Message 351991 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	lisroach
Recipients	cjw296, ezio.melotti, lisroach, michael.foord, xtreak
Date	2019-09-11.17:24:54
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1568222694.73.0.217906468671.issue38122@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to

Content
This idea has been brought up in person before and also discussed on AsyncTest: https://github.com/Martiusweb/asynctest/issues/100 It could be useful if someone has a lot of attributes that are also async that need to be mocked. It could probably be done with a flag that gets passed on to _get_child_mock and overrides the if statement to always return an AsyncMock. Looking mostly for if people think this is a good idea/bad idea and help see around any corners that may be there.

This idea has been brought up in person before and also discussed on AsyncTest: https://github.com/Martiusweb/asynctest/issues/100


It could be useful if someone has a lot of attributes that are also async that need to be mocked. 

It could probably be done with a flag that gets passed on to _get_child_mock and overrides the if statement to always return an AsyncMock.


Looking mostly for if people think this is a good idea/bad idea and help see around any corners that may be there.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2019-09-11 17:24:54	lisroach	set	recipients: + lisroach, cjw296, ezio.melotti, michael.foord, xtreak
2019-09-11 17:24:54	lisroach	set	messageid: <1568222694.73.0.217906468671.issue38122@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2019-09-11 17:24:54	lisroach	link	issue38122 messages
2019-09-11 17:24:54	lisroach	create