Skip to main content

Stack Exchange Network

Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.

Visit Stack Exchange

Timeline for Counting without zeroes

Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0

18 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 22, 2019 at 22:26 comment added Grismar You're right @DavidCary, thanks for putting a name to it - I wasn't aware.
Nov 22, 2019 at 2:53 comment added David Cary Is this bijective base-26, as used in many spreadsheets ?
Nov 21, 2019 at 2:07 answer added fede s. timeline score: 1
Nov 20, 2019 at 17:03 comment added Barmar @Grismar You're right. With normal numbers, 01 is the same as 1, but your alphabet sequence doesn't have a zero that works like that.
Nov 20, 2019 at 3:56 comment added Grismar @shrivaths, if the character set would be [a, b, c] and 1 => a, 2 => b, 3=>c, with 0 missing, the values in the output are [1, 2, 3, 11, 12, 13, 21, 22, 23, 31, 32, 33, 111, etc.] - i.e. counting in base 4, skipping values that have zeroes - but see below for a different look at the same problem, looking at the series as a complete product of the character set of with an increasing number of factors.
Nov 20, 2019 at 3:43 vote accept Grismar
Nov 20, 2019 at 3:06 comment added Sriv Can you please name a few values that would not be present?
Nov 20, 2019 at 2:53 comment added Grismar @Barmar, actually no. Imagine an alphabet with only [a, b]. The series would be [a, b, aa, ab, ba, bb, aaa, etc.] - turn that into numbers and you get [0, 1, 00, 01, etc.] so it's not like counting in base 26, with that mapping. Instead, if you count in base 27 [0, 1, 2 .. p, 10, 11, 12, ..] and leave out the numbers containing 0, you get [1, 2 .. p, 11, 12, ..] and then map using 1 => a etc., you get the correct series. That's the whole issue, I just feel there may be a more efficient modelling of the same problem.
Nov 20, 2019 at 0:00 history tweeted twitter.com/StackCodeReview/status/1196941392624439298
Nov 19, 2019 at 23:50 comment added Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen filter out all those with a 0
Nov 19, 2019 at 20:30 comment added Barmar Isn't it more like counting in base 26, with 0 => a, 1 => b, etc.
Nov 19, 2019 at 19:47 answer added Sriv timeline score: 1
Nov 19, 2019 at 16:04 history became hot network question
Nov 19, 2019 at 11:15 comment added slepic @Graipher he probably meant to say that no letter maps to number zero.
Nov 19, 2019 at 8:51 answer added Graipher timeline score: 18
Nov 19, 2019 at 8:38 comment added Graipher What is one of the numbers/letter combinations being skipped?
Nov 19, 2019 at 8:05 review First posts
Nov 19, 2019 at 11:16
Nov 19, 2019 at 8:03 history asked Grismar CC BY-SA 4.0
Morty Proxy This is a proxified and sanitized view of the page, visit original site.