis and accumulation increase under elevated temperatures in Carrizo citrange seedlings, wheat, and soybean hypocotyl [98, 129]. PIF4 upregulates the GA20ox1 gene [130]. PIF4 transcription factors Class I TCP14 and TCP15 (Teosinte Branched 1, Cycloidea, and PCF) play an important role during this process; TCP14 and TCP15 mutants have reduced temperature sensitivity [130]. Seeds at 32°C have lower expression of GA20ox1, GA20ox2, GA20ox3, GA3ox1, and GA3ox2 in comparison to those kept at 28–29°C [98, 131].

SA biosynthesis is suppressed at higher temperatures in tobacco after TMV infection and in Arabidopsis after Pst 350 DC3000 infection [132]. High temperatures suppress the expression of Isochorismate Synthase 1 (ICS1), and ics1do not show temperature sensitivity to infection [132]. JA biosynthesis genes are upregulated by moderately higher (29–30°C) temperatures after wounding or Pst DC3000 infection in Arabidopsis [132, 133]. High temperatures have a tissue-specific effect on JA systemic transport in plants [122].

1.4 Salinity

Soils with electric conductivity higher than 4 dS/m at 25°C are classified as saline [134]. Salinity has affected more than 800 million hectares of land globally, decreasing potential agricultural land by 1–2% per year [8, 135]. More than 50% of the land in developing countries, particularly that falling in the arid region, is affected by salinity, causing yield losses to the tune of 40%, for example, in the case of wheat [8, 136]. It decreases the quantity as well as the quality of the produce [8, 137]. Salinity impairs water uptake and causes ion toxicity, osmotic stress, nutrient deficiency, and oxidative stress [138]. Salt stress causes physiological drought impairing protein and photosynthesis [8, 137]. Changes in the intracellular Ca2+ levels, excess Na+, and ROS accumulation are the signals that trigger the salt stress response [139].

Ethylene is the major hormone in the salt stress response [138]. The levels of ET as well as its precursor ACC (1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate) increase under salt stress [138, 140]. While salt tolerance can be increased by the application of ET or its precursor ACC [141, 142], inhibition of ET synthesis or signaling may increase salt sensitivity [138]. Ethylene signaling involves five ethylene receptors [ETR1 (Ethylene Response 1), ERS1 (Ethylene Response Sensor 1), ETR2, EIN4 (Ethylene Insensitive 4), and ERS2], a protein kinase, CTR1 (Constitutive Triple Response 1—a negative regulator) and a key positive regulator EIN2, which signals primary transcription factors EIN3, EIL1 (Ethylene Insensitive Like 1) and EIL2 and many downstream ethylene response factors. Osmotic stress, induced by many abiotic stresses, including salinity, suppresses the expression of ETR1 [138, 143]. During short- and long-term salt stress, ethylene receptor genes (ETR1, ETR2, and EIN4), signaling genes (CTR1, EIN3, ERF1, and ERF2), and MAPK cascade genes (MEKK1-MKK2-MPK4/6), are upregulated in cotton [144]. Many ERF (Ethylene-Responsive Element Binding Factor) genes ESE1–ESE3 are induced by ethylene and salt stress. Accumulation and transcriptional activity of EIN3 and EBF1/EBF2 degradation are promoted under salt stress [144]. The levels of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid synthases (ACSs) increase significantly under salinity stress [138, 144, 145]. ACC pretreatment increases salt stress tolerance in Arabidopsis seedlings [138, 141, 142, 146]. Salinity induces ACS1 transcription in tobacco [138, 147]. Salt stress given to salt-acclimated and non-acclimated plants upregulated four ACSs [138, 148]. In the post-transcriptional regulation of ACSs, stress-induced MAPK cascades phosphorylate CSs, preventing their 26S proteasome-mediated degradation [138, 149]. The effect of salt acclimation is diminished by the loss of function of MAPK6 [148]. Stabilization of ACSs apparently needs MPK6 to maintain high ethylene levels [138, 148]. ACSs are also stabilized by CDPKs (Calcium-Dependent Protein Kinases) in tomatoes [138]. ACC content and activity of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid oxidase (ACO) is increased under salt stress in Cicer arietinum roots [138].

200 mM NaCl induces the expression of ETOL1 in rice [138, 150]. ETO1’s loss of function promotes ethylene production in Arabidopsis. Root-to-shoot delivery of Na+ is restricted in the absence of ETO1, which also increases RBOHF-dependent ROS accumulation in root stele tissue. Loss of ETO1 also increases K+ levels by increasing K+-transporter HAK5 transcripts [138]. Arabidopsis etr1 loss-of-function mutants have increased salt tolerance [141, 142, 151]. ET sensitivity decreases and salt sensitivity increases in tobacco and Arabidopsis on overexpression of NTHK1 [138, 147]. Loss of function of CTR1 increases salinity tolerance [142, 145]. Arabidopsis loss-of-function EIN2 mutants are salt sensitive; overexpression of the C-terminus of EIN2 in ein2–5 mutants decreases salt sensitivity [138, 141, 142  152]. ein3eil1 double mutants of Arabidopsis are highly sensitive to salinity. Also, ein3–1 mutants are highly salt-sensitive whereas plants overexpressing EIN3 are salt tolerant [138, 142, 145, 152].

