Message 204163 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	ncoghlan
Recipients	Arfrever, brett.cannon, eric.snow, ncoghlan
Date	2013-11-24.02:27:26
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<CADiSq7d32=tEro1BB8OOo9E1D0Kb3xGCTfmk0+6m=77OgWH_2w@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to	<1385222348.06.0.416110381918.issue19713@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
I think we should definitely support them, I just haven't thought of a way to do that yet which is cleaner than the status quo (it's only the loader part of the API that isn't fully covered - the rest of the legacy APIs can be deprecated happily). I may come up with an idea once we start work on migrating extension module loading in 3.5.

I think we should definitely support them, I just haven't thought of a way
to do that yet which is cleaner than the status quo (it's only the loader
part of the API that isn't fully covered - the rest of the legacy APIs can
be deprecated happily). I may come up with an idea once we start work on
migrating extension module loading in 3.5.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2013-11-24 02:27:26	ncoghlan	set	recipients: + ncoghlan, brett.cannon, Arfrever, eric.snow
2013-11-24 02:27:26	ncoghlan	link	issue19713 messages
2013-11-24 02:27:26	ncoghlan	create