An array of stress-responsive genes is regulated by ABA [153]. ABA coordinates with ET in mediating salt stress. On exposure to salt, many genes involved in ABA biosynthesis, including ZEP, AAO, and MCSU, are stimulated through Ca2+ −dependent phosphorylation events and their downstream signaling pathways [153, 154]. Increased ABA levels have been reported in many plants, including Oryza sativa [155], Brassica [156], Phaseolus vulgaris [157], and Zea mays [158]. Higher ABA levels help accumulate proteins for osmotic adjustment and also cause stomatal closure. High accumulation of ABA due to ectopic expression of drought-responsive GenesOsDSM2 (Drought-Hypersensitive Mutant 2) and OsCam1–1 (Oryza Sativa Calmodulin1–1) in rice increases salt stress tolerance [153]. Salt stress as well as ABA treatment upregulates several MAPKs [153], and plants with higher expression levels of MAPKs have higher salt stress tolerance [153, 159]. ABA-regulated Ca2+-dependent kinases and SnRks phosphorylate ABA-related transcription factors, affect gene expression, and modulate salt stress [12, 153, 159]. Promoters of stress-responsive genes contain many regulatory sequences (DRE/CRT, ABRE, MYC recognition sequence (MYCRS), and MYB recognition sequence (MYBRS)). Activation of salt stress-responsive genes is stimulated by ABA-dependent transcription factors ABFs, MYCs, and MYBs, which directly bind to these sequences on the promoters [153]. Promoters of all LEA genes have ABRE motifs that bind ABF [153]. ABFs and DREB2 regulate the drought-inducible Dihydroorotate Dehydrogenase1 gene, which is important in salt and drought stress responses [153]. Since ABA and ET enter into crosstalk during the stress response, tolerance to salt, osmotic, and heat stresses is alleviated by a mutation in ACS7 [138].

The information available on the mechanism of salt stress response via auxins is scarce [153]. YUCCA3, a gene involved in auxin biosynthesis, causes hypersensitivity to salt stress, leading to increased auxin production [160]. Auxin accumulation and redistribution in response to salt stress change the root architecture [161]. Salt stress in tomatoes decreases auxin levels by 75% [162]. The reduced growth under salt stress is a manifestation of altered levels of IAA biosynthesis and its distribution [8]. The salinity stress in wheat decreases CKs biosynthesis [8]. In Arabidopsis, wild-type plants were not as tolerant to salt stress as CK-deficient mutants [75]. Mutants with decreased CK levels had higher expression of the HKT1–1 gene, which encodes a Na+ transporter [75]. Salt tolerance was reduced in Arabidopsis plants overexpressing IPT8 genes [163]. However, the positive role of CK in salinity stress has also been reported. Applying cytokinin oxidase inhibitor (INCYDE) to salt-stressed tomato plants improved flower production and photosynthesis [164].

Advertisement

2. Conclusions

Plant hormones play an important role in the growth and development of plants and also represent an important line of defense against abiotic stress. Hormones change the pattern of growth to enable the plants to withstand stress. The plant stress response involves many hormones, their downstream response factors, associated gene networks, and transcription factors. The crosstalk between hormones and their synergistic or antagonistic interactions play central role in phytohormone-mediated abiotic stress tolerance [165]. Understanding the molecular level interaction between elements of different pathways controlling stress response is critical to allow their manipulation to improve stress tolerance. This is important, as the diversity, duration, and intensity of abiotic stresses are increasing in the changing global climate scenario. Plant hormones are an important target for better management of abiotic stress, especially, in view of the limited success of conventional breeding techniques in dealing with it. Phytohormone pathways and the intermediaries therein can go a long way in the production of climate-resilient crops.

New technologies to bioengineer plants have proven useful in achieving this end; examples include soybean [166], maize [167], rice [168], and potato [169]. Techniques including transcriptome analysis, next-generation sequencing analysis, transgenic plants, genome editing, etc. are being used to identify the hormone-mediated regulatory mechanisms of the plant stress response. Transcriptome analysis using microarrays, a survey of transcriptome profiles, and levels of microRNAs in plants under stress using RNA-seq have helped understand the mechanism of stress tolerance in plants [170]. With genome editing technology, genomes can now be modified in a site-specific manner using specifically designed endonucleases like zinc finger nucleases (ZFN) or TAL effector nucleases (TALEN; [49, 171]) and the CRISPR/CAS system [49, 172].

In a nutshell, new pathways are already emerging. However, the complex interactions between the hormones and their ability to regulate a wide array of plant developmental and physiological processes complicate teasing out the effect of an individual hormone. Lack of information about the tissue-specific stress response and genetic plasticity as well as the extreme complexity of thresholds for different stress responses makes mechanistic understanding of abiotic stress tolerance difficult [173]. In order to better understand the hormone mediated abiotic stress response, the future research should focus on identifying the antagonistic and synergistic interactions between various hormones and the critical regulatory junctures in the hormone crosstalk.

References

  1. 1. Jiang K, Asami T. Chemical regulators of plant hormones and their applications in basic research and agriculture. Bioscience, biotechnology, biochemistry. 2018;82(8):1265-1300
  2. 2. Wani SH, Kumar V, Shriram V, Sah SK. Phytohormones and their metabolic engineering for abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. The Crop Journal. 2016;4(3):162-176
  3. 3. Rasool N. Plant hormones: Role in alleviating biotic stress. Plant Hormones: Recent Advances, New Perspectives and Applications. 2022;25:17
  4. 4. Ku YS, Sintaha M, Cheung MY, Lam HM. Plant hormone signaling crosstalks between biotic and abiotic stress responses. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2018;19(10):3206
  5. 5. Rhaman MS, Imran S, Rauf F, Khatun M, et al. Seed priming with phytohormones: An effective approach for the mitigation of abiotic stress. Plants. 2020;10(1):37
  6. 6. Peleg Z, Blumwald E. Hormone balance and abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Current opinion in plant biology. 2011;14(3):290-295
  7. 7. Chantre Nongpiur R, Lata Singla-Pareek S, Pareek A. Genomics approaches for improving salinity stress tolerance in crop plants. Current Genomics. 2016;17(4):343-357
  8. 8. Talaat NB. Abiotic stresses-induced physiological alteration in wheat. In: Wheat Production in Changing Environments. Singapore: Springer; 2019. pp. 1-30
  9. 9. Eyidogan F, Oz MT, Yucel M, Oktem HA. Signal transduction of phytohormones under abiotic stresses. In: Phytohormones and Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Plants. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2012. pp. 1-48
  10. 10. Nguyen TQ , Sesin V, Kisiala A, Emery RN. Phytohormonal roles in plant responses to heavy metal stress: Implications for using macrophytes in phytoremediation of aquatic ecosystems. Environment Toxicology Chemistry. 2021;40(1):7-22
  11. 11. Sytar O, Kumari P, Yadav S, Brestic M, Rastogi A. Phytohormone priming: Regulator for heavy metal stress in plants. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation. 2019;38(2):739-752
  12. 12. Tuteja N. Mechanisms of high salinity tolerance in plants. Methods in Enzymology. 2007;428:419-438
  13. 13. Zhang J, Zhang S, Cheng M, Jiang H, et al. Effect of drought on agronomic traits of rice and wheat: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Environemt Research Public Health. 2018;15(5):839
  14. 14. Djanaguiraman M, Narayanan S, Erdayani E, Prasad PV. Effects of high temperature stress during anthesis and grain filling periods on photosynthesis, lipids and grain yield in wheat. BMC Plant Biology. 2020;20(1):1-2
  15. 15. Ali A, Basra SM, Ahmad R, Wahid A. Optimizing silicon application to improve salinity tolerance in wheat. Soil Environment. 2009;28(2):136-144
  16. 16. Zhao C, Liu B, Piao S, et al. Temperature increase reduces global yields of major crops in four independent estimates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2017;114(35):9326-9331
  17. 17. Eynard A, Lal R, Wiebe K. Crop response in salt-affected soils. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture. 2005;27(1):5-0
  18. 18. Campos H, Cooper M, Habben JE, Edmeades GO, Schussler JR. Improving drought tolerance in maize: A view from industry. Field Crops Research. 2004;90(1):19-34
  19. 19. Cucci G, Lacolla G, Boari F, Mastro MA, Cantore V. Effect of water salinity and irrigation regime on maize (Zea mays L.) cultivated on clay loam soil and irrigated by furrow in southern Italy. Agricultural Water Management. 2019;222:118-124
  20. 20. Nayyar H, Singh S, Kaur S, Kumar S, Upadhyaya HD. Differential sensitivity of macrocarpa and microcarpa types of Cicer arietinum L to water stress: Association of contrasting stress response with oxidative injury. Journal of Integrative Plants Biology. 2006;48(11):1318-1329
  21. 21. Devasirvatham V, Gaur PM, Raju TN, Trethowan RM, Tan DK. Field response of Cicer arietinum L. to high temperature. Field Crops Research. 2015;172:59-71
  22. 22. Shanko D, Jateni G, Debela A. Effects of salinity on chickpea landraces during germination stage. Biochemistry & Molecular Biology Journal. 2017;3:214-219
  23. 23. Samarah NH, Mullen RE, Cianzio SR, Scott P. Dehydrin-like proteins in soybean seeds in response to drought stress during seed filling. Crop Science. 2006;46(5):2141-2150
  24. 24. Jumrani K, Bhatia VS. Impact of combined stress of high temperature and water deficit on growth and seed yield of soybean. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants. 2018;24(1):37-50
  25. 25. Bustingorri C, Lavado RS. Soybean growth under stable versus peak salinity. Scientia Agricola. 2011;68:102-108
  26. 26. Hussain M, Farooq S, Hasan W, Ul-Allah S, Tanveer M, Farooq M, et al. Drought stress in sunflower: Physiological effects and its management through breeding and agronomic alternatives. Agricultural water management. 31 Mar 2018;201:152-166
  27. 27. Rondanini D, Mantese A, Savin R, Hall AJ. Responses of sunflower yield and grain quality to alternating day/night high temperature regimes during grain filling: Effect of timing, duration intensity of exposure to stress. Field Crops Research. 2006;96(1):48-62
  28. 28. Abd El-Kader AA, Mohamedin AA, Ahmed MK. Growth and yield of sunflower as affected by different salt affected soils. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology. 2006;8:583-587
  29. 29. Vandenbroucke KO, Metzlaff MI. Abiotic stress tolerant crops: Genes, pathways and bottlenecks. Sustainable Food Production. 2013:1-7
  30. 30. Kajla M, Yadav VK, Khokhar J, et al. Increase in wheat production through management of abiotic stresses: A review. Journal of Applied and Natural Science. 2015;7(2):1070-1080
  31. 31. Li S, Liu J, Liu H, Qiu R, Gao Y, Duan A. Role of hydraulic signal and ABA in decrease of leaf stomatal and mesophyll conductance in soil drought-stressed tomato. Frontiers in plant science. 2021;12:653186
  32. 32. Pereira A. Plant abiotic stress challenges from the changing environment. Frontiers in plant science. 2016;7:1123
  33. 33. Jane AB, George DH, Damon PC. Chapter 3 - Hazards, In: Jane A. Bullock, George D. Haddow, Damon P. Coppola editors. Introduction to Homeland Security (Sixth Edition), Butterworth-Heinemann; 2021, Pages 81-140, ISBN 9780128171370
  34. 34. Vicente-Serrano SM, Gouveia C, Camarero JJ, et al. Response of vegetation to drought time-scales across global land biomes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2013;110(1):52-57
  35. 35. Haro-Monteagudo D, Daccache A, Knox J. Exploring utility of drought indicators to assess climate risks to agricultural productivity in humid climate. Hydraulic Research. 2018;49(2):539-551
  36. 36. Wilhite DA, editor. Drought as a natural hazard: Concepts and definitions. In: Drought: A Global Assessment. London, UK: Routledge; 2000. pp. 3-18
  37. 37. Wahab A, Abdi G, Saleem MH, et al. Plants’ physio-biochemical and phyto-hormonal responses to alleviate adverse effects of drought stress: A comprehensive review. Plants. 2022;11(13):1620
  38. 38. UNISDR CRED. The Human Cost of Natural Disasters: A Global Perspective. Geneva: Centre for Research on Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED). 2015
  39. 39. Todorova D, Talaat NB, Katerova Z, et al. Polyamines and brassinosteroids in drought stress responses and tolerance in plants. Water stress and crop plants: a sustainable approach. 2016;2:608-627
  40. 40. Liu H, Bruce DR, Sissons M, Able AJ, et al. Genotype-dependent changes in the phenolic content of durum under water-deficit stress. Cereal Chemistry. 2018;95(1):59-78
  41. 41. Perveen S, Hussain SA. Methionine-induced changes in growth, glycinebetaine, ascorbic acid, total soluble proteins and anthocyanin contents of two Zea mays L. varieties under salt stress. JAPS: Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences. 2021;31(1):131-142
  42. 42. Sofy MR, Aboseidah AA, Heneidak SA, et al. ACC deaminase containing endophytic bacteria ameliorate salt stress in Pisum sativum through reduced oxidative damage induction of antioxidative defense systems. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2021;28(30):40971-40991
  43. 43. McDowell NG, Sapes G, Pivovaroff A, Adams HD, et al. Mechanisms of woody-plant mortality under rising drought, CO2 and vapour pressure deficit. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment. 2022;3(5):294-308
  44. 44. Pepe M, Crescente MF, Varone L. Effect of water stress on physiological and morphological leaf traits: A comparison among the three widely-spread invasive alien species Ailanthus altissima, Phytolacca americana, and Robinia pseudoacacia. Plants. 2022;11(7):899
  45. 45. Zandi P, Schnug E. Reactive oxygen species, antioxidant responses and implications from a microbial modulation perspective. Biology. 2022;11(2):155
  46. 46. Ozturk M, Turkyilmaz Unal BP, et al. Osmoregulation and its actions during the drought stress in plants. Physiologia Plantarum. 2021;172(2):1321-1335
  47. 47. Cutler SR, Rodriguez PL, Finkelstein RR, Abrams SR. Abscisic acid: Emergence of a core signaling network. Annual Review of Plant Biology. 2010;4:61
  48. 48. Shukla S, Zhao C, Shukla D. Dewetting controls plant hormone perception and initiation of drought resistance signaling. Structure. 2019;27(4):692-702
  49. 49. Osakabe Y, Osakabe K, Shinozaki K, Tran LS. Response of plants to water stress. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2014;5:86
  50. 50. Verma V, Ravindran P, Kumar PP. Plant hormone-mediated regulation of stress responses. BMC Plant Biology. 2016;16(1):1-0.
  51. 51. Tung SA, Smeeton R, White CA, Black CR, et al. Over-expression of LeNCED1 in tomato with the rbcS3C promoter allows recovery of lines that accumulate high levels of ABA exhibit severe phenotypes. Plant Cell & Environment. 2008;31(7):968-981
  52. 52. Behnam BA, Iuchi SA, Fujita MI, Fujita YA, et al. Characterization of the promoter region of an Arabidopsis gene for 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase involved in dehydration-inducible transcription. DNA research. 2013;20(4):315-324
  53. 53. Kang J, Hwang JU, Lee M, Kim YY, Assmann SM, Martinoia E, et al. PDR-type ABC transporter mediates cellular uptake of the phytohormone abscisic acid. Proceedings of the National Academy of sciences. 2010;107(5):2355-2360
  54. 54. Pei ZM, Kuchitsu K, Ward JM, Schwarz M, Schroeder JI. Differential abscisic acid regulation of guard cell slow anion channels in Arabidopsis wild-type and abi1 and abi2 mutants. The Plant Cell. 1997;9(3):409-423
  55. 55. Kwak JM, Mori IC, Pei ZM, Leonhardt N, Torres MA, et al. NADPH oxidase AtrbohD and AtrbohF genes function in ROS-dependent ABA signaling in Arabidopsis. The EMBO Journal. 2003;22(11):2623-2633
  56. 56. Negi J, Matsuda O, Nagasawa T, Oba Y, et al. CO2 regulator SLAC1 its homologues are essential anion homeostasis plant cells. Nature. 2008;452(7186):483-486
  57. 57. Miyazono KI, Miyakawa T, Sawano Y, Kubota K, et al. Structural basis of ABA signaling. Nature. 2009;462(7273):609-614
  58. 58. Park SY, Fung P, Nishimura N, Jensen DR, et al. Abscisic acid inhibits type 2C protein phosphatases via PYR/PYL family START proteins. Science. 2009;324(5930):1068-1071
  59. 59. Soon FF, Ng LM, Zhou XE, West GM, Kovach A, et al. Molecular mimicry regulates ABA signaling by SnRK2 kinases and PP2C phosphatases. Science. 2012;335(6064):85-88
  60. 60. Fujita Y, Fujita M, Satoh R, Maruyama K, et al. AREB1 is a transcription activator of novel ABRE-dependent ABA signaling that enhances drought stress tolerance in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell. 2005;17(12):3470-3488
  61. 61. Kagaya Y, Hobo T, Murata M, et al. ABA–induced transcription is mediated by phosphorylation ABA response element binding factor. The Plant Cell. 2002;14(12):3177-3189
  62. 62. Abe H, Urao T, Ito T, Seki M, et al. Arabidopsis AtMYC2 (bHLH) and AtMYB2 (MYB) function as transcriptional activators in ABA signaling. The Plant Cell. 2003;15(1):63-78
  63. 63. Fujita M, Fujita Y, Maruyama K, et al. Dehydration-induced NAC protein, RD26, involved novel ABA-dependent stress-signaling pathway. Plant Journal. 2004;39(6):863-876
  64. 64. Lata C, Prasad M. Role of DREBs in regulation of abiotic stress responses in plants. Journal of experimental botany. 2011;62(14):4731-4748
  65. 65. Kim JS, Mizoi J, Yoshida T, Fujita Y, et al. An ABRE promoter sequence is involved in osmotic stress-responsive expression of the DREB2A gene, which encodes a transcription factor regulating drought-inducible genes in Arabidopsis. Plant and Cell Physiology. 2011;52(12):2136-2146
  66. 66. Xue-Xuan X, Hong-Bo S, Yuan-Yuan M, et al. Biotechnological implications from ABA roles in cold stress and leaf senescence as important signal for improving plant survival under abiotic-stressed conditions. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology. 2010;30(3):222-230
  67. 67. Xiong L, Ishitani M, Lee H, Zhu JK. The Arabidopsis LOS5/ABA3 locus encodes a molybdenum cofactor sulfurase and modulates cold stress–and osmotic stress–responsive gene expression. The Plant Cell. 2001;13(9):2063-2083
  68. 68. Xiao BZ, Chen X, Xiang CB, Tang N, Zhang QF, Xiong LZ. Evaluation of seven function-known candidate genes for their effects on improving drought resistance of transgenic rice under field conditions. Molecular Plant. 2009;2(1):73-83
  69. 69. Zhang Y, Yang J, Lu S, Cai J, Guo Z. Overexpressing SgNCED1 in tobacco increases ABA level, antioxidant enzyme activities, and stress tolerance. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation. 2008;27(2):151-158
  70. 70. Thompson AJ, Andrews J, Mulholland BJ, et al. Overproduction of abscisic acid in tomato increases transpiration efficiency and root hydraulic conductivity and influences leaf expansion. Plant Physiology. 2007;143(4):1905-1917
  71. 71. Wang Y, Ying J, Kuzma M, Chalifoux M, et al. Molecular tailoring of farnesylation for plant drought tolerance and yield protection. The Plant Journal. 2005;43(3):413-424
  72. 72. Pei ZM, Ghassemian M, Kwak CM, et al. Role of farnesyltransferase in ABA regulation of guard cell anion channels and plant water loss. Science. 1998;282(5387):287-290
  73. 73. Khosravi-nejad F, Khavari-nejad RA, Moradi F, Najafi F. Cytokinin and abscisic acid alleviate drought stress through changing organic acids profile, ion immolation, and fatty acid profile to improve yield of wheat cultivars. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants. 2022;24:1-1
  74. 74. Tran LS, Urao T, Qin F, Maruyama K, Kakimoto T, et al. Functional analysis of AHK1/ATHK1 and cytokinin receptor histidine kinases in response to abscisic acid, drought, and salt stress in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of National Academic and Sciences. 2007;104(51):20623-20628
  75. 75. Nishiyama R, Watanabe Y, Fujita Y, et al. Analysis of cytokinin mutants and regulation of cytokinin metabolic genes reveals important regulatory roles of cytokinins in drought, salt and ABA responses, and ABA biosynthesis. The Plant Cell. 2011;23(6):2169-2183
  76. 76. Alvarez S, Marsh EL, Schroeder SG, Schachtman DP. Metabolomic and proteomic changes in the xylem sap of maize under drought. Plant, Cell & Environment. 2008;31(3):325-340
  77. 77. Yuan Z, Wang C, Li S, Li X, Tai F. Effects of different plant hormones or PEG seed soaking on maize resistance to drought stress. Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 2014;94(8):1491-1499
  78. 78. Divi UK, Krishna P. Overexpression of the brassinosteroid biosynthetic gene AtDWF4 in Arabidopsis seeds overcomes abscisic acid-induced inhibition of germination and increases cold tolerance in transgenic seedlings. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation. 2010;29(4):385-393
  79. 79. Jager CE, Symons GM, Ross JJ, Reid JB. Do brassinosteroids mediate the water stress response? Physiologia Plantarum. 2008;133(2):417-425
  80. 80. Farhangi-Abriz S, Torabian S. Biochar increased plant growth-promoting hormones helped to alleviates salt stress in common bean seedlings. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation. 2018;37(2):591-601
  81. 81. Zhang SW, Li CH, Cao J, Zhang YC, et al. Altered architecture and enhanced drought tolerance in rice via the down-regulation of indole-3-acetic acid by TLD1/OsGH3. 13 activation. Plant Physiology. 2009;151(4):1889-1901
  82. 82. Abdelaal KA, Attia KA, Alamery SF, El-Afry MM, et al. Exogenous application of proline and salicylic acid can mitigate the injurious impacts of drought stress on barley plants associated with physiological histological characters. Sustainability. 2020;12(5):1736
  83. 83. Jahan MS, Wang Y, Shu S, Zhong M, et al. Exogenous salicylic acid increases the heat tolerance in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L) by enhancing photosynthesis efficiency and improving antioxidant defense system through scavenging of reactive oxygen species. Scientia Horticulturae. 2019;247:421-429
  84. 84. Maghsoudi K, Emam Y, Ashraf M, Arvin MJ. Alleviation of field water stress in wheat cultivars by using silicon and salicylic acid applied separately or in combination. Crop and Pasture Science. 2019;70(1):36-43
  85. 85. Munsif F, Shah T, Arif M, Jehangir M, et al. Combined effect of salicylic acid and potassium mitigates drought stress through the modulation of physio-biochemical attributes and key antioxidants in wheat. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. 2022;29(6):103294
  86. 86. Lobato AK, Barbosa MA, Alsahli AA, Lima EJ, Silva BR. Exogenous salicylic acid alleviates the negative impacts on production components, biomass and gas exchange in tomato plants under water deficit improving redox status and anatomical responses. Physiologia Plantarum. 2021;172(2):869-884
  87. 87. Bashar KK. Hormone dependent survival mechanisms of plants during post-waterlogging stress. Plant Signaling & Behavior. 2018;13(10):e1529522
  88. 88. Chandwani S, Amaresan N. Role of ACC deaminase producing bacteria for abiotic stress management and sustainable agriculture production. Environment Science Pollution Research. Apr 2022;29(16):22843-22859
  89. 89. Mathur S, Raikalal P, Jajoo A. Physiological responses of wheat to environmental stresses. In: Wheat Production in Changing Environments. Singapore: Springer; 2019. pp. 31-61
  90. 90. Hao Z, AghaKouchak A, Phillips TJ. Changes in concurrent monthly precipitation and temperature extremes. Environmental Research Letters. 2013;8(3):034014
  91. 91. IPCC: Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Masson DV, Zhai P, Pirani A, Connors SL, Péan C, Berger S. et al. editiors. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press; 2021. pp. 3−32
  92. 92. Gourdji SM, Sibley AM, Lobell DB. Global crop exposure to critical high temperatures in reproductive period: Trends future projections. Environment Research Letter. 2013;8(2):024041
  93. 93. Lippmann R, Babben S, Menger A, Delker C, Quint M. Development of wild and cultivated plants under global warming conditions. Current Biology. 2019;29(24):R1326-R1338
  94. 94. Li N, Euring D, Cha JY, Lin Z, Lu M, et al. Plant hormone-mediated regulation of heat tolerance in response to global climate change. Fron. Plant Sci. 2021;11:627969
  95. 95. Hu S, Ding Y, Zhu C. Sensitivity and responses of chloroplasts to heat stress in plants. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2020;11:375
  96. 96. Wu YS, Yang CY. Ethylene-mediated signaling confers thermotolerance and regulates transcript levels of heat shock factors in rice seedlings under heat stress. Botanical studies. 2019;60(1):1-2
  97. 97. Guihur A, Rebeaud ME, Goloubinoff P. How do plants feel the heat and survive? Trends in Biochemical Sciences. 2022
  98. 98. Larkindale J, Hall JD, Knight MR, Vierling E. Heat stress phenotypes of Arabidopsis mutants implicate multiple signaling pathways in the acquisition of thermotolerance. Plant Physiology. 2005;138(2):882-897
  99. 99. Castroverde CD, Dina D. Temperature regulation of plant hormone signaling during stress and development. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2021;72(21):7436-7458
  100. 100. Kaya H, Takeda S, Kobayashi MJ, Kimura S, et al. Comparative analysis of the reactive oxygen species-producing enzymatic activity of Arabidopsis NADPH oxidases. Plant Journal. 2019;98(2):291-300
  101. 101. Silva-Correia J, Freitas S, Tavares RM, et al. Phenotypic analysis of Arabidopsis heat stress response during germination early seedling development. Plant Methods. 2014;10(1):1-1
  102. 102. Gao-Takai M, Katayama-Ikegami A, et al. A low temperature promotes anthocyanin biosynthesis but does not accelerate endogenous ABA accumulation in red-skinned grapes. Plant Science. 2019;283:165-176
  103. 103. Zhang X, Wang X, Zhuang L, Gao Y, Huang B. ABA mediation of drought priming-enhanced heat tolerance in Festuca arundinacea and Arabidopsis. Physiologia Plantarum. 2019;167(4):488-501
  104. 104. Rezaul IM, Baohua F, Tingting C, Weimeng F, et al. Abscisic acid prevents pollen abortion under high-temperature stress by mediating sugar metabolism in rice spikelets. Physiologia Plantarum. 2019;165(3):644-663
  105. 105. Küpers JJ, Oskam L, Pierik R. Photoreceptors regulate plant developmental plasticity through auxin. Plants. 2020;9(8):940
  106. 106. Franklin KA, Lee SH, Patel D, Kumar SV, et al. Phytochrome-interacting factor 4 regulates auxin biosynthesis high temperature. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2011;108(50):20231-20235
  107. 107. Sun J, Qi L, Li Y, Chu J, Li C. PIF4–mediated activation of YUCCA8 expression integrates temperature into the auxin pathway in regulating Arabidopsis hypocotyl growth. PLoS genetics. 2012;8(3):e1002594
  108. 108. Van Der Woude LC, Perrella G, Snoek BL, et al. HISTONE DEACETYLASE 9 stimulates auxin-dependent thermomorphogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana by mediating H2A. Z depletion. Proceedings of National Academic Sciences. 2019;116(50):25343-25354
  109. 109. Kim EJ. Russinova E Brassinosteroid signalling. Current Biology. 2020;30:R294-R298
  110. 110. Oh E, Zhu JY, Wang ZY. Interaction between BZR1 and PIF4 integrates brassinosteroid and environmental responses. Nature Cell Biology. 2012;14(8):802-809
  111. 111. Ibañez C, Delker C, Martinez C, Bürstenbinder K, et al. Brassinosteroids dominate hormonal regulation of plant thermomorphogenesis via BZR1. Current Biology. 2018;28(2):303-310
  112. 112. Bellstaedt J, Trenner J, Lippmann R, et al. A mobile auxin signal connects temperature sensing in cotyledons with growth responses in hypocotyls. Plant Physiology. 2019;180(2):757-766
  113. 113. Dhaubhadel S, Browning KS, Gallie DR, Krishna P. Brassinosteroid functions to protect the translational machinery and heat-shock protein synthesis following thermal stress. The Plant Journal. 2002;29(6):681-691
  114. 114. Sadura I, Libik-Konieczny M, Jurczyk B, Gruszka D, Janeczko A. Plasma membrane ATPase and the aquaporin HvPIP1 in barley brassinosteroid mutants acclimated to high and low temperature. Journal of Plant Physiology. 2020;244:153090
  115. 115. Nie WF, Wang MM, Xia XJ, Zhou YH, et al. Silencing of tomato RBOH1 and MPK2 abolishes BR-induced H2O2 generation and stress tolerance. Plant, Cell Environment. 2013;36(4):789-803
  116. 116. Yin Y, Qin K, Song X, Zhang Q , Zhou Y, Xia X, et al. BZR1 transcription factor regulates heat stress tolerance through FERONIA receptor-like kinase-mediated reactive oxygen species signaling in tomato. Plant and Cell Physiology. 2018;59(11):2239-2254
  117. 117. Zhou J, Xia XJ, Zhou YH, Shi K, Chen Z, Yu JQ. RBOH1-dependent H2O2 production and subsequent activation of MPK1/2 play an important role in acclimation-induced cross-tolerance in tomato. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2014;65(2):595-607
  118. 118. Fei Q , Wei S, Zhou Z, Gao H, Li X. Adaptation of root growth to increased ambient temperature requires auxin and ethylene coordination in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Reports. 2017;36(9):1507-1518
  119. 119. Clarke SM, Cristescu SM, Miersch O, et al. Jasmonates act with salicylic acid to confer basal thermotolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. The New Phytologist. 2009;182(1):175-187
  120. 120. Cortleven A, Leuendorf JE, Frank M, et al. Cytokinin action in response to abiotic and biotic stresses in plants. Plant, Cell & Environment. 2019;42(3):998-1018
  121. 121. Dobrá J, Černý M, Štorchová H, Dobrev P, et al. The impact of heat stress targeting on the hormonal and transcriptomic response in Arabidopsis. Plant Science. 2015;231:52-61
  122. 122. Prerostova S, Dobrev PI, Kramna B, Gaudinova A, Knirsch V, Spichal L, et al. Heat acclimation and inhibition of cytokinin degradation positively affect heat stress tolerance of Arabidopsis. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2020;18(11):87
  123. 123. Skalák J, Černý M, Jedelský P, Dobrá J, et al. Stimulation of ipt overexpression as a tool to elucidate the role of cytokinins in high temperature responses of Arabidopsis thaliana. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2016;67(9):2861-2873
  124. 124. Sobol S, Chayut N, Nave N, Kafle D, et al. Genetic variation in yield under hot ambient telmperatures spotlights a role for cytokinin in protection of developing floral primordia. Plant, Cell & Environment. 2014;37(3):643-657
  125. 125. Wu C, Cui K, Wang W, Li Q , Fahad S, Hu Q , et al. Heat-induced cytokinin transportation and degradation are associated with reduced panicle cytokinin expression and fewer spikelets per panicle in rice. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2017;8:371
  126. 126. Wassie M, Zhang W, Zhang Q , Ji K, Cao L, Chen L. Exogenous SA ameliorates heat stress-induced damages and improves growth and photosynthetic efficiency in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 2020;191:110206
  127. 127. Wang LJ, Fan L, Loescher W, et al. Salicylic acid alleviates decreases in photosynthesis under heat stress and accelerates recovery in grapevine leaves. BMC Plant Biology. 2010 10(1):1-0.
  128. 128. Toh S, Kamiya Y, Kawakami N, Nambara E, et al. Thermoinhibition uncovers a role for SL in Arabidopsis seed germination. Plant Cell Physiology. 2012;53(1):107-117
  129. 129. Bawa G, Feng L, Chen G, Chen H, et al. Gibberellins and auxin regulate soybean hypocotyl elongation under low light and high-temperature interaction. Physiologia Plantarum. 2020;170(3):345-356
  130. 130. Ferrero LV, Viola IL, Ariel FD, Gonzalez DH. Class I TCP transcription factors target the gibberellin biosynthesis gene GA20ox1 and the growth-promoting genes HBI1 and PRE6 during thermomorphogenic growth in Arabidopsis. Plant and Cell Physiology. 2019;60(8):1633-1645
  131. 131. Toh S, Imamura A, Watanabe A, Nakabayashi K, et al. High temperature-induced ABA biosynthesis and its role in the inhibition of gibberellin action in Arabidopsis seeds. Plant Physiology. 2008;146(3):1368-1385
  132. 132. Huot B, Castroverde CD, Velásquez AC, et al. Dual impact of elevated temperature on plant defence and bacterial virulence in Arabidopsis. Nat. com. 2017;8(1):1-2
  133. 133. Havko NE, Kapali G, Das MR, Howe GA. Stimulation of insect herbivory by elevated temperature outweighs protection by jasmonate pathway. Plants. 2020;9(2):172
  134. 134. Richards LA. Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. Agriculture Handbook. 1968;60:210-220
  135. 135. Farooq M, Gogoi N, Hussain M, Barthakur S, et al. Effects, tolerance mechanisms management of salt stress in grain legumes. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2017;118:199-217
  136. 136. Singh RP, Jha P, Jha PN. Bio-inoculation of plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium Enterobacter cloacae ZNP-3 increased resistance against salt and temperature stresses in wheat plant (Triticum aestivum L.). Journal of Plant Growth Regulation. 2017;36(3):783-798
  137. 137. Jusovic M, Velitchkova MY, Misheva SP, Börner A, Apostolova EL, Dobrikova AG. Photosynthetic responses of a wheat mutant (Rht-B1c) with altered DELLA proteins to salt stress. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation. 2018;37(2):645-656
  138. 138. Tao JJ, Chen HW, Ma B, Zhang WK, Chen SY, Zhang JS. The role of ethylene in plants under salinity stress. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2015;6:1059
  139. 139. Zhao C, Jiang W, Zayed O, Liu X, Tang K, Nie W, et al. The LRXs-RALFs-FER module controls plant growth and salt stress responses by modulating multiple plant hormones. National Science Review. 2021;8(1):nwaa149
  140. 140. Morgan PW, Drew MC. Ethylene and plant responses to stress. Physiologia Plantarum. 1997;100(3):620-630
  141. 141. Cao WH, Liu J, He XJ, Mu RL, et al. Modulation of ethylene responses affects plant salt-stress responses. Plant Physiology. 2007;143(2):707-719
  142. 142. Peng J, Li Z, Wen X, Li W, Shi H, Yang L, et al. Salt-induced stabilization of EIN3/EIL1 confers salinity tolerance by deterring ROS accumulation in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genetics. 2014;10(10):e1004664
  143. 143. Zhao XC, Schaller GE. Effect of salt and osmotic stress upon expression of ethylene receptor ETR1 in Arabidopsis thaliana. Febs Letters. 2004;562(1-3):189-192
  144. 144. Peng Z, He S, Gong W, Sun J, Pan Z, Xu F, et al. Comprehensive analysis of differentially expressed genes and transcriptional regulation induced by salt stress in two contrasting cotton genotypes. BMC Genomics. 2014;15(1):1-28
  145. 145. Achard P, Cheng H, De Grauwe L, et al. Integration of plant responses to environmentally activated phytohormonal signals. Science. 2006;311(5757):91-94
  146. 146. Li G, Meng X, Wang R, Mao G, Han L, Liu Y, et al. Dual-level regulation of ACC synthase activity by MPK3/MPK6 cascade and its downstream WRKY transcription factor during ethylene induction in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genetics. 2012;8(6):e1002767
  147. 147. Cao WH, Liu J, Zhou QY, Cao YR, et al. Expression of tobacco ethylene receptor NTHK1 alters plant responses to salt stress. Plant Cell Environment. 2006;29(7):1210-1219
  148. 148. Shen X, Wang Z, Song X, Xu J, Jiang C, Zhao Y, et al. Transcriptomic profiling revealed an important role of cell wall remodeling and ethylene signaling pathway during salt acclimation in Arabidopsis. Plant molecular biology. 2014;86(3):303-317
  149. 149. Liu Y, Zhang S. Phosphorylation of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid synthase by MPK6, a stress-responsive mitogen-activated protein kinase, induces ethylene biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell. 2004;16(12):3386-3399
  150. 150. Du H, Wu N, Cui F, You L, Li X, Xiong L. A homolog of ETHYLENE OVERPRODUCER, OsETOL1, differentially modulates drought and submergence tolerance in rice. The Plant Journal. 2014;78(5):834-849
  151. 151. Zhou HL, Cao WH, Cao YR, Liu J, Hao YJ, Zhang JS, et al. Roles of ethylene receptor NTHK1 domains in plant growth, stress response and protein phosphorylation. FEBS letters. 2006;580(5):1239-1250
  152. 152. Lei G, Shen M, Li ZG, Zhang B, et al. EIN2 regulates salt stress response and interacts with a MA3 domain-containing protein ECIP1 in Arabidopsis. Plant, Cell & Environment. 2011;34(10):1678-1692
  153. 153. Ryu H, Cho YG. Plant hormones in salt stress tolerance. Journal of Plant Biology. 2015;58(3):147-155
  154. 154. Saeng-ngam S, Takpirom W, Buaboocha T, et al. The role of the OsCam1-1 salt stress sensor in ABA accumulation salt tolerance in rice. Journal of Plant Biology. 2012;55(3):198-208
  155. 155. Moons A, Bauw G, Prinsen E, Van Montagu M, Van Der Straeten D. Molecular and physiological responses to abscisic acid and salts in roots of salt-sensitive and salt-tolerant Indica rice varieties. Plant Physiology. 1995;107(1):177-186
  156. 156. He T, Cramer GR. ABA concentrations are correlated with leaf area reductions in two salt-stressed rapid-cycling brassica species. Plant and Soil. 1996;179(1):25-33
  157. 157. Cabot C, Sibole JV, Barceló J, Poschenrieder C. Abscisic acid decreases leaf Na+ exclusion in salt-treated Phaseolus vulgaris L. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation. 2009;28(2):187-192
  158. 158. Cramer GR, Quarrie SA. Abscisic acid is correlated with the leaf growth inhibition of four genotypes of maize differing in their response to salinity. Functional plant biology. 2002;29(1):111-115
  159. 159. Rao KP, Richa TA, Kumar KU, et al. In silico analysis reveals 75 members of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase gene family in rice. DNA research. 2010;17(3):139-153
  160. 160. Jung JH, Park CM. Auxin modulation of salt stress signaling in Arabidopsis seed germination. Plant signaling & behavior. 2011;6(8):1198-1200
  161. 161. Wang L, Wang Z, Xu Y, Joo SH, et al. OsGSR1 is involved in crosstalk between gibberellins and brassinosteroids in rice. The Plant Journal. 2009;57(3):498-510
  162. 162. Kazan K. Auxin and the integration of environmental signals into plant root development. Annals of botany. 2013;112(9):1655-1665
  163. 163. Wang X, Dinler BS, Vignjevic M, Jacobsen S, Wollenweber B. Physiological and proteome studies of responses to heat stress during grain filling in contrasting wheat cultivars. Plant Science. 2015;230:33-50
  164. 164. Aremu AO, Masondo NA, Sunmonu TO, et al. A novel inhibitor of cytokinin degradation (INCYDE) influences the biochemical parameters and photosynthetic apparatus in NaCl-stressed tomato plants. Planta. 2014;240(4):877-889
  165. 165. Rivero RM, Gimeno J, Van Deynze A, Walia H, Blumwald E. Enhanced cytokinin synthesis in tobacco plants expressing PSARK: IPT prevents degradation of photosynthetic protein complexes during drought. Plant & Cell Physiology. 2010;51(11):1929-1941
  166. 166. Li, Y.J. Zhang, J.C. Zhang, J. etal. Expression of an Arabidopsis molybdenum factor sulphurase gene in soybean enhances drought tolerance and increases yield under field conditions Plant Biotechnology Journal, 11 (2013), pp. 747-758
  167. 167. Lu Y, Li Y, Zhang J, Xiao Y, et al. Overexpression of Arabidopsis molybdenum cofactor sulfurase gene confers drought tolerance in maize. PLoS One. 2013;8:e52126
  168. 168. Zhang JJ, Li WJ, Zhang SN, et al. The putative auxin efflux carrier OsPIN3t is involved in drought stress response drought tolerance. The Plant Journal. 2012;72:805-816
  169. 169. Kim IJD, Baek HC, Park HJ, et al. Overexpression of Arabidopsis YUCCA6 in potato results in high-auxin developmental phenotypes and enhanced resistance to water deficit Mol. Plant. 2013;6:337-349
  170. 170. Cai ZQ , Gao Q. Comparative physiological and biochemical mechanisms of salt tolerance five contrasting highland quinoa cultivars. BMC plant biology. 2020;20(1):1-5
  171. 171. Shukla VK, Doyon Y, Miller JC, DeKelver RC, et al. Precise genome modification in the crop species Zea mays using zinc-finger nucleases. Nature. 2009;459(7245):437-441
  172. 172. Nekrasov V, Staskawicz B, Weigel D, Jones JD, Kamoun S. Targeted mutagenesis in the model plant Nicotiana benthamiana using Cas9 RNA-guided endonuclease. Nature Biotechnology. 2013;31(8):691-693
  173. 173. Kohli A, Sreenivasulu N, Lakshmanan P, Kumar PP. The phytohormone crosstalk paradigm takes center stage in understanding how plants respond to abiotic stresses. Plant Cell Reports. 2013 32(7):945-957.

Written By

Nazima Rasool

Submitted: 27 November 2022 Reviewed: 12 January 2023 Published: 20 February 2023

© 2023 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Continue reading from the same book

View All

Your cart

Discounts available on purchase of multiple copies. View rates

Subtotal £0.00

Local taxes (VAT) are calculated in later steps, if applicable.

Support: orders@intechopen.com

Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Morty Proxy This is a proxified and sanitized view of the page, visit original site.